Neuropathology of nondemented aging: presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease
Open accessAbstract
Objective To determine the frequency and possible cognitive effect of histological Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in autopsied older nondemented individuals. Design Senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) were assessed quantitatively in 97 cases from 7 Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADCs). Neuropathological diagnoses of AD (npAD) were also made with four sets of criteria. Adjusted linear mixed models tested differences between participants with and without npAD on the quantitative neuropathology measures and psychometric test scores prior to death. Spearman rank-order correlations between AD lesions and psychometric scores at last assessment were calculated for cases with pathology in particular regions. Setting Washington University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Participants Ninety-seven nondemented participants who were age 60 years or older at death (mean = 84 years). Results About 40% of nondemented individuals met at least some level of criteria for npAD; when strict criteria were used, about 20% of cases had npAD. Substantial overlap of Braak neurofibrillary stages occurred between npAD and no-npAD cases. Although there was no measurable cognitive impairment prior to death for either the no-npAD or npAD groups, cognitive function in nondemented aging appears to be degraded by the presence of NFTs and SPs. Conclusions Neuropathological processes related to AD in persons without dementia appear to be associated with subtle cognitive dysfunction and may represent a preclinical stage of the illness. By age 80–85 years, many nondemented older adults have substantial AD pathology.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 97 nondemented older adults autopsied across seven Alzheimer’s Disease Centers, a substantial minority had Alzheimer-type neuropathology, and higher plaque or tangle burden was linked to slightly poorer cognitive scores despite no clinical dementia. The results support the possibility of a presymptomatic Alzheimer stage, though the study cannot prove that these cases would have progressed.
Key findings
- Depending on the criteria used, 39–47% of cases met some neuropathological AD threshold; stricter thresholds identified about 19–21%. Khachaturian criteria classified 47%, Washington University criteria 39%, CERAD any level 39% (19% possible, 19% probable, 2% definite), and NIA-Reagan any level 39% (20% low, 16% intermediate, 3% high).
- Cases with and without neuropathological AD did not differ in age at death, interval from last assessment to death, education, or last psychometric performance.
- Among cases with lesions in the relevant regions, greater AD pathology correlated with worse performance on episodic memory, category fluency, Trailmaking A and B, and the MMSE; neocortical diffuse senile plaque density best discriminated neuropathological AD from no neuropathological AD.
- Braak stages ranged from 0 to V with a median of II. Older age correlated with higher Braak stage (r = .372, p < .001), limbic NFT density increased with age (r = .437, p < .001), plaque burden did not correlate with age (r = .089, p = .40), and neocortical plaque burden was weakly related to limbic NFT density (r = .196, p = .07).
Methods
- The sample included 97 autopsied nondemented participants aged 60 or older at death (mean 84.3 ± 8.6 years; 55 women; mean education 15.4 ± 2.9 years; mean last MMSE 28.1 ± 2.1) from 7 Alzheimer’s Disease Centers, all with CDR 0 within 2 years of death; 11 CDR > 0 cases were assessed but not reported.
- A central laboratory processed five brain regions uniformly, used silver and immunohistochemical stains, made consensus diagnoses with four criteria sets (Khachaturian, Washington University, CERAD, NIA-Reagan), assigned Braak stages, and quantified plaques and tangles using computerized stereology.
- Analyses used linear mixed models adjusted for center and covariates, ROC/sensitivity analyses for diffuse plaques, and Spearman correlations between lesion densities and last psychometric scores.
Limitations
- The authors state that the study used a convenience sample, could not assess genotype effects, had small samples for some cognitive associations, and faced variability in initial fixation and tissue processing across centers. They also note that plaques and tangles may be downstream of the pathogenic processes causing synaptic and neuronal degeneration, and that the study did not address early protein changes, later neuronal or synaptic loss, vascular lesions, or synucleinopathy.
- The authors caution that findings from nondemented individuals may not extend to cases with manifest dementia, and that missing psychometric data and small numbers with both lesions and test results require interpretive caution.
- Evident from the text: the cross-sectional autopsy design cannot establish whether pathology precedes or predicts dementia, and correlations weakened when all cases were included or when adjusting for age or education.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Correlations of neurofibrillary tangles with psychometric test scores were similar after adjustment for plaque burden within the same region.
“Likewise, results were similar for the correlation of NFTs with the psychometric test scores after adjustment for plaque burden within the same region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Plaque burden was not significantly correlated with age, with a Spearman correlation of 0.089 and p equal to 0.40.
“In contrast, plaque burden was not significantly correlated with age (Figure 4B; Spearman correlation=0.089, p=0.40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was substantial overlap of Braak stages between neuropathological Alzheimer disease and no-neuropathological Alzheimer disease cases.
“there was substantial overlap of the Braak stages between the npAD and no-npAD cases (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spearman correlations between the quantitative neuropathological measures and all CERAD and NIA-Reagan outcomes yielded almost the identical rank order for association with diagnostic level.
“Spearman correlations between the quantitative neuropathological measures and all outcomes of CERAD criteria (no AD or Possible, Probable, or Definite) and all outcomes of NIA-Reagan criteria (no AD or Low, Intermediate, or High) yielded almost the identical rank order for association with diagnostic level (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When strict criteria were used, about 20% of nondemented cases had neuropathological Alzheimer disease.
“when strict criteria were used, about 20% of cases had npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Neocortical plaque burden and limbic neurofibrillary tangle density in nondemented cases were weakly correlated, with a Spearman correlation of 0.196 and p equal to .07.
“Neocortical plaque burden and limbic NFT density in nondemented cases were weakly correlated (Spearman correlation=0.196, p=.07, Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Khachaturian criteria diagnosed neuropathological Alzheimer disease in 46 of 97 cases, or 47%.
“The least strict of the 4 sets of criteria, those proposed by Khachaturian, resulted in a neuropathological diagnosis of AD in 46 of the 97 cases (47%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using NIA-Reagan Intermediate or High criteria, 19% of cases were diagnosed with neuropathological Alzheimer disease.
“and 19% by the NIA-Reagan Intermediate/High criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The density of neurofibrillary tangles in limbic areas was the least discriminative among the assessed neuropathological lesions.
“The density of NFTs in limbic areas was the least discriminative (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No cases met criteria for Braak stage VI.
“No cases met criteria for stage VI (very pronounced neurofibrillary changes throughout all parts of cortex and in many subcortical structures).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using CERAD Probable or Definite criteria, 21% of cases were diagnosed with neuropathological Alzheimer disease.
“using these definitions, 21% were diagnosed with npAD by the CERAD Probable/Definite criteria, and 19% by the NIA-Reagan Intermediate/High criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
About 40% of nondemented individuals met at least some level of criteria for neuropathological Alzheimer disease.
“About 40% of nondemented individuals met at least some level of criteria for npAD; when strict criteria were used, about 20% of cases had npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was virtually no difference between the Braak stages of cases at comparable levels of the CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria.
“There was virtually no difference between the Braak stages of cases at comparable levels of the CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria (Figure 3B,C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Greater pathology was associated with poorer cognitive performance at last assessment on measures of episodic memory, semantic knowledge, visuospatial ability, executive function, and the Mini Mental Status Examination.
“In all cases, greater pathology was associated with poorer cognitive performance at last assessment on measures of episodic memory (Logical Memory Delayed), semantic knowledge (Category Fluency), visuospatial ability (Trailmaking A), and executive function (Trailmaking B) as well as on a general measure, the MMSE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations between psychometric test scores and plaque burden, and between test scores and diffuse senile plaques, were similar after adjustment for neurofibrillary tangles in the same brain region.
“The correlations between the psychometric test scores and plaque burden, and between the test scores and diffuse SPs, were similar after adjustment for NFTs in the same brain region using partial correlation coefficients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Older age was significantly correlated with higher Braak stages, with a Spearman correlation of .372 and p less than .001.
“Older age was significantly correlated with higher Braak stages (Spearman r=.372, p<.001), consistent with observations that NFTs increase with age, even in the absence of SPs.(Arriagada et al., 1992; Price & Morris, 1999)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Arriagada et al., 1992 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Price & Morris, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Neurofibrillary tangle density increased with age in limbic areas, including entorhinal and perirhinal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus field CA1, with a Spearman correlation of 0.437 and p less than .001.
“NFT density increased with age in limbic areas (entorhinal and perirhinal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus field CA1) (Figure 4A; Spearman correlation=0.437, p<.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some psychometric test scores were significantly correlated with the density of Alzheimer disease lesions across the group.
“Although none of the participants in this study had clinically detectable dementia or cognitive impairment that was measurable on an individual basis, a significant correlation of some psychometric test scores was found with the density of AD lesions across the group, indicating that cognitive function in nondemented aging may decline with increasing numbers of NFTs or SPs, including diffuse SPs (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A greater likelihood of neuropathological Alzheimer disease was associated with higher Braak stage scores for all four criteria, with chi-square p less than 0.003.
