Cited by 93Mental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: A proof-of-principle study

Open access
Kroeze, Renske, van der Veen, Date C., Servaas, Michelle N., Bastiaansen, Jojanneke A., Voshaar, Richard C. Oude Voshaar, Borsboom, Denny, Ruhe, Henricus G., Schoevers, Robert A. +1 more·2017·Journal for Person-Oriented Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the proposed symptom network approach to psychopathology, psychiatric disorders are assumed to result from the (causal) interplay between symptoms. By implementing this approach we explored whether individual feedback on symptom dynamics complements current categorical classification and treatment. The aim of this proof-of-principle case-study was to explore the feasibility, acceptability and usability of this transdiagnostic approach. METHODS: A female patient, aged 67, suffering from treatment resistant anxious and depressive symptoms was treated in our tertiary outpatient clinic for old age psychiatry. She participated in ecological momentary assessments (EMA), which involved intensive repeated measurements of mood and context-related items during two weeks. Visualizations of the interplay between the items were provided by network graphs and were discussed with the patient. RESULTS: Network graphs were discussed with the patient. For example, it was hypothesized and discussed with the patient that feeling relaxed increased physical activity, causing physical discomfort in the following hours. Physical discomfort caused stress as its symptoms resembled her feared somatic anxiety symptoms. This increased the patient's insight that stress, expressed as somatic symptoms, played a central role in her panic disorder. This started a dialogue on how to cope with stress caused by somatic (anxiety) symptoms and provided a rationale for the patient to start an interoceptive exposure intervention she had repeatedly refused before. LIMITATIONS: The observed symptom dynamics may not be generalizable to any other random two weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized diagnosis of psychopathology incorporating complex symptom dynamics is feasible and a promising addition to current categorical diagnostic systems and could guide intervention selection. This merits further exploration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17505/jpor.2017.01

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Epskamp S., Cramer A. O. J., Waldorp L. J., Schmittermann V. D., & Borsboom D (2012). Qgraph; network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1- 18.
  2. Sytema S., & Van der Krieke L (2013). Routine outcome monitoring: A tool to improve the quality of mental health care? In Thornicroft G, Ruggeri M & Goldberg D (Eds.), Improving mental health care: The global challenge (1st ed, pp. 246- 263). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroeze, R., van der Veen, D. C., Servaas, M. N., Bastiaansen, J. A., Voshaar, R. C. O. V., Borsboom, D., Ruhe, H. G., Schoevers, R. A., & Riese, H.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Published
2017-11-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
2002-0244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766008849
Cited by
93
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
14.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal for Person-Oriented Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personalized diagnosis, symptom dynamics, transdiagnostic psychiatry, ecological momentary assessment, network graphs, personalized feedback, interoceptive exposure, panic disorder, somatic anxiety, stress, physical activity, older adults, treatment-resistant depression, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review