Cited by 128Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users

Open access
Jungmann, Stefanie Maria, Klan, Timo, Kuhn, Sebastian, Jungmann, Florian·2019·JMIR Formative Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health apps for the screening and diagnosis of mental disorders have emerged in recent years on various levels (eg, patients, practitioners, and public health system). However, the diagnostic quality of these apps has not been (sufficiently) tested so far. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the diagnostic quality of a health app for a broad spectrum of mental disorders and its dependency on expert knowledge. METHODS: Two psychotherapists, two psychology students, and two laypersons each read 20 case vignettes with a broad spectrum of mental disorders. They used a health app (Ada-Your Health Guide) to get a diagnosis by entering the symptoms. Interrater reliabilities were computed between the diagnoses of the case vignettes and the results of the app for each user group. RESULTS: Overall, there was a moderate diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.64) between the results of the app and the case vignettes for mental disorders in adulthood and a low diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.40) for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence. When psychotherapists applied the app, there was a good diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.78) regarding mental disorders in adulthood. The diagnostic agreement was moderate (kappa=0.55/0.60) for students and laypersons. For mental disorders in childhood and adolescence, a moderate diagnostic quality was found when psychotherapists (kappa=0.53) and students (kappa=0.41) used the app, whereas the quality was low for laypersons (kappa=0.29). On average, the app required 34 questions to be answered and 7 min to complete. CONCLUSIONS: The health app investigated here can represent an efficient diagnostic screening or help function for mental disorders in adulthood and has the potential to support especially diagnosticians in their work in various ways. The results of this pilot study provide a first indication that the diagnostic accuracy is user dependent and improvements in the app are needed especially for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/13863

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [7]Löcherer R Apolináro-Hagen J Efficacy and acceptance of webbased programs for self-help for facilitation of psycological health and handling of stress during academic studies 2019-02-11 Wirksamkeit und Akzeptanz von webbasierten Selbsthilfeprogrammen zur Förderung psychischer Gesundheit und zur Stressbewältigung im Studium: Ein Scoping-Review der aktuellen Forschungsliteratur. [Efficacy and acceptance of webbased programs for self-help for facilitation of psycological health and handling of stress during academic studies.] https://www.e-beratungsjournal.net/ausgabe_0117/Loecherer_Apolinario-Hagen.pdf
  2. [9]Döpfner M Schürmann S Lehmkuhl G Wackelpeter und Trotzkopf. Hilfen für Eltern bei ADHS-Symptomen, hyperkinetischem und oppositionellem Verhalten. Mit Online-Materialien. 4., überarb. Aufl. [Jello-Pete and stubbornness: Help for Parents with ADHS-symptoms, hyperkinetic and opposing behavior. With online materials. 4th, revised edition.] 2011 Weinheim, Basel Beltz
  3. [35]Hoffmann H ITU: Committed to connecting the world 2019-05-10 Ada Health Our Approach to Assess Ada’s Diagnostic Performance. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/Workshops-and-Seminars/20180925/Documents/3_Henry%20Hoffmann.pdf
  4. [39]Freyberger H Dilling H Fallbuch Psychiatrie: Kasuistiken zum Kapitel V(F) der ICD-10. 2 Auflage. [Case Book Psychiatry: Casuistics on Chapter V(F) of the ICD-10. 2nd edition.] 2014 Bern Huber
  5. [40]Poustka F van Goor-Lambo G Fallbuch Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie. Erfassung und Bewertung belastender Lebensumstände von Kindern nach Kapitel V (F) der ICD-10. [Case Book Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Recording and evaluation of stressful life circumstances of children according to Chapter V (F) of the ICD-10.] 2008 Göttingen Hogrefe
  6. [48]Field A Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Fourth Edition 2013 Thousand Oaks, California, United States SAGE
  7. [52]Razzaki S Baker A Perov Y Middleton K Baxter J Mullarkey D Sangar D Taliercio M Butt M Majeed A DoRosario A Mahoney M Johri S arXiv 2018 2019-09-27 A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence and Human Doctors for the Purpose of Triage and Diagnosi. https://marketing-assets.babylonhealth.com/press/BabylonJune2018Paper_Version1.4.2.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jungmann, S. M., Klan, T., Kuhn, S., & Jungmann, F.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Jungmann, Stefanie Maria
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2019-10-29
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e13863
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982702361
Cited by
127
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
chatbots, psychiatric diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, health apps, symptom-based screening, inter-rater reliability, psychotherapists, case vignettes, adult mental disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review