Cited by 139Memory Processes and InfluencesPrimate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning Development

What–Where–When memory in magpies (Pica pica)

Zinkivskay, Ann, Nazir, Farrah, Smulders, Tom V.·2009·Animal Cognition

Abstract

Some animals have been shown to be able to remember which type of food they hoarded or encountered in which location and how long ago (what-where-when memory). In this study, we test whether magpies (Pica pica) also show evidence of remembering these different aspects of a past episode. Magpies hid red- and blue-dyed pellets of scrambled eggs in a large tray containing wood shavings. They were allowed to make as many caches as they wanted. The birds were then returned either the same day or the next day to retrieve the pellets. If they returned the same day, one colour of pellets was replaced with wooden beads of similar size and colour, while if they returned the next day this would happen to the other colour. Over just a few trials, the birds learned to only search for the food pellets, and ignore the beads, of the appropriate colour for the given retention interval. A probe trial in which all items were removed showed that the birds persisted in searching for the pellets and not the beads. This shows that magpies can remember which food item they hoarded where, and when, even if the food items only differ from each other in their colour and are dispersed throughout a continuous caching substrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-008-0176-x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the evidence for episodic-like memory in birds, particularly using the what-where-when paradigm, has revolved around food caching in species highly specialized in this behaviour: scrub-jays, Eurasian jays, magpies, and black-capped chickadees.

    “Much of the evidence for episodic-like memory in birds, particularly using the what–where–when paradigm, has revolved around food caching in species that are highly specialized in this behaviour, namely scrub-jays [52,59,60], Eurasian jays [92], magpies [61] and black-capped chickadees [62].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinkivskay, A., Nazir, F., & Smulders, T. V.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Smulders, Tom V.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W2060900107
Cited by
139
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/S/H/2005/12030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
magpies, Eurasian magpie, food caching, food hoarding, spatial memory, temporal memory, color discrimination
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Female, Male, Retention, Psychology, Spatial Behavior, Recognition, Psychology, Crows

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review