Cited by 464Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org

Open access
Zaza, Stephanie, Wright-De Agüero, Linda K, Briss, Peter A, Truman, Benedict I, Hopkins, David P, Hennessy, Michael H, Sosin, Daniel M, Anderson, Laurie +3 more·2000·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A standardized abstraction form and procedure was developed to provide consistency, reduce bias, and improve validity and reliability in the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide). DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT: The content of the abstraction form was based on methodologies used in other systematic reviews; reporting standards established by major health and social science journals; the evaluation, statistical and meta-analytic literature; expert opinion and review; and pilot-testing. The form is used to classify and describe key characteristics of the intervention and evaluation (26 questions) and assess the quality of the study's execution (23 questions). Study procedures and results are collected and specific threats to the validity of the study are assessed across six categories (intervention and study descriptions, sampling, measurement, analysis, interpretation of results and other execution issues). DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES: Each study is abstracted by two independent reviewers and reconciled by the chapter development team. Reviewers are trained and provided with feedback. DISCUSSION: What to abstract and how to summarize the data are discretionary choices that influence conclusions drawn on the quality of execution of the study and its effectiveness. The form balances flexibility for the evaluation of papers with different study designs and intervention types with the need to ask specific questions to maximize validity and reliability. It provides a structured format that researchers and others can use to review the content and quality of papers, conduct systematic reviews, or develop manuscripts. A systematic approach to developing and evaluating manuscripts will help to promote overall improvement of the scientific literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00122-1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. Kafadar K, Andrews JS. Investigating health effects and hazards in the community. In: Stroup DF, Teutsch SM, eds. Statistics and public health: quantitative approaches to public health problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998:93-122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaza, S., Wright-De Agüero, L. K., Briss, P. A., Truman, B. I., Hopkins, D. P., Hennessy, M. H., Sosin, D. M., Anderson, L., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Teutsch, S. M., & Pappaioanou, M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Zaza, Stephanie
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
44-74
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151006952
Cited by
464
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 29
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
systematic reviews, study quality assessment, community preventive services, evidence-based recommendations, research validity, reliability statistics, interobserver agreement, meta-analysis, reporting guidelines
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Decision Making, Forms and Records Control, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Research Design, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review