“Although a greater likelihood of npAD was associated with higher Braak stage scores for all 4 criteria (chi-square, p<0.003), there was substantial overlap of the Braak stages between the npAD and no-npAD cases (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Washington University criteria diagnosed neuropathological Alzheimer disease in 38 cases, or 39%.
“The Washington University criteria yielded a neuropathological diagnosis of AD in 38 cases (39%), identical to the number of cases meeting any of the 3 levels of npAD using CERAD criteria (19% Possible, 19% Probable, and 2% Definite AD; 39% with all levels combined,) and any of the 3 levels of the NIA-Reagan criteria (20% Low, 16% Intermediate, and 3% High; 39% combined).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The density of neocortical diffuse senile plaques best discriminated between neuropathological Alzheimer disease and no-neuropathological Alzheimer disease defined by CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria, followed by the density of diffuse senile plaques in limbic areas.
“ROC analyses indicated that the density of neocortical diffuse SPs best discriminated between npAD and no-npAD (defined by combination of all three diagnostic levels of either criteria), followed by the density of diffuse SPs in limbic areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In nondemented aging, AD lesions including diffuse senile plaques are associated with a harmful effect on cognitive performance when the group is examined as a whole.
“Third, AD lesions (including diffuse SPs) in nondemented aging are associated with a deleterious effect on cognitive performance when examined across the group and hence are unlikely to be benign.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
- Findingown data
Diffuse senile plaques distinguish nondemented cases with npAD from those without npAD.
“Second, diffuse SPs are a prominent feature of npAD in nondemented cases and discriminate cases with and without npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Diffuse senile plaques are a prominent feature of npAD in nondemented cases.
“Second, diffuse SPs are a prominent feature of npAD in nondemented cases and discriminate cases with and without npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no measurable cognitive impairment prior to death for either the no-neuropathological Alzheimer disease or neuropathological Alzheimer disease groups.
“Although there was no measurable cognitive impairment prior to death for either the no-npAD or npAD groups, cognitive function in nondemented aging appears to be degraded by the presence of NFTs and SPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Nondemented older adults have a wide range of Braak stages, even when senile plaque densities are high.
“Nondemented older adults have a wide range of Braak stages, even in individuals with high SP densities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many nondemented older adults in this sample, including the eldest at age 106 years, had few if any senile plaques.
“many of the nondemented older adults in this sample, including the eldest at age 106 years, had few if any SPs (Figure 4,B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, individuals with npAD did not differ in age from those without npAD.
“The individuals with npAD in this study did not differ in age from those without npAD, suggesting that age alone cannot account for the frequency of npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study found preliminary evidence for subtle cognitive impairment during the preclinical stage of npAD that correlates with neurofibrillary tangle densities, plaque burden, and senile plaque densities among individuals with those lesions.
“Although the small sample sizes impose interpretative caution, we found preliminary evidence for subtle cognitive impairment during the preclinical stage of npAD that correlates with NFT densities, plaque burden, and SP densities among individuals with those lesions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
- Premisecitation
Senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer disease, are not restricted to people with dementia of the Alzheimer type and can occur in the brains of cognitively normal older adults.
“Senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD),(Khachaturian, 1985) are not limited to individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) but also may be present in the brains of cognitively normal older adults.(Tomlinson et al., 1968; Crystal et al., 1988; Katzman et al., 1988; Price et al., 1991; Dickson et al., 1992; Tronc”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The mechanisms responsible for senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in nondemented older adults appear identical to those found in Alzheimer disease.
“the mechanisms responsible for SPs and NFTs in nondemented older adults appear identical to those found in AD(Haroutunian et al., 1998; Haroutunian et al., 1999)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductreasoning
Plaque burden and neurofibrillary tangle density were the measures least dependent on fixation differences between cases.
“Plaque burden and NFT density were least dependent on fixation differences between different cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The distribution of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in nondemented older adults corresponds with the hierarchical topographical progression associated with symptomatic Alzheimer disease.
“the distribution of SPs and NFTs in nondemented older adults corresponds with the hierarchical topographical progression associated with symptomatic AD.(Arriagada et al., 1992; Price & Morris, 1999; Price et al., 1991)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Methodological differences and relatively small sample sizes in most prior studies may contribute to conflicting results on relationships between senile plaques or neurofibrillary tangles and cognition in nondemented aging.
“Such methodological differences, combined with relatively small sample sizes in all but one study,(Bennett et al., 2006) may contribute to conflicting results on the relationships between SPs or NFTs and cognition in nondemented aging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
By age 80 to 85 years, many nondemented older adults have substantial Alzheimer disease pathology.
“By age 80–85 years, many nondemented older adults have substantial AD pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The autopsied sample from seven Alzheimer Disease Centers is representative of nondemented older adults in the general population.
- Interpretationown data
Cognitive function in nondemented aging appears to be degraded by the presence of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques.
“Although there was no measurable cognitive impairment prior to death for either the no-npAD or npAD groups, cognitive function in nondemented aging appears to be degraded by the presence of NFTs and SPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed associations between Alzheimer disease lesions and cognitive test scores are not due to other brain pathologies or unmeasured confounders.
- Interpretationown data
AD lesions in nondemented aging are unlikely to be benign.
“Third, AD lesions (including diffuse SPs) in nondemented aging are associated with a deleterious effect on cognitive performance when examined across the group and hence are unlikely to be benign.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
- Premisecitation
Synaptic and neuronal loss developing from senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, or other lesions appears critical for the expression of cognitive symptoms.
“However, SPs and NFTs characterize the neuropathological substrate of AD and synaptic and neuronal loss developing from these or other lesions appear to be critical for the expression of cognitive symptoms.(Masliah et al., 2001; Price et al., 2001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The observed frequency of npAD in nondemented individuals with a mean age at death of 84 years corresponds with some estimates of clinically apparent DAT prevalence in that age group.
“The finding that up to 40% of nondemented individuals with a mean age of death of 84 years have npAD corresponds with some estimates of the prevalence of clinically apparent DAT in this age group.(Hebert et al., 2003)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hebert et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Senile plaques may not be ubiquitous with age.
“Senile plaques may not be ubiquitous with age;(Braak & Braak, 1997; den Dunnen et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Neurofibrillary tangles increase with age even when senile plaques are absent.
“In contrast, NFTs initially develop in limbic areas, and later extend into neocortical areas; they increase as a function of age even in the absence of SPs.(Price & Morris, 1999; Bennett et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Price & Morris, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bennett et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Neurofibrillary tangles initially develop in limbic areas and later extend into neocortical areas.
“In contrast, NFTs initially develop in limbic areas, and later extend into neocortical areas; they increase as a function of age even in the absence of SPs.(Price & Morris, 1999; Bennett et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Price & Morris, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bennett et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Excluding diffuse senile plaques from CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria may omit an important indicator of npAD.
“Exclusion of diffuse SPs from CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria may omit an important indicator of npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The absence of dementia in preclinical npAD presumably reflects a delay between the appearance of Aβ and neurofibrillary lesions and the later neuronal or synaptic degeneration that produces clinical dementia symptoms.
“Presumably the absence of dementia in preclinical npAD reflects a delay between the appearance of Aβ and neurofibrillary lesions and the subsequent neuronal or synaptic degeneration that results in clinical symptoms of dementia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Age alone cannot account for the frequency of npAD.
“The individuals with npAD in this study did not differ in age from those without npAD, suggesting that age alone cannot account for the frequency of npAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
All participants were studied longitudinally with clinical and neuropsychological instruments to exclude contamination of the sample by individuals with unrecognized very mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment.
“Second, all participants had been carefully studied longitudinally with clinical and neuropsychological instruments to exclude contamination of the sample by individuals with unrecognized very mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observations are from nondemented individuals and therefore may not extrapolate to cases in which dementia is already manifest.
“An important caveat for the observations reported here is that they are from nondemented individuals and thus may not extrapolate to cases in which dementia already is manifest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Any set of neuropathological criteria that uses quantitative levels of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles likely establishes an artificial diagnostic boundary.
“suggesting that any set of neuropathological criteria using quantitative levels of SPs and NFTs likely establishes an artificial diagnostic boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There appears to be little neuronal degeneration in preclinical AD.
“Because there appears to be little neuronal degeneration in preclinical AD,(Gomez-Isla et al., 1996; Price et al., 2001; West et al., 2004) this stage of the illness could be an attractive target for treatment with agents developed to modify or arrest the AD process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
It may not be possible to recognize preclinical AD with standard clinical and cognitive measures, even in expert settings such as ADCs.
“It may not be possible to recognize preclinical AD with standard clinical and cognitive measures, even in expert settings (e.g., ADCs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
- May combine two claims. 26
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe mean interval from the last Alzheimer Disease Center assessment to death in the 97 cases was 0.7 plus or minus 0.5 years.
