Cited by 149Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Research TopicsChaos, Complexity, and Education

A complex systems approach to the study of change in psychotherapy

Open access
Hayes, Adele M., Andrews, Leigh A.·2020·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research highlights the limitations of traditional methods for studying the process of change in psychotherapy. The science of complex systems offers a useful paradigm for studying patterns of psychopathology and the development of more functional patterns in psychotherapy. Some basic principles of change are presented from subdisciplines of complexity science that are particularly relevant to psychotherapy: dynamical systems theory, synergetics, and network theory. Two early warning signs of system transition that have been identified across sciences (critical fluctuations and critical slowing) are also described. The network destabilization and transition (NDT) model of therapeutic change is presented as a conceptual framework to import these principles to psychotherapy research and to suggest future research directions. DISCUSSION: A complex systems approach has a number of implications for psychotherapy research. We describe important design considerations, targets for research, and analytic tools that can be used to conduct this type of research. CONCLUSIONS: A complex systems approach to psychotherapy research is both viable and necessary to more fully capture the dynamics of human change processes. Research to date suggests that the process of change in psychotherapy can be nonlinear and that periods of increased variability and critical slowing might be early warning signals of transition in psychotherapy, as they are in other systems in nature. Psychotherapy research has been limited by small samples and infrequent assessment, but ambulatory and electronic methods now allow researchers to more fully realize the potential of concepts and methods from complexity science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-020-01662-2

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modeling downstream mechanisms will likely require complex approaches such as network analytic frameworks.

    “Modeling downstream mechanisms will likely require complex approaches such as network analytic frameworks”

    From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Hayes & Andrews, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Tschacher W, Schiepek G, Brunner EJ, editors. Self-organization and clinical psychology. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1992. 366 p. (Springer Series in Synergetics).
  2. [90]Hayes AM, Andrews LA. Early warning signs and the study of transitions in psychotherapy. In: Viol K, Schöller H, editors. Self-organization: a paradigm for the human sciences? New York: Springer Publishing Company. in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, A. M., & Andrews, L. A.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Adele M.
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2020-07-14
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
197-197
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042416448
Cited by
149
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R21-MH062662, R01-MH086558)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Keywords
psychotherapeutic change, complex systems, dynamical systems theory, synergetics, network theory, critical slowing down, critical fluctuations, early warning indicators, system transition, nonlinear dynamics, psychopathology, ambulatory assessment, digital assessment
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Feedback, Humans, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review