Cited by 23LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

Transgender Adults From Minoritized Ethnoracial Groups in the U.S. Report Greater Subjective Cognitive Decline

Open access
Cicero, Ethan C, Lett, Elle, Flatt, Jason D, Benson, G Perusi, Epps, Fayron·2023·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Objectives: Investigate subjective cognitive decline (SCD) among 4 study groups consisting of cisgender and transgender adults who are from minoritized ethnoracial groups (i.e., minoritized ethnoracial transgender, minoritized ethnoracial cisgender) and White cisgender and transgender adults aged 45+ (i.e., White transgender, White cisgender) to determine the odds of SCD by group and to test for group differences. Methods: Data from the 2015–2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used in a modified case–control approach to perform an intercategorical intersectional study. Each transgender participant was matched to 2 cisgender men and 2 cisgender women, on state, ethnoracial identity, and age. Multivariable logistic regressions modeled SCD odds by group and post hoc contrasts estimated pairwise odds ratios comparing the SCD odds for each combination of groups. Results: SCD prevalence was highest among minoritized ethnoracial transgender (21.6%), followed by White transgender (15.0%), minoritized ethnoracial cisgender (12.0%), and White cisgender (9.0%). After accounting for age, education, and survey year, the odds of SCD were higher in minoritized ethnoracial transgender when compared to White cisgender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59–3.96) and minoritized ethnoracial cisgender (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.09). The odds of SCD were higher in White transgender compared to White cisgender (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20–2.30). Discussion: When considering the intersection of transgender and ethnoracial identities, we found that transgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups reported higher odds of SCD when compared to cisgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups. Additional studies are needed to understand the relationship between racialized and gendered inequities in cognitive impairment and how specific mechanisms of systemic transphobia and racism may contribute to this inequity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbad012

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups are more likely to report subjective cognitive decline than other transgender adults.

    “For example, a recent study showed that transgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups are more likely to report subjective cognitive decline than other transgender adults.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [361]

    The Results report higher observed subjective cognitive decline prevalence among transgender adults from minoritized ethnoracial groups than among White transgender adults (21.6% versus 15.0%). But the Results also say the pairwise comparison between those transgender groups was not statistically significant; the significant adjusted differences were against cisgender groups. The claim omits that qualification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. mm6727a1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cicero, E. C., Lett, E., Flatt, J. D., Benson, G. P., & Epps, F.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cicero, Ethan C
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2023-01-23
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
1051-1059
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W4317779165
Cited by
23
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG065452, R24AG066599, K01AG056669)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
subjective cognitive decline, transgender adults, intersectionality, racial disparities, gender disparities, cognitive impairment, transphobia, racism, older adults, health disparities
MeSH terms
Educational Status, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Odds Ratio, Cognitive Dysfunction, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review