“The mean interval from last ADC assessment to death in the 97 cases was 0.7 +/− 0.5 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study included 97 nondemented autopsied participants who were at least 60 years old at death, with a mean age of 84 years.
“Ninety-seven nondemented participants who were age 60 years or older at death (mean = 84 years).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no differences in mean age at death, interval between last clinical assessment and death, education, or psychometric performance at last assessment before death between cases with neuropathological Alzheimer disease and those without it using any of the four criteria.
“There were no differences in mean age at death, interval between last clinical assessment and death, education, or psychometric performance at last assessment before death between cases with npAD versus those without npAD using any of the 4 criteria (even when restricted to Probable and Definite CERAD and Intermediate and High NIA-Reagan criteria) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe four Braak stage 0 cases were relatively young, aged 66, 69, 72, and 72 years at death.
“The 4 stage 0 cases were relatively young, aged 66, 69, 72, and 72 years at death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe NIA-Reagan criteria identified neuropathological Alzheimer disease at any level in 39% of cases, comprising 20% Low, 16% Intermediate, and 3% High.
“and any of the 3 levels of the NIA-Reagan criteria (20% Low, 16% Intermediate, and 3% High; 39% combined).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter adjusting for age at death, all correlations in Table 3 remained significant except that between limbic diffuse senile plaques and Trailmaking B; limbic neurofibrillary tangles became significantly correlated with Trailmaking A and Digit Symbol.
“Adjusting for age at death, all correlations reported in Table 3 remain significant except for that between limbic diffuse SPs and Trailmaking B (Spearman correlation=0.29, p=.16); conversely, the correlation become significant between limbic NFTs for Trailmaking A (Spearman correlation=−0.39, p=.003) and Digit Symbol (Spearman correlation=0.39, p=.04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInclusion of all cases regardless of whether they had Alzheimer disease lesions attenuated the correlations; neocortical plaque burden remained significantly correlated with Logical Memory-Delayed, limbic neurofibrillary tangles remained significantly correlated with the Mini Mental Status Examination, and neocortical neurofibrillary tangles were significantly correlated with the Mini MentalStatus
“Inclusion of all cases in the analyses, regardless of whether they demonstrated AD lesions, attenuated the correlations, as expected. Nonetheless, neocortical plaque burden remained significantly correlated with Logical Memory-Delayed (Spearman correlation=−0.42, p=0.03). Limbic NFTs also remained significantly correlated with MMSE (Spearman correlation=−0.38, p<.001), and neocortical NFTs were”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter adjusting for education, all correlations in Table 3 remained significant except those between limbic diffuse senile plaques and Trailmaking B and between neocortical diffuse senile plaques and Logical Memory Delayed.
“Adjusting for education, all correlations reported in Table 3 still remain significant except for these between limbic diffuse SPs and Trailmaking B (Spearman correlation=0.36, p=.08) and between neocortical diffuse SPs and Logical Memory Delayed (Spearman correlation=−0.46, p=.06).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBraak neurofibrillary stages in the 97 cases ranged from 0 to V, with a median of Stage II.
“Braak neurofibrillary stages in the 97 cases ranged from 0 (no NFTs observed) to V (widespread neocortical tangles), with a median value of Stage II (Stage 0, n=4; Stage I, n=31; Stage II, n=36; Stage III, n=15; Stage IV, n=8; Stage V, n=3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CERAD criteria identified neuropathological Alzheimer disease at any level in 39% of cases, comprising 19% Possible, 19% Probable, and 2% Definite.
“identical to the number of cases meeting any of the 3 levels of npAD using CERAD criteria (19% Possible, 19% Probable, and 2% Definite AD; 39% with all levels combined,)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong nondemented older adults, the frequency of npAD was approximately 20% when restricted to Probable/Definite CERAD and Intermediate/High NIA-Reagan criteria, and approximately 40% across all criteria levels.
“First, consistent with previous reports, a substantial proportion of nondemented older adults were found to have npAD, with the frequency ranging from about 20% (when criteria are restricted to Probable/Definite CERAD and Intermediate/High NIA-Reagan) to about 40% (all levels of criteria).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The autopsy sample of nondemented older adults is representative enough that the estimated frequency of npAD applies to nondemented older adults generally.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDiffuse senile plaques, and consequently plaque burden, appear first in the neocortex and best discriminate npAD from no-npAD in nondemented aging.
“Diffuse SPs and consequently plaque burden appear initially in the neocortex and best discriminate npAD and no-npAD in nondemented aging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeurofibrillary tangles were present in almost all cases in this series, although four of the youngest cases had few if any (Braak Stage 0).
“NFTs were present in almost all of the cases in this series, although 4 of the youngest cases had few if any (Braak Stage 0).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnce present in the brain, both senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles occur continuously, with no clear boundary between npAD and no-npAD.
“Once present in the brain, both SPs and NFTs occur in a continuous manner, without a clear boundary between “npAD” and “no-npAD” (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeuropathological criteria for Alzheimer disease use senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle densities to separate Alzheimer disease from aging because the distinction between the two has been considered quantitative rather than qualitative.
“Neuropathological criteria for AD rely on densities of SPs and NFTs to discriminate AD from aging, as the distinction between the two conditions has been thought to be quantitative rather than qualitative.(Tomlinson et al., 1970; Arriagada et al., 1992)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSenile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in nondemented older adults may represent Alzheimer disease before clinical expression, with lesions accumulating over many years before synaptic and neuronal damage produces symptoms.
“Alternatively, the presence of SPs and NFTs in nondemented older adults may represent AD at a stage prior to its clinical expression,(Morris et al., 1996; Price & Morris, 1999; Troncoso et al., 1998; Hulette et al., 1998; Schmitt et al., 2000) in which the neuropathological lesions of AD accumulate over many years before sufficient synaptic and neuronal damage occurs to produce the symptoms of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningQuantitative assessment used Bielschowsky-stained sections because they were more consistent given variable fixation, and immunohistochemical sections were routinely examined and compared with the silver-stained sections.
“Analysis was based on Bielschowsky-stained sections because they were more consistent, given the variable state of fixation of the material from different sources, although immunohistochemical sections (singly stained for Aβ or PHF, or double stained for both Aβ and PHF) were routinely examined and compared with the silver stained sections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenBoth observers were blind to the clinical and Clinical Dementia Rating status of the cases and to the neuropathological findings determined by the contributing Alzheimer Disease Centers.
“Both observers were “blind” to the clinical and CDR status of the cases and to the neuropathological findings determined by the ADCs contributing the cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataNeuropathological diagnoses were made by joint examination by two observers using a double-headed microscope to reach consensus.
“The diagnoses were done by joint examination of each case by DWM and JLP, using a double-headed microscope to arrive at a consensus neuropathological diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSome prior studies reported a negative effect of Alzheimer disease pathology on episodic memory only, without effects in other cognitive domains.
“Some studies have reported a negative effect for episodic memory only,(Hulette et al., 1998; Schmitt et al., 2000; Bennett et al., 2006) without effects in other cognitive domains, while other studies found no relationship between AD pathology and any cognitive measure.(Knopman et al., 2003; Driscoll et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningUniform tissue treatment and uniform staining in the central laboratory reduced variability in density measures despite possible tissue shrinkage.
“Although density measures may be affected by tissue shrinkage, the uniform treatment of the tissue (formalin fixation and paraffin embedding) and uniform staining in the central laboratory reduced variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenClinicians at each Alzheimer Disease Center verified the nondemented status of each case.
“Clinicians at each ADC verified the nondemented status for each case (the neuropathological diagnoses generated at the ADC performing the autopsy were not included in the eligibility criteria).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe central laboratory was blind to the cognitive status of each case.
“all cases were coded so that the central laboratory was blind to the cognitive status of each case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe central laboratory provided a standard and uniform neuropathological assessment to avoid variability from different methods, criteria, and interpretations used at individual Alzheimer Disease Centers.
“The Neuropathology Core (JLP, DWM) of Washington University’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center served as the “central laboratory” to provide a standard and uniform neuropathological assessment of each case and avoid the variability introduced by different methods, criteria, and interpretations used at individual ADCs.(Mirra et al., 1994; Alafuzoff et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOther prior studies found no relationship between Alzheimer disease pathology and any cognitive measure.
“while other studies found no relationship between AD pathology and any cognitive measure.(Knopman et al., 2003; Driscoll et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious studies of neuropathological Alzheimer disease in nondemented aging used cases collected at a single site, and comparison of results has been difficult because neuropathological methods and criteria differed.
