Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ecology of Team Science

Open access
Stokols, Daniel, Misra, Shalini, Moser, Richard P., Hall, Kara L., Taylor, Brandie K.·2008·American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Increased public and private investments in large-scale team science initiatives over the past two decades have underscored the need to better understand how contextual factors influence the effectiveness of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Toward that goal, the findings from four distinct areas of research on team performance and collaboration are reviewed: (1) social psychological and management research on the effectiveness of teams in organizational and institutional settings; (2) studies of cyber-infrastructures (i.e., computer-based infrastructures) designed to support transdisciplinary collaboration across remote research sites; (3) investigations of community-based coalitions for health promotion; and (4) studies focusing directly on the antecedents, processes, and outcomes of scientific collaboration within transdisciplinary research centers and training programs. The empirical literature within these four domains reveals several contextual circumstances that either facilitate or hinder team performance and collaboration. A typology of contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration is proposed as a basis for deriving practical guidelines for designing, managing, and evaluating successful team science initiatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Kahn, 1993, An experiment in scientific organization, 10.5089/9781557753502.084 · DOI
  2. Stokols, 2008, The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement, Am J Prev Med, 35, S77, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wuchty, 2007, The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science, 316, 1036, 10.1126/science.1136099 · DOI · Paper page
  4. NIH. BECON 2003 symposium on catalyzing team science (Day 1). 2003 June 23–24; Bethesda MD videocast.nih.gov/launch.asp?9924.
  5. Stokols, 2003, Evaluating transdisciplinary science, Nicotine Tob Res, 5, S21, 10.1080/14622200310001625555 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Klein, 2008, Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review, Am J Prev Med, 35, S116, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Trochim, 2008, The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrated mixed-methods approach, Am J Eval, 29, 8, 10.1177/1098214007309280 · DOI
  8. Smith, 2001, Measuring the social impact of research, BMJ, 323, 528, 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.528 · DOI
  9. Morgan, 2003, Facilitating transdisciplinary research: the experience of the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers, Nicotine Tob Res, 5, S11, 10.1080/14622200310001625537 · DOI
  10. Marks, 2006, Rescuing the NIH before it is too late, J Clin Invest, 116, 844, 10.1172/JCI28364 · DOI
  11. Weissmann, 2005, Roadmaps, translational research, and childish curiosity, FASEB J, 19, 1761, 10.1096/fj.05-1101ufm · DOI
  12. Abrams, 2003, Transdisciplinary tobacco use research, Nicotine Tob Res, 5, S5, 10.1080/14622200310001625519 · DOI
  13. Younglove-Webb, 1999, The dynamics of multidisciplinary research teams in academia, Rev Higher Educ, 22, 425, 10.1353/rhe.1999.0019 · DOI
  14. Rhoten, 2004, Education: risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path, Science, 306, 2046, 10.1126/science.1103628 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Stokols, 2005, In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: lessons learned and implications for active living research, Am J Prev Med, 28, 202, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016 · DOI
  16. Fuqua, 2004, Transdisciplinary collaboration as a basis for enhancing the science and prevention of substance use and “abuse.”, Subst Use Misuse, 39, 1457, 10.1081/JA-200033200 · DOI
  17. Stokols, 2006, Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research, Am J Community Psychol, 38, 63, 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5 · DOI
  18. Zerhouni, 2005, Translational and clinical science—time for a new vision, N Engl J Med, 353, 1621, 10.1056/NEJMsb053723 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hays, 2008, The science of team science: commentary on measurements of scientific readiness, Am J Prev Med, 35, S193, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.016 · DOI
  20. Guzzo, 1996, Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness, Annu Rev Psychol, 47, 307, 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rosenfield, 1992, The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences, Soc Sci Med, 35, 1343, 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R · DOI · Paper page
  22. Klein, 2004, Prospects for transdisciplinarity, Futures, 36, 515, 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lawrence, 2004, Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice, Futures, 36, 487, 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.001 · DOI
  24. Tyers, 2003, From genomics to proteomics, Nature, 422, 193, 10.1038/nature01510 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kerr, 2004, Group performance and decision making, Annu Rev Psychol, 55, 623, 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bennis, 1997, The secrets of great groups, Leader to Leader, 3, 29, 10.1002/ltl.40619970310 · DOI
  27. Reagans, 2004, How to make the team: social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams, Adm Sci Q, 49, 101, 10.2307/4131457 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Milliken, 1996, Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity on organizational groups, Acad Manage Rev, 21, 192, 10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Wiersema, 1992, Top management team demography and corporate strategic change, Acad Manage J, 35, 91, 10.2307/256474 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Katz, 1982, The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance, Adm Sci Q, 27, 81, 10.2307/2392547 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Harrison, 2003, Time matters in team performance: effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality, Personnel Psychol, 56, 633, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00753.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jackson, 1985, Equity in effort: an explanation of the social loafing effect, J Pers Soc Psychol, 49, 1199, 10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1199 · DOI
