Cited by 65Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthReligion and Society Interactions

Religious Observance and Acute Coronary Syndrome in Predominantly Muslim Albania: A Population-based Case-Control Study in Tirana

Burazeri, Genc, Goda, Artan, Kark, Jeremy D.·2008·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to assess the association of religious observance with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in a predominantly Muslim population.Methods A case-control study conducted in Tirana, Albania in 2003-2006 included 467 nonfatal consecutive ACS patients (370 men, 97 women; 88% response) and a population-based control group (469 men, 268 women; 69% response). Religious observance was assessed as a composite score based on mosque/church attendance, frequency of prayer and ritual fasting. The association of religiosity with ACS was assessed by multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.Results Nonobservance was frequent in this population (67% among Muslim controls, 55% in Christian controls). Religious observance was inversely associated with ACS in both groups (multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for above median observance scores vs zero observance: 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26-0.77] in Muslims, 0.58 [0.25-1.31] in Christians, and 0.48 [0.31-0.74] overall]. Associations with ACS were strongest for prayer and fasting.Conclusions In a country experiencing major socioeconomic transition from rigid communism, including extreme state-enforced secularism, we found an apparent protective effect associated with religious observance in both Muslims and Christians. This may be the first such study reported in a Muslim population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.09.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 13 most rigorous CHD studies, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD and one found a positive one.

    “Of the 13 studies with the most rigorous methodology, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD [357–365] and one found a positive one [366].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burazeri, G., Goda, A., & Kark, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Mother Teresa Hospital (AL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Burazeri, Genc
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
937-945
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982483834
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious practice, acute coronary syndrome, religiosity, Muslim population, Christian population, prayer, mosque attendance, secularism, socio-economic transition, Tirana
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Albania, Christianity, Employment, Female, Humans, Islam, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Spirituality, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review