“Previous studies of neuropathological AD in nondemented aging have been based on cases collected at a single site(Price & Morris, 1999; Galvin et al., 2005; Bennett et al., 2006), and comparison of results has been difficult because neuropathological methods and criteria differed in these studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenPlaque burden, defined as the percent area occupied by plaques relative to total sampled area, is unaffected by tissue shrinkage.
“Plaque burden was defined as the percent area occupied by plaques in relation to the total area sampled and is unaffected by tissue shrinkage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarlier neuropathological studies reported similar frequencies of npAD in nondemented cases; one study found that 37.3% of 134 cognitively normal older adults autopsied at a mean age of 82-85 years met Intermediate/High NIA-Reagan criteria for npAD.
“Earlier neuropathological studies also reported similar frequency of npAD in nondemented cases, including one reporting that 37.3% of 134 cognitively normal older adults, autopsied at a mean age between 82–85 years, met “Intermediate/High” NIA-Reagan criteria for npAD.(Bennett et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe NIA-Reagan criteria were not intended to characterize nondemented individuals or those with incipient dementia.
“The NIA-Reagan criteria were not intended to characterize nondemented individuals or those with incipient dementia.(National Institute on Aging & Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease, 1997)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Institute on Aging & Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNeuropathological processes related to Alzheimer disease in persons without dementia appear associated with subtle cognitive dysfunction and may represent a preclinical stage of the illness.
“Neuropathological processes related to AD in persons without dementia appear to be associated with subtle cognitive dysfunction and may represent a preclinical stage of the illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria are much more commonly used in practice and research.
“In practice and research, however, the CERAD and NIA-Reagan criteria are much more commonly used.(Schmitt et al., 2000; Knopman et al., 2003; Bennett et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSenile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles characterize the neuropathological substrate of AD.
“However, SPs and NFTs characterize the neuropathological substrate of AD and synaptic and neuronal loss developing from these or other lesions appear to be critical for the expression of cognitive symptoms.(Masliah et al., 2001; Price et al., 2001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere were almost no statistical differences in age at death, years of education, or gender between participants missing data for the last psychometric tests before death and those completing the tests, except for Trailmaking A, where mean education was 16.0 years for participants with data versus 14.4 years for those with missing data.
“Another limitation was missing data in some cases, although there were almost no statistical differences for age at death, years of education, and gender between participants missing data for the last psychometric tests before death and those completing the tests. The only exception was Trailmaking A, where the mean years of education was 16.0 for participants with data vs. 14.4 for participants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Washington University criteria were considered primary because they were based on discriminative analyses of neuropathological data.
“In this report, the Washington University criteria were considered “primary” because they were based on discriminative analyses of neuropathological data.(McKeel et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKeel et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMismatches between neurofibrillary tangle and senile plaque densities are well recognized and can make categorization with NIA-Reagan criteria difficult, because those criteria assume a strong correlation between NP density and NFT distribution.
“Mismatches between NFT and SP densities are well-recognized(Dickson, 1995) and can present difficulties in categorization with NIA-Reagan criteria, which assume a strong correlation between NP density (reflected in the CERAD score) and NFT distribution (reflected in the Braak stage).(Geddes et al., 1997)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAge-related neurofibrillary change may accelerate in the presence of Aβ lesions.
“Age-related neurofibrillary change may accelerate in the presence of Aβ lesions.(Price & Morris, 1999)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price & Morris, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeuronal loss in the entorhinal cortex or hippocampal field CA1 is absent in preclinical npAD, whereas cases with equivalent neuropathological lesion burden but symptomatic very mild DAT (CDR = 0.5) show substantial cell loss.
“Neuronal loss in the entorhinal cortex or hippocampal field CA1 has been shown to be absent in preclinical npAD compared with substantial cell loss in cases with equivalent neuropathological lesion burden but with symptomatic very mild DAT (CDR = 0.5).(Gomez-Isla et al., 1996; Price et al., 2001; West et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe NIA-Reagan working group stated that the appearance of even one senile plaque or neurofibrillary tangle in the brain represents a pathological event.
“The working group that formulated the NIA-Reagan criteria stated that the appearance of even one SP or NFT in the brain represents a pathological event, (National Institute on Aging & Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease, 1997)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Institute on Aging & Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study could not assess a genotype effect.
“Limitations of the study include the use of a convenience sample, inability to assess a genotype effect, small sample sizes for some of the cognitive associations, and variability in initial fixation and tissue processing at individual ADCs that may have influenced immunohistochemical staining and quantitative measurement of neuritic SPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSubtle cognitive deficits can be detected many years before AD diagnosis.
“Subtle cognitive deficits can be detected many years before AD diagnosis(Elias et al., 2000; Kawas et al., 2003; Saxton et al., 2004; Tierney et al., 2005) but have not previously been correlated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe subtle cognitive deficits, although not detectable in individual subjects and insufficient to produce dementia, suggest that neurofibrillary and Aβ lesions, including diffuse senile plaques, exert harmful effects.
“Although not detectable in individual subjects, and insufficient to produce dementia, these deficits nonetheless suggest that the neurofibrillary and Aβ lesions, including diffuse SPs, exert deleterious effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample of 97 individuals was sufficiently large to permit preliminary analyses of the cognitive correlates of AD lesions in the absence of dementia.
“Finally, the sample of 97 individuals was sufficiently large to permit preliminary analyses of the cognitive correlates of AD lesions in the absence of dementia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSenile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles may be downstream consequences of the pathophysiological processes responsible for the synaptic and neuronal degeneration that produces cognitive deficits in AD.
“Another limitation is that SPs and NFTs may be downstream consequences of the pathophysiological processes responsible for the synaptic and neuronal degeneration that produces cognitive deficits in AD.(Shankar et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shankar et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study used a convenience sample.
“Limitations of the study include the use of a convenience sample, inability to assess a genotype effect, small sample sizes for some of the cognitive associations, and variability in initial fixation and tissue processing at individual ADCs that may have influenced immunohistochemical staining and quantitative measurement of neuritic SPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationBecause inter-laboratory variation exists in assessing AD lesions and neuropathological diagnosis, the contributed sections were processed uniformly and interpreted at one center.
“Third, because there remains inter-laboratory variation in assessing AD lesions and consequently in neuropathological diagnosis,(Alafuzoff et al., 2006) the contributed sections were processed uniformly and interpreted at one center.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alafuzoff et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSample sizes for some of the cognitive associations were small.
“Limitations of the study include the use of a convenience sample, inability to assess a genotype effect, small sample sizes for some of the cognitive associations, and variability in initial fixation and tissue processing at individual ADCs that may have influenced immunohistochemical staining and quantitative measurement of neuritic SPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe findings are consistent with, but do not prove, the concept of preclinical AD.
“The findings of this study are consistent with (but do not prove) the concept of preclinical AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The autopsy sample of nondemented older adults is representative enough that the estimated frequency of npAD applies to nondemented older adults generally.
- Rests on an assumption: The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe pathobiological relevance of even diffuse senile plaques for AD is consistent with evidence that soluble Aβ dimers and oligomers, before the stage of senile plaques, have neurotoxic effects and are associated with decreases in long-term potentiation, dendritic spine density, and memory performance in experimental models.
“The pathobiological relevance of even diffuse SPs for AD is consistent with evidence that soluble Aβ dimers and oligomers, prior to the stage of SPs, have neurotoxic effects(Hung et al., 2008) and are associated with decreases in long term potentiation, dendritic spine density, and memory performance in experimental models.(Shankar et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenVariability in initial fixation and tissue processing at individual ADCs may have influenced immunohistochemical staining and quantitative measurement of neuritic senile plaques.
“Limitations of the study include the use of a convenience sample, inability to assess a genotype effect, small sample sizes for some of the cognitive associations, and variability in initial fixation and tissue processing at individual ADCs that may have influenced immunohistochemical staining and quantitative measurement of neuritic SPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeurofibrillary lesions may have greater relevance for cognitive impairment once the clinical symptoms of AD are expressed.
“For example, neurofibrillary lesions may have greater relevance for cognitive impairment once the clinical symptoms of AD are expressed.(Bennett et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSenile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles may elicit a host response that contributes to the neurotoxicity of AD.
“for example, SPs and NFTs may elicit a host response that contributes to the neurotoxicity of AD.(Castellani et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castellani et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThis study did not address the early protein changes leading to senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, or the later synaptic or neuronal loss and other potential factors that could contribute to cognitive dysfunction.
“This study did not address the early protein changes that lead to SPs and NFTs or the later synaptic or neuronal loss and other potential factors (e.g., vascular lesions; synucleinopathy) that could contribute to cognitive dysfunction; for example, SPs and NFTs may elicit a host response that contributes to the neurotoxicity of AD.(Castellani et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The autopsied sample from seven Alzheimer Disease Centers is representative of nondemented older adults in the general population.
“By age 80–85 years, many nondemented older adults have substantial AD pathology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed associations between Alzheimer disease lesions and cognitive test scores are not due to other brain pathologies or unmeasured confounders.
