Cited by 19Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

Use of incidentally encoded memory from a single experience in cats

Takagi, Saho, Tsuzuki, Mana, Chijiiwa, Hitomi, Arahori, Minori, Watanabe, Arii, Saito, Atsuko, Fujita, Kazuo·2017·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

We examined whether cats could retrieve and utilize incidentally encoded information from a single past event in a simple food-exploration task previously used for dogs (Fujita et al., 2012). In Experiment 1, cats were led to four open, baited containers and allowed to eat from two of them (Exposure phase). After a 15-min delay during which the cats were absent and all containers were replaced with empty ones, the cats were unexpectedly returned to the room and allowed to explore the containers (Test phase). Although the cats' first choice of container to visit was random, they explored containers from which they had not previously eaten for longer than those from which they did previously eat. In the Exposure phase of Experiment 2, two containers held food, one held a nonedible object, and the fourth was empty. Cats were allowed to eat from one of them. In the post-delay Test phase, the cats first visited the remaining baited-uneaten container significantly more often than chance and they spent more time exploring this container. Because the cats' behavior in the Test phase cannot be explained by association of the container with a pleasant experience (eating), the results suggest that cats retrieved and utilized "what" and "where" information from an incidentally encoded memory from a single experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple non-human species are able to encode and recall incidental information within remembered events.

    “These studies demonstrate that multiple non-human species are able to encode and recall incidental information within remembered events, such as spatial locations [80,81,83,93,97,98], visual markers [92], the identity of experimenters [83], the presence (or absence) of food [74,82], odour cues [94], as well as aspects of their own [79–81,93,95] and other’s behaviour [96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [98]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takagi, S., Tsuzuki, M., Chijiiwa, H., Arahori, M., Watanabe, A., Saito, A., & Fujita, K.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Musashino University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takagi, Saho
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
141
Issue
Pt 3
Pages
267-272
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570608015
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (25240020, 26119514, 16H01505, 16H06301)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25118003, JP16J08691, JP16J1034)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
cats, incidental memory, memory retrieval, spatial memory, object memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Choice Behavior, Female, Food, Male, Memory, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review