Cited by 297Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressRedox biology and oxidative stressPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation in clinical material

Niki, Etsuo·2014·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

Abstract

Background Free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation has been implicated in a number of human diseases. Diverse methods have been developed and applied to measure lipid peroxidation products as potential biomarkers to assess oxidative stress status in vivo, discover early indication of disease, diagnose progression of disease, and evaluate the effectiveness of drugs and antioxidants for treatment of disease and maintenance of health, respectively. However, standardized methods are not yet established. Scope of review Characteristics of various lipid peroxidation products as biomarkers are reviewed on the basis of mechanisms and dynamics of their formation and metabolism and also on the methods of measurement, with an emphasis on the advantages and limitations. Major conclusions Lipid hydroxides such as hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids (HODE), hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETE), and hydroxycholesterols may be recommended as reliable biomarkers. Notably, the four HODEs, 9-cis,trans, 9-trans,trans, 13-cis,trans, and 13-trans,trans-HODE, can be measured separately by LC-MS/MS and the trans,trans-forms are specific marker of free radical mediated lipid peroxidation. Further, isoprostanes and neuroprostanes are useful biomarker of lipid peroxidation. It is important to examine the distribution and temporal change of these biomarkers. General significance Despite the fact that lipid peroxidation products are non-specific biomarkers, they will enable to assess oxidative stress status, d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.020

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TBARS assay is unspecific and measures total oxidative stress rather than MDA alone.

    “This approach is the method of choice for the quantification of free MDA due to simplicity and low costs, but is often criticized as being unspecific and rather measuring total oxidative stress instead of MDA alone [181,182].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niki, E.
Affiliations
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Niki, Etsuo
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
1840
Issue
2
Pages
809-817
ISSN
0304-4165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989877335
Cited by
297
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
lipid peroxidation, biomarkers, oxidative stress, hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids, hydroxycholesterol, isoprostanes, neuroprostanes, antioxidants
MeSH terms
Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Lipid Peroxidation, Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review