The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A distributed event-triggered transmission strategy for sampled-data consensus of multi-agent systems
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This paper is concerned with event-triggered sampled-data consensus for distributed multi-agent systems with directed graph. A novel distributed event-triggered sampled-data transmission strategy is proposed, which allows the event-triggering condition to be intermittently examined at constant sampling instants. Based on this novel strategy, a sampled-data consensus control protocol is presented, with which the consensus of distributed multi-agent systems can be transformed into the stability of a system with a time-varying delay. Then, a sufficient condition on the consensus of the multi-agent system is derived. Correspondingly, a co-design algorithm for obtaining both the parameters of the distributed event-triggered transmission strategy and the consensus controller gain is proposed. Two numerical examples are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies
Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2005.846556 · Cited by 6,569
Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks
Tabuada, P. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.904277 · Cited by 4,702
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Consensus of Multiagent Systems and Synchronization of Complex Networks: A Unified Viewpoint
Li, Z., Duan, Z., Chen, G., & Huang, L. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2009.2023937 · Cited by 2,400
On Consensus Algorithms for Double-Integrator Dynamics
Ren, W. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.924961 · Cited by 1,413
Some necessary and sufficient conditions for second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems
Yu, W., Chen, G., & Cao, M. (2010) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,390
Event-based broadcasting for multi-agent average consensus
Seyboth, G. S., Dimarogonas, D. V., & Johansson, K. H. (2013) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.08.042 · Cited by 1,233
A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control
Fridman, E. (2010) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.11.017 · Cited by 1,178
Event-Triggering in Distributed Networked Control Systems
Wang, X., & Lemmon, M. D. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2057951 · Cited by 1,171
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Consensusability of Linear Multi-Agent Systems
Ma, C.-Q., & Zhang, J.-F. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2042764 · Cited by 752
Decentralized Event-Triggered Control Over Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks
Mazo, M., & Tabuada, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2164036 · Cited by 691
Self-Triggered Feedback Control Systems With Finite-Gain ${\cal L}_{2}$ Stability
Wang, X., & Lemmon, M. D. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2012973 · Cited by 666
You, K., & Xie, L. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2164017 · Cited by 622
Second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems with sampled position data
Yu, W., Zheng, W. X., Chen, G., Ren, W., & Cao, J. (2011) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.027 · Cited by 526
An ISS self-triggered implementation of linear controllers
Mazo, M., Anta, A., & Tabuada, P. (2010) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.05.009 · Cited by 420
Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems in Directed Networks With Nonuniform Time-Varying Delays
Sun, Y. G., & Wang, L. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2017963 · Cited by 397
Cao, Y., & Ren, W. (2010) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1495 · Cited by 253
Liu, H., Xie, G., & Wang, L. (2010) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1543 · Cited by 185
Hayakawa, T., Matsuzawat, T., & Hara, S. (2006) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2006.377708 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Zhang, X.-M., Han, Q.-L., & Zhang, B.-L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2607150 · Cited by 772
Self-citationEvent-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Adaptive Consensus Control of Linear Multiagent Systems With Dynamic Event-Triggered Strategies
He, W., Xu, B., Han, Q.-L., & Qian, F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2019.2920093 · Cited by 533
Self-citationZhu, Q. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2018.2882067 · Cited by 486
Ding, D., Wang, Z., Ho, D. W. C., & Wei, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2582802 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, G., Ding, L., & Han, Q.-L.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1489-1496
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995500782
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 77.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
