Cited by 154Cephalopods and Marine BiologyMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish

Open access
Jozet-Alves, Christelle, Bertin, Marion, Clayton, Nicola S.·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

The recollection of past experiences allows us to recall what happened during a particular event, and where and when it occurred [1]. Since the first study on episodic-like memory in scrub-jays [2], there has been widespread acceptance of the idea that tests in animals should integrate the 'what', 'where' and 'when' components of a unique event that occurred in the past [3,4]. This is referred to as episodic-like memory rather than episodic memory per se, in acknowledgement of the lack of evidence for, or against, the phenomenological aspects that accompany episodic recollection in humans. So far, evidence for episodic-like memory has only been found in some birds and mammals. We show here that cuttlefish, cephalopod mollusks, keep track of what they have eaten, and where and how long ago they ate, in order to match their foraging behavior with the time of replenishing of different foods. Foraging in cuttlefish fulfils the criteria of 'what', 'where' and 'when' of unique events and thus provides behavioral evidence of episodic-like memory in an invertebrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.021

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory, such as pecking or approaching shapes or coloured panels, or requiring subjects to recall their own or others' previous actions out of an array of behaviours.

    “Some studies, however, use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory [75], such as pecking or approaching certain shapes or coloured panels that are presented in front of the subjects [56,78–81], or requiring subjects to recall their own or others’ previous actions out of an array of behaviours [95,96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jozet-Alves, C., Bertin, M., & Clayton, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Normandie Université (FR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
23
Issue
23
Pages
R1033-R1035
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010074622
Cited by
154
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
episodic-like memory, cuttlefish, cephalopods, foraging behavior, invertebrate cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Feeding Behavior, Learning, Mental Recall, Sepia, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review