“In all cases, greater pathology was associated with poorer cognitive performance at last assessment on measures of episodic memory (Logical Memory Delayed), semantic knowledge (Category Fluency), visuospatial ability (Trailmaking A), and executive function (Trailmaking B) as well as on a general measure, the MMSE.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four published neuropathological criteria validly classify neuropathological Alzheimer disease in nondemented older adults even though they were developed for dementia.
“Each case was assessed in accordance with 4 published criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of AD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The autopsy sample of nondemented older adults is representative enough that the estimated frequency of npAD applies to nondemented older adults generally.
“The finding that up to 40% of nondemented individuals with a mean age of death of 84 years have npAD corresponds with some estimates of the prevalence of clinically apparent DAT in this age group.(Hebert et al., 2003)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cognitive deficits associated with AD lesions in nondemented individuals are attributable to those lesions rather than to other pathologies or measurement error.
“This study did not address the early protein changes that lead to SPs and NFTs or the later synaptic or neuronal loss and other potential factors (e.g., vascular lesions; synucleinopathy) that could contribute to cognitive dysfunction; for example, SPs and NFTs may elicit a host response that contributes to the neurotoxicity of AD.(Castellani et al., 2008)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is only a weak correlation between the degree of cognitive impairment and the presence of plaques or neurofibrillary tangles.
“However, there is only a weak correlation between the degree of cognitive impairment and the presence of plaques or neurofibrillary tangles (Price et al., 2009)”
From The influence of phospho-tau on dendritic spines of cortical pyramidal neurons in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (2013) · cites this paper as Price et al., 2009
The Results (Quantitative Neuropathological Assessment; page unavailable) report correlations between plaque or tangle measures and cognitive test scores, some modest in size. But the participants had no individually measurable cognitive impairment, so the study does not establish a weak correlation between lesion presence and the degree of clinical impairment. Its explicitly described “weak” correlation is between plaque burden and tangle density, not between lesions and cognition. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAβ deposition is not exclusive to individuals with AD as it can be found also in nondemented elderly individuals.
“It is important to note that Aβ deposition is not exclusive to individuals with AD as it can be found also in nondemented elderly individuals (64).”
From Modeling late-onset Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology via direct neuronal reprogramming (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Aged individuals can harbor a high burden of AD brain lesions at autopsy while remaining cognitively intact, indicating resilience to AD pathology.
“several studies have revealed the existence of aged individuals harboring a high burden of brain lesions at autopsy while remaining cognitively intact, indicating resilience to AD pathology [3, 7, 21, 22, 56, 57, 68, 76, 78, 96].”
From Enhanced microglial dynamics and a paucity of tau seeding in the amyloid plaque microenvironment contribute to cognitive resilience in Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [76]
A significant proportion of subjects with no overt evidence of cognitive impairment in the final assessment prior to death have neuropathological diagnoses of AD.
“Among individuals who showed no overt evidence of cognitive impairment in the final assessment prior to death, post-mortem studies showed a significant proportion of subjects with neuropathological diagnoses of AD”
From Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage, Cell-Cycle Regulation and Neuronal Death May Influence the Clinical Manifestation of Alzheimer’s Disease (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In preclinical Alzheimer's disease cases, there is no measurable cognitive impairment per se, but cognitive function is degraded in the presence of plaques and tangles.
“Supporting this notion, Price et al. reported no measureable cognitive impairment per se in such preclinical AD cases, but degraded cognitive function in the presence of plaques and tangles (Price, et al., 2009).”
From Cellular, synaptic, and biochemical features of resilient cognition in Alzheimer’s disease (2013) · cites this paper as Price, et al., 2009
In human neuropathological studies, tau pathology generally does not progress from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex without co-occurring amyloid pathology.
“Neuropathological studies in humanshave demonstrated that tau pathology generally does not progress from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex in the absence of co-occurring amyloid pathology”
From Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies (2019) · cites this paper as Price et al., 2009
Cognitive impairment in AD is only noted when tau spreads from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex in neuropathological studies.
“Cognitive impairment in AD is only noted when tau spreads from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex in neuropathological studies”
From Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies (2019) · cites this paper as Price et al., 2009
Some of the variability in neuritic plaque detection may be due to the evolution of the NP as part of the disease process.
“Some of the variability may be due to the evolution of the NP as part of the disease process (52-54).”
From Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
Subtle cognitive impairment may be associated with diffuse AβPs, indicating that these lesions may play a direct role in incipient AD, although a direct role of diffuse Aβ plaques without tau pathology has not been proven.
“Subtle cognitive impairment may be associated with diffuse AβPs, indicating that these lesions may play a direct role in incipient AD (54), although a direct role of diffuse Aβ plaques without tau pathology has not been proven.”
From Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
We are aware of no reported case of truly intact cognition despite extremely severe AD pathologic changes (i.e. widespread neocortical NFTs) measured with quantitative pathologic analysis.
“We are aware of no reported case of truly intact cognition despite extremely severe AD pathologic changes (i.e. widespread neocortical NFTs) measured with quantitative pathologic analysis, although many persons with intact cognition have been assessed in autopsy series (33, 42, 54, 133, 142, 148, 151-166).”
From Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · see citing works
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882 · see citing works
Self-citationMirra, S. S., Heyman, A., McKeel, D., Sumi, S. M., Crain, B. J., Brownlee, L. M., Vogel, F. S., Hughes, J. P., Belle, G. V., Berg, L., et al. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.479 · Cited by 4,961 · see citing works
Self-citationImaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B
Klunk, W. E., Engler, H., Nordberg, A., Wang, Y., Blomqvist, G., Holt, D. P., Bergström, M., Savitcheva, I., Huang, G., Estrada, S., et al. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20009 · Cited by 4,496 · see citing works
Self-citationShankar, G. M., Li, S., Mehta, T. H., Garcia-Munoz, A., Shepardson, N. E., Smith, I., Brett, F. M., Farrell, M. A., Rowan, M. J., Lemere, C. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1782 · Cited by 3,685 · see citing works
The assessment of aphasia and related disorders
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,258 · see citing works
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Khachaturian, Z. S. (1985) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060100083029 · Cited by 2,499 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consenus criteria reported by Khachaturian (1985) are based on he highest density of total SPs (diffuse and neuritic) in any ortical field, adjusted for age (the greater the age of the indiidual, the greater the density required for diagnosis).”
BackgroundAssessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders
Sarno, M. T. (1973) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/53.2.225b · Cited by 2,254 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease in the US Population: Prevalence Estimates Using the 2000 Census
Hebert, L. E., Scherr, P. A., Bienias, J. L., Bennett, D. A., & Evans, D. A. (2003) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119 · Cited by 2,168 · see citing works
Observations on the brains of demented old people
Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., & Roth, M. (1970) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(70)90063-8 · Cited by 2,084 · see citing works
Profound Loss of Layer II Entorhinal Cortex Neurons Occurs in Very Mild Alzheimer’s Disease
Gómez-Isla, T., Price, J. L., McKeel Jr., D. W., Morris, J. C., Growdon, J. H., & Hyman, B. T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-14-04491.1996 · Cited by 1,796 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…in the ntorhinal cortex or hippocampal field CA1 has been shown o be absent in preclinical npAD compared with substantial ell loss in cases with equivalent neuropathological lesion urden but with symptomatic very mild DAT (CDR = 0.5) Gomez-Isla et al., 1996; Price et al., 2001; West et al., 004).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFrequency of Stages of Alzheimer-Related Lesions in Different Age Categories
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00056-0 · Cited by 1,656 · see citing works
HYMAN, B. T., & TROJANOWSKI, J. Q. (1997) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-199710000-00002 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Neuropathology of older persons without cognitive impairment from two community-based studies
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Arvanitakis, Z., Kelly, J. F., Aggarwal, N. T., Shah, R. C., & Wilson, R. S. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219668.47116.e6 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Katzman, R., Terry, R., DeTeresa, R., Brown, T., Davies, P., Fuld, P., Renbing, X., & Peck, A. (1988) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410230206 · Cited by 1,225 · see citing works
Classification and prediction of clinical Alzheimer's diagnosis based on plasma signaling proteins
Ray, S., Britschgi, M., Herbert, C., Takeda-Uchimura, Y., Boxer, A., Blennow, K., Friedman, L. F., Galasko, D. R., Jutel, M., Karydas, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1653 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Self-citation[ <sup>11</sup> C]PIB in a nondemented population: Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease
Mintun, M. A., LaRossa, G. N., Sheline, Y. I., Dence, C. S., Lee, S. Y., Mach, R. H., Klunk, W. E., Mathis, C. A., DeKosky, S. T., & Morris, J. C. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Self-citationConsensus Recommendations for the Postmortem Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
(1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00057-2 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
Mandelkow, E., & Mandelkow, E. (1998) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01368-3 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Fagan, A. M., Roe, C. M., Xiong, C., Mintun, M. A., Morris, J. C., & Holtzman, D. M. (2007) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.64.3.noc60123 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive Reserve and Alzheimer Disease
Stern, Y. (2006) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/01.wad.0000213815.20177.19 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
Price, J. L., Davis, P. B., Morris, J. C., & White, D. L. (1991) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(91)90006-6 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Self-citationAltered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer's disease
Masliah, E., Mallory, M., Alford, M., DeTeresa, R., Hansen, L. A., McKeel, D. W., & Morris, J. C. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.1.127 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Preclinical Phase of Alzheimer Disease: A 22-Year Prospective Study of the Framingham Cohort
Elias, M. F., Beiser, A., Wolf, P. A., Au, R., White, R. F., & D'Agostino, R. B. (2000) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.57.6.808 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Observations on the brains of non-demented old people
Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., & Roth, M. (1968) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(68)90154-8 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Neuropathology of Cognitively Normal Elderly
Knopman, D. S., Parisi, J. E., Salviati, A., Floriach-Robert, M., Boeve, B. F., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., Dickson, D. W., Johnson, K. A., Petersen, L. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/62.11.1087 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Self-citationBerg, L., McKeel, D. W., Miller, J. P., Storandt, M., Rubin, E. H., Morris, J. C., Baty, J., Coats, M., Norton, J., Goate, A. M., et al. (1998) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.55.3.326 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of normal and pathological aging in prospectively studied nondemented elderly humans
Dickson, D. W., Crystal, H. A., Mattiace, L. A., Masur, D. M., Blau, A. D., Davies, P., Yen, S.-H., & Aronson, M. K. (1992) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(92)90027-u · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Self-citationArriagada, P. V., Marzloff, K., & Hyman, B. T. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.9.1681 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Morris, J. C., Storandt, M., McKeel, D. W., Rubin, E. H., Price, J. L., Grant, E. A., & Berg, L. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.46.3.707 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuron Number in the Entorhinal Cortex and CA1 in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Price, J. L., Ko, A. I., Wade, M. J., Tsou, S. K., McKeel, D. W., & Morris, J. C. (2001) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.58.9.1395 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Self-citationCrystal, H., Dickson, D., Fuld, P., Masur, D., Scott, R., Mehler, M., Masdeu, J., Kawas, C., Aronson, M., & Wolfson, L. (1988) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.38.11.1682 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Self-citationBennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., & Arnold, S. E. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.3.378 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
An analysis of certain psychological tests used for the evaluation of brain injury.
Armitage, S. G. (1946) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093567 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
“Preclinical” AD revisited: Neuropathology of cognitively normal older adults
Schmitt, F. A., Davis, D. G., Wekstein, D. R., Smith, C. D., Ashford, J. W., & Markesbery, W. R. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.3.370 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence that incidental Lewy body disease is pre-symptomatic Parkinson’s disease
Dickson, D. W., Fujishiro, H., DelleDonne, A., Menke, J., Ahmed, Z., Klos, K. J., Josephs, K. A., Frigerio, R., Burnett, M., Parisi, J. E., et al. (2008) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0345-7 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationHippocampal neurons in pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease.
West, M. J., Kawas, C. H., Stewart, W. F., Rudow, G. L., & Troncoso, J. C. (2004) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.12.005 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
HULETTE, C. M., WELSH-BOHMER, K. A., MURRAY, M. G., SAUNDERS, A. M., MASH, D. C., & MCINTYRE, L. M. (1998) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-199812000-00009 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Self-citationHaroutunian, V. (1998) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.55.9.1185 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Neuropsychological tests accurately predict incident Alzheimer disease after 5 and 10 years
Tierney, M. C., Yao, C., Kiss, A., & McDowell, I. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000163773.21794.0b · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Visual memory predicts Alzheimer's disease more than a decade before diagnosis
Kawas, C. H., Corrada, M. M., Brookmeyer, R., Morrison, A., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., & Arenberg, D. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000055813.36504.bf · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Fotenos, A. F., Mintun, M., Snyder, A., Morris, J., & Buckner, R. (2008) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2007.27 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationHung, L. W., Ciccotosto, G. D., Giannakis, E., Tew, D. J., Perez, K., Masters, C. L., Cappai, R., Wade, J. D., & Barnham, K. J. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3916-08.2008 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Neurofibrillary tangles in nondemented elderly subjects and mild Alzheimer disease
Haroutunian, V., Purohit, D. P., Perl, D. P., Marin, D., Khan, K., Lantz, M., Davis, K. L., & Mohs, R. C. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.6.713 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Neuronal Hypertrophy in Asymptomatic Alzheimer Disease
Iacono, D., O'Brien, R., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., Pletnikova, O., Rudow, G., An, Y., West, M. J., Crain, B., & Troncoso, J. C. (2008) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181772794 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Alzheimer disease pathology as a host response
Castellani, R. J., Lee, H.-G., Zhu, X., Perry, G., & Smith, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e318177eaf4 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Preclinical Alzheimer disease: Neuropsychological test performance 1.5 to 8 years prior to onset
Saxton, J., Lopez, O. L., Ratcliff, G., Dulberg, C., Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Newman, A. B., & Kuller, L. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000147470.58328.50 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
MIRRA, S. S., GEARING, M., MCKEEL, D. W., CRAIN, B. J., HUGHES, J. P., BELLE, G. V., & HEYMAN, A. (1994) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-199405000-00012 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationAbsence of cognitive impairment or decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Goldman, W. P., Price, J. L., Storandt, M., Grant, E., McKeel, D. W., Rubin, E. H., & Morris, J. C. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.3.361 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuropathology in controls and demented subjects from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Troncoso, J. C., Martin, L. J., Dal Forno, G., & Kawas, C. H. (1996) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(96)00028-0 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Impact of Alzheimer's pathology on cognitive trajectories in nondemented elderly
Driscoll, I., Resnick, S. M., Troncoso, J. C., An, Y., O'Brien, R., & Zonderman, A. B. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21031 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Alafuzoff, I., Pikkarainen, M., Al-Sarraj, S., Arzberger, T., Bell, J., Bodi, I., Bogdanovic, N., Budka, H., Bugiani, O., Ferrer, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/01.jnen.0000229986.17548.27 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Resistance to Alzheimer's pathology is associated with nuclear hypertrophy in neurons
Riudavets, M. A., Iacono, D., Resnick, S. M., O’Brien, R., Zonderman, A. B., Martin, L. J., Rudow, G., Pletnikova, O., & Troncoso, J. C. (2007) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.05.005 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Comparison of neuropathologic criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
Geddes, J. W., Tekirian, T. L., Soultanian, N. S., Ashford, J. W., Davis, D. G., & Markesbery, W. R. (1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00063-8 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuropathology of preclinical and clinical lateonset Alzheimer's disease
Troncoso, J. C., Cataldo, A. M., Nixon, R. A., Barnett, J. L., Lee, M. K., Checler, F., Fowler, D. R., Smialek, J. E., Crain, B., Martin, L. J., et al. (1998) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410430519 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Plasma amyloid β protein is elevated in late-onset Alzheimer disease families
Ertekin‐Taner, N., Younkin, L. H., Yager, D., Parfitt, F. C., Baker, M., Asthana, S., Hutton, M. L., Younkin, S. G., & Graff‐Radford, N. R. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000278386.00035.21 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
No disease in the brain of a 115 year old woman
den Dunnen, W. F. A., Brouwer, W. H., Bijlard, E., Kamphuis, J., van Linschoten, K., Eggens-Meijer, E., & Holstege, G. (2008) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.010 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
McKeel, D. W., Price, J. L., Miller, J. P., Grant, E. A., Xiong, C., Berg, L., & Morris, J. C. (2004) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/63.10.1028 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictors of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and Dementia: A Clinicopathologic Study
Galvin, J. E., Powlishta, K. K., Wilkins, K., McKeel, D. W., Xiong, C., Grant, E., Storandt, M., & Morris, J. C. (2005) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.62.5.758 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMismatch between plaques and tangles in staging Alzheimer pathology
Dickson, D. W. (1995) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(95)97325-b · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationBerlau, D. J., Kahle-Wrobleski, K., Head, E., Goodus, M., Kim, R., & Kawas, C. (2007) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.64.8.1193
Price (1999) · doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease
Serrano-Pozo, A., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., & Hyman, B. T. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006189 · Cited by 3,345 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 3,204 · see citing works
Hyman, B. T., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Carrillo, M. C., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Self-citationVillemagne, V. L., Burnham, S., Bourgeat, P., Brown, B., Ellis, K. A., Salvado, O., Szoeke, C., Macaulay, S. L., Martins, R., Maruff, P., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70044-9 · Cited by 2,279 · see citing works
Karran, E., Mercken, M., & Strooper, B. D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3505 · Cited by 2,188 · see citing works
Nelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
Self-citationAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Mueller, S. G., Weiner, M. W., Thal, L. J., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., Toga, A. W., & Beckett, L. A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72076-0_18 · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
Self-citationAlzheimer’s Disease: The Challenge of the Second Century
Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., & Goate, A. M. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002369 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Self-citationOxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease
Wang, X., Wang, W., Li, L., Perry, G., Lee, H.-G., & Zhu, X. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.10.015 · Cited by 1,357 · see citing works
Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project
Bennett, D. A., Buchman, A. S., Boyle, P. A., Barnes, L. L., Wilson, R. S., & Schneider, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-179939 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future
Blennow, K., & Zetterberg, H. (2018) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12816 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Association of Amyloid and Tau With Cognition in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Longitudinal Study
Hanseeuw, B. J., Betensky, R. A., Jacobs, H. I. L., Schultz, A. P., Sepulcre, J., Becker, J. A., Cosio, D. M. O., Farrell, M., Quiroz, Y. T., Mormino, E. C., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain
Gräff, J., Rei, D., Guan, J.-S., Wang, W.-Y., Seo, J., Hennig, K. M., Nieland, T. J. F., Fass, D. M., Kao, P. F., Kahn, M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10849 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Reconsideration of Amyloid Hypothesis and Tau Hypothesis in Alzheimer's Disease
Kametani, F., & Hasegawa, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00025 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
<i>APOE</i> predicts amyloid‐beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging
Morris, J. C., Roe, C. M., Xiong, C., Fagan, A. M., Goate, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., & Mintun, M. A. (2010) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21843 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Self-citationWhite matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease: A focus on myelin and oligodendrocytes
Nasrabady, S. E., Rizvi, B., Goldman, J. E., & Brickman, A. M. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-018-0515-3 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Multimodal techniques for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease
Perrin, R. J., Fagan, A. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08538 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Pathogenic protein seeding in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders
Jucker, M., & Walker, L. C. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22615 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
“Advancing age is the most prevalent risk factor for the accumulation of A β in the brain 10, 11 , possibly because of the decline of cellular protein quality control processes 12 .”
