Cited by 446Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review

Open access
Jakob, Robert, Harperink, Samira, Rudolf, Aaron Maria, Fleisch, Elgar, Haug, Severin, Mair, Jacqueline Louise, Salamanca-Sanabria, Alicia, Kowatsch, Tobias·2022·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) apps show vast potential in supporting patients and health care systems with the increasing prevalence and economic costs of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, despite the availability of evidence-based mHealth apps, a substantial proportion of users do not adhere to them as intended and may consequently not receive treatment. Therefore, understanding the factors that act as barriers to or facilitators of adherence is a fundamental concern in preventing intervention dropouts and increasing the effectiveness of digital health interventions. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to help stakeholders develop more effective digital health interventions by identifying factors influencing the continued use of mHealth apps targeting NCDs. We further derived quantified adherence scores for various health domains to validate the qualitative findings and explore adherence benchmarks. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature search (January 2007 to December 2020) was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ACM Digital Library. Data on intended use, actual use, and factors influencing adherence were extracted. Intervention-related and patient-related factors with a positive or negative influence on adherence are presented separately for the health domains of NCD self-management, mental health, substance use, nutrition, physical activity, weight loss, multicomponent lifestyle interventions, mindfulness, and other NCDs. Quantified adherence measures, calculated as the ratio between the estimated intended use and actual use, were derived for each study and compared with the qualitative findings. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 2862 potentially relevant articles, of which 99 (3.46%) were included as part of the inclusion criteria. A total of 4 intervention-related factors indicated positive effects on adherence across all health domains: personalization or tailoring of the content of mHealth apps to the individual needs of the user, reminders in the form of individualized push notifications, user-friendly and technically stable app design, and personal support complementary to the digital intervention. Social and gamification features were also identified as drivers of app adherence across several health domains. A wide variety of patient-related factors such as user characteristics or recruitment channels further affects adherence. The derived adherence scores of the included mHealth apps averaged 56.0% (SD 24.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the scarce scientific evidence on factors that positively or negatively influence adherence to mHealth apps and is the first to quantitatively compare adherence relative to the intended use of various health domains. As underlying studies mostly have a pilot character with short study durations, research on factors influencing adherence to mHealth apps is still limited. To facilitate future research on mHealth app adherence, researchers should clearly outline and justify the app's intended use; report objective data on actual use relative to the intended use; and, ideally, provide long-term use and retention data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/35371

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adherence score for the experimental condition was comparable with adherence scores for mobile mental health apps targeting the clinical population (56.6%) and mindfulness apps targeting the general public (59%).

    “the adherence score for the experimental condition was comparable with the adherence scores for mobile mental health apps targeting the clinical population (ie, 56.6%) and mindfulness apps targeting the general public (ie, 59%), as reported by Jakob et al [37].”

    From A Gamified Mobile App That Helps People Develop the Metacognitive Skills to Cope With Stressful Situations and Difficult Emotions: Formative Assessment of the InsightApp (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results sections on Mental Health and Mindfulness report mean adherence scores of 56.6% and 59.0%, respectively. The Mindfulness section says most included apps aimed to improve well-being or reduce work-related stress rather than treat a chronic mental condition, but the review does not characterize the entire mindfulness group as targeting the general public or the entire mental-health group as targeting a clinical population. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To increase treatment uptake among students with depression or anxiety symptoms, there is a need for bCBT approaches that fit therapists' as well as patients' needs and preferences.

    “Thus, to increase treatment uptake among students with depression or anxiety symptoms, there is a need for bCBT approaches that fit therapists’ as well as patients’ needs and preferences [39].”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of a Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety Based on Experiences of University Students: Qualitative Interview Study (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion sections on personalization and professional support recommend tailoring mHealth apps to users’ needs and suggest that hybrid app-and-human support may improve adherence. The paper does not establish that bCBT fitted to both therapists’ and patients’ preferences increases treatment uptake among students with depression or anxiety symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some participants proposed including additional notifications to remind users to complete tasks before the next therapy session, which they thought could increase overall therapy adherence.

    “In addition, some participants proposed including additional notifications in the app that would remind users to complete tasks before the next therapy session. In their opinion, this could have increased overall therapy adherence:”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of a Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety Based on Experiences of University Students: Qualitative Interview Study (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion section on individualized reminders says push notifications can improve adherence to mHealth app interventions, and the Results section on mental health reports an association between customizable reminders and better adherence (pages unavailable). The paper does not report participants proposing notifications for tasks before the next therapy session or expressing that opinion about overall therapy adherence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Personalization options that allow users to skip specific exercises or time-consuming tasks are perceived as crucial for engagement with DTx among students.

    “Previous research has shown that personalization options that would, for example, allow users to skip specific exercises or time-consuming tasks, are perceived as crucial for the engagement with DTx among students [37,39], and this feature was not provided in this bCBT program.”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of a Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety Based on Experiences of University Students: Qualitative Interview Study (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion section on personalization reports that personalized mHealth content can improve adherence and that individualized apps can improve engagement. The Results section on physical activity also links customizable exercise plans to adherence. Neither passage establishes that students using DTx perceived the ability to skip specific exercises or time-consuming tasks as crucial. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The onboarding function of the app was evaluated as positive but not essential for the therapy process.

    “In contrast to the findings of Jakob et al [39], who found that skipping the tutorial significantly increased the chance of dropping out, the onboarding function of the app was evaluated as positive but not essential for the therapy process.”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of a Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety Based on Experiences of University Students: Qualitative Interview Study (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results (Nutrition and Mindfulness; page unavailable) associate initial tutorials or in-app tutorials with better adherence, and the Discussion lists an integrated tutorial as a positive factor. The review does not report that skipping a tutorial significantly increased the chance of dropping out. The assessment that onboarding was positive but not essential is the citing authors’ contrasting finding, not a claim attributed to Jakob et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakob, R., Harperink, S., Rudolf, A. M., Fleisch, E., Haug, S., Mair, J. L., Salamanca-Sanabria, A., & Kowatsch, T.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Singapore-ETH Centre (SG)
Corresponding author
Jakob, Robert
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2022-05-25
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
e35371
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225577560
Cited by
446
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 121 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 8
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation Singapore
  • Bundesamt für Gesundheit
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
non-communicable diseases, digital health interventions, barriers and facilitators, content personalization, push notifications, gamification, social support, mobile application design, lifestyle intervention, mental health, substance use, nutrition, physical activity, weight loss, mindfulness, user characteristics, recruitment channels
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Noncommunicable Diseases, Humans, Mental Health, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review