Cited by 202Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Does Private Religious Activity Prolong Survival? A Six-Year Follow-up Study of 3,851 Older Adults

Helm, H. M., Hays, J. C., Flint, E. P., Koenig, H. G., Blazer, D. G.·2000·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have linked higher religious attendance and longer survival. In this study, we examine the relationship between survival and private religious activity. METHODS: A probability sample of elderly community-dwelling adults in North Carolina was assembled in 1986 and followed for 6 years. Level of participation in private religious activities such as prayer, meditation, or Bible study was assessed by self-report at baseline, along with a wide variety of sociodemographic and health variables. The main outcome was time (days) to death or censoring. RESULTS: During a median 6.3-year follow-up period, 1,137 subjects (29.5%) died. Those reporting rarely to never participating in private religious activity had an increased relative hazard of dying over more frequent participants, but this hazard did not remain significant for the sample as a whole after adjustment for demographic and health variables. When the sample was divided into activity of daily living (ADL) impaired and unimpaired, the effect did not remain significant for the ADL impaired group after controlling for demographic variables (hazard ratio [RH] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.35). However, the increased hazard remained significant for the ADL unimpaired group even after controlling for demographic and health variables (RH 1.63, 95% CI 1.20-2.21), and this effect persisted despite controlling for numerous explanatory variables including health practices, social support, and other religious practices (RH 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults who participate in private religious activity before the onset of ADL impairment appear to have a survival advantage over those who do not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/55.7.m400

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 18 best studies, three (20%) reported positive relationships (worse pain in the more R/S).

    “Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S [534] or reduced pain in response to a R/S intervention [535–542]), while three (20%) reported positive relationships (worse pain in the more R/S) [543–545].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helm, H. M., Hays, J. C., Flint, E. P., Koenig, H. G., & Blazer, D. G.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Helm, H. M.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
M400-M405
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2169917084
Cited by
202
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ag002102-013)
  • National Institute on Aging (N01AG2102)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
prayer, meditation, Bible study, survival, mortality, older adults, activities of daily living, functional disability, religious participation, social support, health practices
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longevity, Male, Prospective Studies, Religion, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review