BackgroundIron neurochemistry in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease: targets for therapeutics
Belaidi, A. A., & Bush, A. I. (2015) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13425 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum
Aisen, P. S., Cummings, J., Jack, C. R., Morris, J. C., Sperling, R., Frölich, L., Jones, R. W., Dowsett, S. A., Matthews, B. R., Raskin, J., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-017-0283-5 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Self-citationBrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease
Gaser, C., Franke, K., Klöppel, S., Koutsouleris, N., Sauer, H., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067346 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Inconsistencies and Controversies Surrounding the Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease
Morris, G. P., Clark, I. A., & Vissel, B. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-014-0135-5 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Morris, J. C., Roe, C. M., Grant, E. A., Head, D., Storandt, M., Goate, A. M., Fagan, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., & Mintun, M. A. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.269 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Self-citationCircadian rest-activity pattern changes in aging and preclinical Alzheimer disease
Musiek, E. S., Bhimasani, M., Zangrilli, M. A., Morris, J. C., Holtzman, D. M., & Ju, Y.-E. S. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4719 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Self-citationA Plaque-Specific Antibody Clears Existing β-amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer's Disease Mice
DeMattos, R. B., Lu, J., Tang, Y., Racke, M. M., DeLong, C. A., Tzaferis, J. A., Hole, J. T., Forster, B. M., McDonnell, P. C., Liu, F., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Jun, G. (2010) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.201 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
β-Amyloid burden in healthy aging: Regional distribution and cognitive consequences
Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., Devous, M. D., Rieck, J. R., Hebrank, A. C., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Mathews, D., & Park, D. C. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318245d295 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Probing the biology of Alzheimer’s disease in mice
Ashe, K. H., & Zahs, K. R. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.031 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Alzheimer-signature MRI biomarker predicts AD dementia in cognitively normal adults
Dickerson, B. C., Stoub, T. R., Shah, R. C., Sperling, R. A., Killiany, R., Albert, M., Hyman, B. T., Blacker, D., & deToledo‐Morrell, L. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182166e96 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Functional connectivity and graph theory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease
Brier, M. R., Thomas, J., Fagan, A. M., Hassenstab, J. J., Holtzman, D. M., Benzinger, T. L. S., Morris, J. C., & Ances, B. M. (2013) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.081 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citationResistance vs resilience to Alzheimer disease
Arenaza‐Urquijo, E. M., & Vemuri, P. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005303 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Nelson, P. T., Head, E., Schmitt, F. A., Davis, P. R., Neltner, J. H., Jicha, G. A., Abner, E. L., Smith, C. D., Van Eldik, L. J., Kryscio, R. J., et al. (2011) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0826-y · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationCan Alzheimer disease be prevented by amyloid-β immunotherapy?
Lemere, C. A., & Masliah, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.219 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Neuroimaging markers for the prediction and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia
Ewers, M., Sperling, R. A., Klunk, W. E., Weiner, M. W., & Hampel, H. J. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.05.005 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Olfactory deficits predict cognitive decline and Alzheimer dementia in an urban community
Devanand, D. P., Lee, S., Manly, J. J., Andrews, H., Schupf, N., Doty, R. L., Stern, Y., Zahodne, L. B., Louis, E. D., & Mayeux, R. P. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001132 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Wang, W.-X., Huang, Q., Hu, Y., Stromberg, A. J., & Nelson, P. T. (2011) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0756-0 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Njie, E. G., Boelen, E., Stassen, F. R., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Borchelt, D. R., & Streit, W. J. (2012) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.008 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Prevalence of dementia subtypes in United States Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries, 2011–2013
Goodman, R. A., Lochner, K. A., Thambisetty, M., Wingo, T. S., Posner, S. F., & Ling, S. M. (2016) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.04.002 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Murray, M. E., Lowe, V. J., Graff-Radford, N. R., Liesinger, A. M., Cannon, A., Przybelski, S. A., Rawal, B., Parisi, J. E., Petersen, R. C., Kantarci, K., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv050 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationInnovative diagnostic tools for early detection of Alzheimer's disease
Laske, C., Sohrabi, H. R., Frost, S. M., López-de-Ipiña, K., Garrard, P., Buscema, M., Dauwels, J., Soekadar, S. R., Mueller, S., Linnemann, C., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.004 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Amyloid‐beta oligomerization in Alzheimer dementia versus high‐pathology controls
Esparza, T. J., Zhao, H., Cirrito, J. R., Cairns, N. J., Bateman, R. J., Holtzman, D. M., & Brody, D. L. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23748 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Storandt, M., Mintun, M. A., Head, D. M., & Morris, J. C. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.272 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Self-citationThe amyloid cascade hypothesis: an updated critical review
Kepp, K. P., Robakis, N. K. R. K., Høilund‐Carlsen, P. F., Sensi, S. L., & Vissel, B. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad159 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease
Aschenbrenner, A. J., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Morris, J. C., & Hassenstab, J. J. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006075 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measured by Elecsys assays compared to amyloid imaging
Schindler, S. E., Gray, J. D., Gordon, B. A., Xiong, C., Batrla‐Utermann, R., Quan, M., Wahl, S., Benzinger, T. L. S., Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.013 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationSimon, M. J., Wang, M. X., Ismail, O., Braun, M., Schindler, A. G., Reemmer, J., Wang, Z., Haveliwala, M. A., O’Boyle, R. P., Han, W., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-022-00999-5 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Novel advances in shotgun lipidomics for biology and medicine
Wang, M., Wang, C., Han, R. H., & Han, X. (2015) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2015.12.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Shaw, L. M., Arias, J., Blennow, K., Galasko, D., Molinuevo, J. L., Salloway, S., Schindler, S., Carrillo, M. C., Hendrix, J. A., Ross, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.220 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Non-invasive assessment of Alzheimer’s disease neurofibrillary pathology using 18F-THK5105 PET
Okamura, N., Furumoto, S., Fodero‐Tavoletti, M. T., Mulligan, R. S., Harada, R., Yates, P. A., Pejoska, S., Kudo, Y., Masters, C. L., Yanai, K., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu064 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Mild cognitive impairment: pathology and mechanisms
Mufson, E. J., Binder, L. I., Counts, S., DeKosky, S. T., deToledo‐Morrell, L., Ginsberg, S. D., Ikonomović, M. D., Perez, S. E., & Scheff, S. W. (2011) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0884-1 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Bakkour, A., Morris, J. C., Wolk, D. A., & Dickerson, B. C. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.059 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationMRI cortical thickness biomarker predicts AD-like CSF and cognitive decline in normal adults
Dickerson, B. C., & Wolk, D. A. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31823efc6c · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Coric, V., Salloway, S., van Dyck, C. H., Dubois, B., Andreasen, N., Brody, M., Curtis, C., Soininen, H., Thein, S., Shiovitz, T., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Driver of Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease
Sharma, C., Kim, S., Nam, Y., Jung, U. J., & Kim, S. R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22094850 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Chang, C.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Lane, H.-Y. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22052761 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Drachman, D. A. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.11.003 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Relation of neuropathology to cognition in persons without cognitive impairment
Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Boyle, P. A., Buchman, A. S., & Schneider, J. A. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23654 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Dysfunctional Mitochondria and Mitophagy as Drivers of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis
Chakravorty, A., Jetto, C. T., & Manjithaya, R. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00311 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Lu, Y., Dong, Y., Tucker, D., Wang, R., Ahmed, M. E., Brann, D. W., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160869 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Morris, G. P., Clark, I. A., & Vissel, B. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1918-8 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Spatial Navigation in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease
Allison, S. L., Fagan, A. M., Morris, J. C., & Head, D. M. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150855 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationMorris, J. C., Aisen, P. S. S., Bateman, R. J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Cairns, N. J., Fagan, A. M., Ghetti, B. F., Goate, A., Holtzman, D. M., Klunk, W. E., et al. (2012) · Clinical Investigation · doi:10.4155/cli.12.93 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical practice. Early Alzheimer's disease.