  33. Kayes, 2005, Experiential learning in teams, Simul Gaming, 36, 330, 10.1177/1046878105279012 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Latane, 1979, Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing, J Pers Soc Psychol, 37, 822, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Okhuysen, 2001, Structuring change: familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups, Acad Manage J, 44, 794, 10.2307/3069416 · DOI
  36. Mullen, 1989, Group size, leadership behavior, and subordinate satisfaction, J Gen Psychol, 116, 155, 10.1080/00221309.1989.9711120 · DOI
  37. Magjuka, 1991, Team-based employee involvement programs: effects of design and administration, Personnel Psychol, 44, 793, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00699.x · DOI
  38. Stewart, 2006, A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance, J Manage, 32, 29, 10.1177/0149206305277792 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Vinokur-Kaplan, 1995, Treatments that work (and those that don't): an application of Hackman's group effectiveness model to interdisciplinary teams in psychiatric hospitals, J Appl Behav Sci, 31, 303, 10.1177/0021886395313005 · DOI
  40. Sundstrom, 1990, Work teams: applications and effectiveness, Am Psychol, 45, 120, 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Sonnenwald, 2007, Scientific collaboration: a synthesis of challenges and strategies, vol. 41
  42. Stogdill, 1948, Personal factors associated with leadership, J Psychol, 25, 35, 10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362 · DOI · Paper page
  43. O'Connell, 2001, Leadership and semiautonomous work team performance, Group Organ Manag, 27, 50, 10.1177/1059601102027001004 · DOI
  44. Cohen, 1997, A hierarchical construct of self management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived group effectiveness, Personnel Psychol, 50, 275, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00909.x · DOI
  45. Collins, 2001, Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve, Harv Bus Rev, 79, 66
  46. Sivasubramaniam, 2002, A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance, Group Organ Manag, 27, 66, 10.1177/1059601102027001005 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Ericksen, 2004, Right from the start: exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance, Adm Sci Q, 49, 438, 10.2307/4131442 · DOI
  48. Cooperrider, 1987, Appreciative inquiry in organizational life, vol. 1
  49. Monge, 1992, Communication and the motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation, Organization Science, 3, 250, 10.1287/orsc.3.2.250 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ancona, 1992, Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams, Adm Sci Q, 37, 634, 10.2307/2393475 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Wageman, 1995, Interdependence and group effectiveness, Adm Sci Q, 40, 145, 10.2307/2393703 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Manz, 1997, Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and socio-technical systems theory, Organization Science, 8, 59, 10.1287/orsc.8.1.59 · DOI
  53. Finholt, 1997, From laboratories to collaboratories: a new organizational form for scientific collaboration, Psychol Sci, 8, 28, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00540.x · DOI
  54. Wulf, 1993, The collaboratory opportunity, Science, 261, 854, 10.1126/science.8346438 · DOI
  55. Finholt, 2003, Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization, Econ Innov New Techn, 12, 5, 10.1080/10438590303119 · DOI
  56. Jarvenpaa, 1999, Communication and trust in global virtual teams, Organizational Science, 10, 791, 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Mayer, 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust, Acad Manage Rev, 20, 709, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Dourish, 1996, Your place or mine?, Comput Support Coop Work, 5, 33, 10.1007/BF00141935 · DOI
  59. Teasley, 2001, Scientific collaboration at a distance, Science, 292, 2254, 10.1126/science.1061619 · DOI
  60. Lantz, 2001, Can communities and academia work together on public health research?, J Urban Health: Bull N Y Acad Med, 78, 495, 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Butterfoss, 1993, Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion, Health Educ Res, 8, 315, 10.1093/her/8.3.315 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Cohen, 2000, Balancing the collaboration equation, Science, 288, 2155, 10.1126/science.288.5474.2155 · DOI
  63. Altman, 1995, Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities, Health Psychol, 14, 526, 10.1037/0278-6133.14.6.526 · DOI
  64. Kumpfer, 1993, Leadership and team effectiveness in community coalitions for the prevention of alcohol and other drug abuse, Health Educ Res, 8, 359, 10.1093/her/8.3.359 · DOI
  65. Sonnenwald, 2003, Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: results of a controlled experiment, ACM Trans Computer-Human Interaction, 10, 150, 10.1145/772047.772051 · DOI
  66. Jeffry, 2003, Smoothing the waters: observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration, Soc Stud Sci, 33, 539, 10.1177/0306312703334003 · DOI
  67. Creamer, 2004, Collaborators' attitudes about differences of opinion, J Higher Educ, 75, 566, 10.1353/jhe.2004.0028 · DOI
  68. Hall, 2008, The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers: findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC year-one evaluation study, Am J Prev Med, 35, S161, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.035 · DOI
  69. Wray, 2002, The epistemic significance of collaborative research, Philos Sci, 69, 150, 10.1086/338946 · DOI
  70. Havemann, 2001, Collaboration behavior of Berlin life science researchers in the last two decades of the twentieth century as reflected in the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 52, 435, 10.1023/A:1014295816154 · DOI
  71. Cohen, 2003, Asia—the new frontier for HIV/AIDS, Science, 301, 1650, 10.1126/science.301.5640.1650 · DOI
  72. Ashton, 1986, Healthy cities: WHO's new public health initiative, Health Promot, 1, 319, 10.1093/heapro/1.3.319 · DOI
  73. Duhl, 1996, An ecohistory of health: the role of “healthy cities.”, Am J Health Promot, 10, 258, 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.258 · DOI
  74. Gray, 2008, Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership, Am J Prev Med, 35, S124, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.037 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., & Taylor, B. K.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
S96-S115
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
OpenAlex
W2104118319
Cited by
565
References
10
FWCI
48.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.