Cited by 75Fire effects on ecosystemsWater Quality and Resources StudiesWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

Linking wildfire effects on soil and water chemistry of the Marão River watershed, Portugal, and biomass changes detected from Landsat imagery

Costa, Maria Rosário, Calvão, Ana Rita, Aranha, José·2014·Applied Geochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.09.009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mean N content is similar to ranges reported in the literature (0.10-19.8 g kg−1).

    “While the mean N content is similar to the ranges reported in the literature (0.10 -19.8 g kg -1 ; e.g., Alshehri et al., 2022;Balfour and Woods, 2013;Costa et al., 2014;Pereira et al., 2012; Table 1), N values of an order of magnitude lower than those found in our field samples were observed by Balfour and Woods ( 2013) in ash from temperate conifer forest (0.10 g kg -1 ).”
  • The sum of OC and IC in field samples is within the overall ranges observed for total C in previous studies (50-460 g kg−1).

    “The sum of OC and IC in our field samples (215 g kg -1 ash; Table 3) is within the overall ranges observed for total C in previous studies (50 -460 g kg -1 ; Table 1; e.g., Alshehri et al., 2002;Costa et al., 2014;Pereira et al., 2012;Ulery et al., 1993).”
  • Mean Na concentration is slightly above the maximum value observed in previous studies (0.05-3.30 g kg−1).

    “Mean Na concentration (5 g kg -1 ; Table 3) is slightly above the maximum value observed in previous studies where Na concentration ranges from 0.05 to 3.30 g kg -1 (e. g., Audry et al., 2014;Costa et al., 2014;Ferreira et al., 2005; Table 1).”
  • These contaminants are thought to have complex impacts on water quality and their biological effects in aquatic systems have been observed to persist across long spatial and temporal scales.

    “These contaminants are thought to have complex impacts on water quality and the biological effects of these in aquatic systems have been observed to persist across long spatial and temporal scales (Earl and Blinn 2003;Costa et al. 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, M. R., Calvão, A. R., & Aranha, J.
Affiliations
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT)
Venue
Applied Geochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
44
Pages
93-102
ISSN
0883-2927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071414685
Cited by
75
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Geochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
wildfire effects, soil chemistry, surface water chemistry, water quality, burned area, manganese release, ash deposition, electrical conductivity, cation concentration, post-fire vegetation recovery, Landsat TM, vegetation indices, land cover dynamics, water mineralization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review