Mayeux, R. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp0910236 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Altered Proteins in the Aging Brain
Elobeid, A., Libard, S., Leino, M., Popova, S. N., & Alafuzoff, I. (2016) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/nlw002 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Amyloid-β and Tau at the Crossroads of Alzheimer’s Disease
Gallardo, G., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_16 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Network Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: Refining the Disconnection Hypothesis
Brier, M. R., Thomas, J., & Ances, B. M. (2014) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2014.0236 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Lipidomics of Human Brain Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Pathology
Naudí, A., Cabré, R., Jové, M., Ayala, V., Gonzalo‐Benito, H., Portero‐Otín, M., Ferrer, I., & Pamplona, R. (2015) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2015.05.008 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Rapidly Progressive Alzheimer Disease
Schmidt, C., Wolff, M., Weitz, M., Bartlau, T., Korth, C., & Zerr, I. (2011) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.189 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-reported memory complaints
Kryscio, R. J., Abner, E. L., Cooper, G. E., Fardo, D. W., Jicha, G. A., Nelson, P. T., Smith, C. D., Eldik, L. J. V., Wan, L., & Schmitt, F. A. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000856 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationFagan, A. M., Shaw, L. M. J., Xiong, C., Vanderstichele, H., Mintun, M. A., Trojanowski, J. Q., Coart, E., Morris, J. C., & Holtzman, D. M. (2011) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.105 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationMorris, J. C. (2012) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.3152 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationPET amyloid-beta imaging in preclinical Alzheimer's disease
Vlassenko, A. G., Benzinger, T. L. S., & Morris, J. C. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.11.005 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationZahs, K. R., & Ashe, K. H. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.05.004 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Circadian and sleep dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease
Uddin, M. S., Tewari, D., Mamun, A. A., Kabir, M. T., Niaz, K., Wahed, M. I. I., Barreto, G. E., & Ashraf, G. M. (2020) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101046 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Ecology of the Aging Human Brain
Sonnen, J. A. (2011) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.157 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Ferrer, I. (2012) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.03.005 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Synaptic pathology: A shared mechanism in neurological disease
Henstridge, C. M., Pickett, E. K., & Spires‐Jones, T. L. (2016) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2016.04.005 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Age-Related Changes in the Thickness of Cortical Zones in Humans
McGinnis, S. M., Brickhouse, M. J., Pascual, B., & Dickerson, B. C. (2011) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-011-0198-6 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Glucose Transport Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease
Kyrtata, N., Emsley, H. C. A., Sparasci, O., Parkes, L. M., & Dickie, B. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.626636 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Hippocampal plasticity during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease
Mufson, E. J., Mahady, L. J., Waters, D., Counts, S., Perez, S. E., DeKosky, S. T., Ginsberg, S. D., Ikonomović, M. D., Scheff, S. W., & Binder, L. I. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.006 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Tse, C., Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J.-M., Duchek, J. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2010) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0018274 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Increased Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Activity in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bruno, M. A., Mufson, E. J., Wuu, J., & Cuello, A. C. (2009) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181c22569 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Weidenheim, K. M., Dickson, D. W., & Rapin, I. (2009) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2009.07.006 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges of multimorbidity of the aging brain: a critical update
Jellinger, K. A., & Attems, J. (2015) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-014-1288-x · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Dystrophic microglia in late‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Streit, W. J., Khoshbouei, H., & Bechmann, I. (2020) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23782 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s disease: How metal ions define β-amyloid function
Kepp, K. P. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.05.007 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
The Past and the Future of Alzheimer’s Disease Fluid Biomarkers
Blennow, K., & Zetterberg, H. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-170773 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
de la Torre, J. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-180004 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Fortea, J., Vilaplana, E., Alcolea, D. A., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Sánchez‐Saudinós, M., Sala, I., Antón‐Aguirre, S., González‐Ortiz, S., Medrano, S., Pegueroles, J., et al. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24186 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Cognitive and social lifestyle: links with neuropathology and cognition in late life
Bennett, D. A., Arnold, S. E., Valenzuela, M., Brayne, C., & Schneider, J. A. (2013) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1226-2 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network: facilitating research and clinical trials
Moulder, K. L., Snider, B., Mills, S. L., Buckles, V. D., Santacruz, A. M., Bateman, R. J., & Morris, J. C. (2013) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt213 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationCharacterization of AZD4694, a novel fluorinated Aβ plaque neuroimaging PET radioligand
Juréus, A., Swahn, B., Sandell, J., Jeppsson, F., Johnson, A. E., Johnström, P., Neelissen, J. A. M., Sunnemark, D., Farde, L., & Svensson, S. (2010) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06812.x · Cited by 140 · see citing works
The neuropathological profile of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a systematic review
Stephan, B. C. M., Hunter, S., Harris, D., Llewellyn, D. J., Siervo, M., Matthews, F. E., & Brayne, C. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2011.147 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Buchholz, S., & Zempel, H. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13784 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism associated with tau‐amyloid interaction predicts memory decline
Hanseeuw, B. J., Betensky, R. A., Schultz, A. P., Papp, K. V., Mormino, E. C., Sepulcre, J., Bark, J. S., Cosio, D. M., LaPoint, M., Chhatwal, J. P., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24910 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Absence of practice effects in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.
Hassenstab, J. J., Ruvolo, D., Jasielec, M. S., Xiong, C., Grant, E., & Morris, J. C. (2015) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000208 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationKadir, A., Marutle, A., Gonzalez, D., Schöll, M., Almkvist, O., Mousavi, M. T., Mustafiz, T., Darreh‐Shori, T., Nennesmo, I., & Nordberg, A. K. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq349 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Vana, L., Kanaan, N. M., Ugwu, I. C., Wuu, J., Mufson, E. J., & Binder, L. I. (2011) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.044 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Resting bold fMRI differentiates dementia with Lewy bodies vs Alzheimer disease
Galvin, J. E., Price, J. L., Yan, Z., Morris, J. C., & Sheline, Y. I. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821ccc83 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationStabilizing ER Ca2+ Channel Function as an Early Preventative Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease
Chakroborty, S., Briggs, C. A., Miller, M. B., Goussakov, I. V., Schneider, C., Kim, J. S., Wicks, J. M., Richardson, J. C., Conklin, V., Cameransi, B. G., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052056 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
- Authors
- Price, J. L., McKeel, D. W., Buckles, V. D., Roe, C. M., Xiong, C., Grundman, M., Hansen, L. A., Petersen, R. C., Parisi, J. E., Dickson, D. W., Smith, C. D., Davis, D. G., Schmitt, F. A., Markesbery, W. R., Kaye, J., Kurlan, R., Hulette, C., Kurland, B. F., Higdon, R., Kukull, W., & Morris, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Ireland) (IE)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Central Baptist Hospital (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morris, John C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1026-1036
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2737680
- OpenAlex
- W2114222094
- Semantic Scholar
- 56b77cd6ec3334e93ca55ab8412c4c9a608abbd6
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG028383, P30AG028377, U01AG016976, P50AG005131, P30AG008017, U01-AG 16976, P 50 AG05681, P50AG005681, P01 AG0 3991, P01AG003991, P30AG008665, P01AG026276, P50AG016574)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- preclinical Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease pathology, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, cognitive impairment, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics as Topic, Linear Models, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Age Distribution, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review