Cited by 87Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Accumbens dopamine mediates the rewarding effect of orosensory stimulation by sucrose

Smith, Gerard P·2004·Appetite

Abstract

To investigate the hypothesis that central dopamine mediates the rewarding effect of orosensory stimulation by sucrose that increases eating, specific dopamine antagonists were administered prior to sham-feeding tests in which rats ingested various concentrations of sucrose. Sham feeding (SF) was used to preserve the orosensory stimulation of sucrose while it eliminated sucrose's postingestive effects. The antagonists decreased intake as a function of the concentration of sucrose. Microstructural analysis of licking demonstrated that the antagonists did not affect the motor performance of licking. Thus, the inhibitory effect of the antagonists on intake was due to a decrease in the rewarding effect of sucrose. Microdialysis experiments demonstrated that dopamine was released in the nucleus accumbens during SF and that the synaptic action of dopamine in the accumbens was necessary for the normal rewarding effect of orosensory stimulation by sucrose.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.006

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When palatable foods such as sucrose are actually consumed, a sustained and sweetness-dependent increase occurs in nucleus accumbens dopamine levels and turnover.

    “In addition, when palatable foods such as sucrose are actually consumed, a sustained and sweetness-dependent increase occurs in nucleus accumbens dopamine levels and turnover ([75](#B75), [80](#B80), [165](#B165)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [165]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, G. P.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Gerard P
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
11-13
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067581904
Cited by
87
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, dopamine, sucrose, food reward, dopamine antagonists, sham feeding, licking behavior, dietary intake, dopamine release
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Nucleus Accumbens, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Sucrose, Microdialysis, Dopamine Antagonists, Feedback, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review