Cited by 41Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Visitor-associated variation in captive Diana monkey (Cercopithecus diana diana) behaviour

Todd, Peter A., Macdonald, Charlotte, Coleman, Dorcas·2007·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.010

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todd, P. A., Macdonald, C., & Coleman, D.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Corresponding author
Todd, Peter A.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
107
Issue
1-2
Pages
162-165
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048289490
Cited by
41
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Zoological Society of Scotland
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Diana monkey, captive primates, animal welfare, zoo animal behavior, grooming, play behavior, feeding behaviour

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review