Cited by 198Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Disambiguating the similar: The dentate gyrus and pattern separation

Schmidt, Brandy, Marrone, Diano F., Markus, Etan J.·2012·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

The human hippocampus supports the formation of episodic memory without confusing new memories with old ones. To accomplish this, the brain must disambiguate memories (i.e., accentuate the differences between experiences). There is convergent evidence linking pattern separation to the dentate gyrus. Damage to the dentate gyrus reduces an organism's ability to differentiate between similar objects. The dentate gyrus has tenfold more principle cells than its cortical input, allowing for a divergence in information flow. Dentate gyrus granule neurons also show a very different pattern of representing the environment than "classic" place cells in CA1 and CA3, or grid cells in the entorhinal cortex. More recently immediate early genes have been used to "timestamp" activity of individual cells throughout the dentate gyrus. These data indicate that the dentate gyrus robustly differentiates similar situations. The degree of differentiation is non-linear, with even small changes in input inducing a near maximal response in the dentate. Furthermore this differentiation occurs throughout the dentate gyrus longitudinal (dorsal-ventral) axis. Conversely, the data point to a divergence in information processing between the dentate gyrus suprapyramidal and infrapyramidal blades possibly related to differences in organization within these regions. The accumulated evidence from different approaches converges to support a role for the dentate gyrus in pattern separation. There are however inco…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.039

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DG subregion of the hippocampus mediates episodic memory formation and disambiguation of similar but discrete events (pattern separation).

    “The dentate gyrus (DG) subregion of the hippocampus mediates episodic memory formation and the disambiguation of similar but discrete events, a phenomenon known as pattern separation [3], [4], [5], [6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, B., Marrone, D. F., & Markus, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Markus, Etan J.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
226
Issue
1
Pages
56-65
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066020682
Cited by
198
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dentate gyrus, pattern separation, hippocampus, episodic memory, memory disambiguation, granule cells, place cells, grid cells, immediate early genes, CA3, neurogenesis, spatial representation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neurons, Dentate Gyrus, Neurogenesis, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review