Cited by 93Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes in Treatment-resistant Hypertension in Patients with Coronary Disease

Open access
Bangalore, Sripal, Fayyad, Rana, Laskey, Rachel, DeMicco, David A., Deedwania, Prakash, Kostis, John B., Messerli, Franz H.·2014·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Increasingly, apparent treatment-resistant hypertension has been recognized. However, much of the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes are largely unknown, especially in patients with coronary artery disease.Methods We evaluated 10,001 patients with coronary artery disease who were enrolled in the Treating to New Targets trial. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg despite 3 antihypertensive agents or <140 mm Hg with ≥ 4 antihypertensive agents. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events (composite of fatal coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and stroke).Results Among the 10,001 patients in the trial, 1112 (11.1%) had apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. In a multivariable model adjusting for baseline differences, the treatment-resistant hypertension group had a 64% increase in primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.94; P < .001), driven by a 69% increase in coronary heart disease death (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22, 2.34; P = .001) and 73% increase in nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.39-2.16, P < .0001) when compared with the no apparent treatment-resistant hypertension group. In addition, patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension had a 71% increase in major coronary event (P < .0001), 45% increase in death (P = .001), 33% increase in heart failure (P = .05), 53% increase in any cardiovascular event (P < .0001), 60% increase in any coronary event (P < .0001), 68% increase in angina (P < .0001), and 51% increase in coronary revascularization (P < .0001) when compared with the no apparent treatment-resistant hypertension group. Results were largely similar whether the definition of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension was based on a blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg despite 3 agents or a blood pressure <140 mm Hg with ≥ 4 agents.Conclusions In patients with coronary artery disease, apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is associated with a marked increase in the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, including an increase in all-cause death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.038

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bangalore, S., Fayyad, R., Laskey, R., DeMicco, D. A., Deedwania, P., Kostis, J. B., & Messerli, F. H.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bangalore, Sripal
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
127
Issue
1
Pages
71-81.e1
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067046716
Cited by
93
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Novartis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
treatment-resistant hypertension, coronary artery disease, antihypertensive therapy, major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease mortality, heart failure, coronary revascularization, blood pressure control, angina pectoris, stroke, cardiac arrest, secondary prevention, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Calcium Channel Blockers, Coronary Disease, Diuretics, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Resistance, Female, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Pyrroles, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review