Cited by 307Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Emotional Eating and Weight in Adults: A Review

Frayn, Mallory, Knäuper, Bärbel·2018·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-017-9577-9

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frayn, M., & Knäuper, B.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Frayn, Mallory
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2017-03-15
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
924-933
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2608809495
Cited by
307
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
emotional eating, weight gain, weight loss, weight loss maintenance, eating behavior assessment, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, eating disorder intervention, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review