Cited by 47Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for Chinese patients with depression: An exploratory study in Taiwan

Hung, Shan, Li, Min-Shan, Chen, Yen-Lin, Chiang, Jung-Hsien, Chen, Ying-Yeh, Hung, Galen Chin-Lun·2016·Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Mobile mental health has a potential to improve the recognition and management of Chinese patients with depression. Currently, evidence regarding ecological momentary assessment (EMA) for depressive disorder mostly originates from Western studies. Herein, we examined the validity of smartphone-based EMA for depression in Chinese patients and explored the determinants of use. A smartphone application, iHOPE, was used to perform daily EMA of depression, anxiety, sleep and cognitive performance. Outpatients with depressive disorder were recruited to use iHOPE for 8 weeks. Clinical characteristics and smartphone use patterns were assessed at baseline. We enrolled 59 Chinese patients with depression. In 8 weeks, participants interacted with iHOPE for an average of 10.8 (SD=12.3) days; a trend of decreased frequency of use (p=0.03) was observed. Scores of HAM-D at baseline was associated with, of the first 2 weeks, scores of PHQ-9 (p=0.005), EMA of depression (p=0.003) and anxiety (p<0.001), and poorer sleep quality (p=0.023). Among the demographic, clinical and smartphone-use variables examined, only limited internet package for smartphone (<500M per month) predicted higher use of iHOPE (p=0.04). The present study provides initial evidence for the feasibility of smartphone-based EMA in Chinese patients with depression. Level of engagement needs to be improved before determining its clinical usefulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hung, S., Li, M.-S., Chen, Y.-L., Chiang, J.-H., Chen, Y.-Y., & Hung, G. C.-L.
Affiliations
  • Taipei City Hospital (TW)
  • Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hung, Galen Chin-Lun
Venue
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
23
Pages
131-136
ISSN
1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2509963317
Cited by
46
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, depression, Chinese patients, mobile mental health, user engagement, sleep quality, anxiety, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Taiwan, Telemedicine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review