Cited by 26Sexual function and dysfunction studiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessment of anxiety, depression and somatization in women with vulvodynia: a systematic review and META-analysis

Dagostin Ferraz, Sarah, Rodrigues Candido, Ana Claudia, Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura, Colonetti, Tamy, Santina Dagostin, Valdemira, Rosa, Maria Inês·2024·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objective To assess the presence of anxiety, depression and somatization in women with vulvodynia.Methods The search for articles was performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE, via PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and the American Psychological Association (PsycINFO). A search strategy was developed using the following terms: "Vulvodynia" and "psychological symptom" and their respective synonyms. The search was limited to human studies and no language restriction.Results After the screening process, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The studies were published between 1993 and 2017, with 2886 participants, of which 912 are cases and 1974 are controls. Meta-analysis of included studies revealed a significant difference between groups in depression outcomes (DMP: 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.41 to 1.10; p < 0.0001; I2: 28 %), anxiety (DMP: 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.84 to 1.59; p < 0.00001; I2:0%) and somatization (DMP: 1.31; 95%CI: 0.80 to 1.82; p < 0.00001; I2: 46 %).Conclusion Through the meta-analyses, significant associations were observed between vulvodynia and depression, anxiety and somatization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.025

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Provoked vulvodynia is associated with other conditions, such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.

    “Provoked vulvodynia is associated with other conditions, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fibromyalgia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depressive symptoms. 5,8,9”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagostin Ferraz, S., Rodrigues Candido, A. C., Rodrigues Uggioni, M. L., Colonetti, T., Santina Dagostin, V., & Rosa, M. I.
Affiliations
Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (BR)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
344
Pages
122-131
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387538406
Cited by
26
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
vulvodynia, anxiety, depression, somatization, psychological symptoms, women, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review