Cited by 466Animal Behavior and ReproductionNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The mating system of the prairie vole, microtus-ochrogaster – field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding

Getz, Lowell L., Carter, C. Sue, Gavish, Leah·1981·Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00299829

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Getz, L. L., Carter, C. S., & Gavish, L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
1981-06
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
189-194
ISSN
  • 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0762
OpenAlex
W2045083678
Cited by
466
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, pair bonding, monogamy, mating systems, pair separation, postpartum estrus, sexual receptivity, Microtus pennsylvanicus, rodent social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review