Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model
Open accessAbstract
Current strategies to limit macrophage adhesion, fusion and fibrous capsule formation in the foreign body response have focused on modulating material surface properties. We hypothesize that topography close to biological scale, in the micron and nanometric range, provides a passive approach without bioactive agents to modulate macrophage behavior. In our study, topography-induced changes in macrophage behavior was examined using parallel gratings (250 nm-2 mum line width) imprinted on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS). RAW 264.7 cell adhesion and elongation occurred maximally on 500 nm gratings compared to planar controls over 48 h. TNF-alpha and VEGF secretion levels by RAW 264.7 cells showed greatest sensitivity to topographical effects, with reduced levels observed on larger grating sizes at 48 h. In vivo studies at 21 days showed reduced macrophage adhesion density and degree of high cell fusion on 2 mum gratings compared to planar controls. It was concluded that topography affects macrophage behavior in the foreign body response on all polymer surfaces examined. Topography-induced changes, independent of surface chemistry, did not reveal distinctive patterns but do affect cell morphology and cytokine secretion in vitro, and cell adhesion in vivo particularly on larger size topography compared to planar controls.
Verified 2026-10-05 · 1 reference not checked yet
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The rise in R-ratio was correlated with a larger sub-population of cells that became elongated, defined as R ≥ 2.5 and aligned within 30° of the gratings.
“The observed increase in R-ratio correlated with an increase in sub-population of cells attaining the elongated morphology, defined as having R ≥ 2.5 and aligned within 30° of the parallel gratings (Figure 4 B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RAW 264.7 cell adhesion and elongation were maximal on 500 nm gratings compared with planar controls over 48 hours.
“RAW 264.7 cell adhesion and elongation occurred maximally on 500 nm gratings compared to planar controls over 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The MCP-1 secretion profile followed the same trend as TNF-α secretion.
“Similarly, the MCP-1 secretion profile shared the same trend as TNF-α secretion (Figure 6 C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Elongated cells made up less than 25% of the total cell population on each topography.
“While the fraction of elongated cells on each topography was small (less than 25% of total cell population), statistical significance was observed on 250 nm and 2 μm PCL gratings compared to planar control (*p<0.05), and on 500 nm gratings (**p<0.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The low average R-ratio of all adherent cells, below 2, resulted from round cells predominating in the 1.2 to 1.6 R-ratio sub-population.
“The low average R-ratio of all adherent cells (R<2, Figure 5 I) was due to the round cells predominating in the sub-population (1.2<R<1.6, Figure 5 I, inset).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Elongated cells had a higher R-ratio, above 3.
“However, the elongated cells had a higher R-ratio (R>3, Figure 5 J).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Macrophages and foreign body giant cells adhered and fused on every grating sample at both 7 and 21 days.
“Macrophage adhesion and foreign body giant cell (FBGC) fusion were present on all grating samples at Day 7 (Figure 7 A, C, E) and Day 21 (Figure 7 B, D, F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Average R-ratios on PCL gratings imprinted on glass were comparable to those on Mylar, except for 250 nm gratings.
“The average R-ratio of adherent cells on PCL gratings imprinted on glass was comparable to that of PCL gratings on Mylar, except for 250 nm gratings (#p<0.01) (Figure 4 C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Macrophages elongated along the grating direction on PCL gratings imprinted on glass with widths of 2 μm, 500 nm, and 250 nm.
“Similarly, macrophages elongated in the direction of gratings on three different widths of PCL gratings imprinted on glass: 2 μm (Figure 3 E), 500 nm (Figure 3 F), and 250 nm (Figure 3 G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells clearly elongated along the grating direction on 2 μm PLA gratings.
“Only on the 2 μm PLA gratings did the cells clearly elongate in the direction of gratings (left portion), as illustrated by the immunostained F-actin (green) and nuclei (blue) of the cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells remained round on planar controls of glass, planar PCL film, and tissue culture polystyrene.
“In contrast, cells retained their native round shape on planar controls of glass (Figure 3 H), planar PCL film (Figure 3 I) and tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS, Figure 3 J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nanoimprint lithography successfully produced various patterns on glass and Mylar.
“NIL was successfully applied to fabricate various patterns on glass and Mylar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fusion rose on all surfaces by day 21.
“At Day 21, fusion increased on all surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No clear patterns of cell elongation or alignment with the topographical substrates appeared at either day 7 or day 21.
“No distinct patterns of cell elongation and alignment to the topographical substrates were observed at Days 7 or 21.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Topography-induced TNF-α secretion was statistically significant at 6 hours, especially on 1 μm gratings compared with planar and 500 nm samples.
“A more detailed analysis of using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test showed statistical significance in topography-induced TNF-α secretion (Figure 6 A) at 6 hr, particularly on 1 μm gratings compared to planar and 500 nm samples (*p<0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell adhesion density was comparable across all grating widths at each time point.
“However, cell adhesion density was comparable across all grating widths at each time point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
RAW 264.7 cells elongated on PDMS topographical gratings after 48 hours, unlike their round shape on planar PDMS controls.
“Cells elongated on the PDMS topographical gratings (Figure 3 A) compared to its native round shape on planar PDMS controls after 48h culture (Figure 3 B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The only pattern-transfer discrepancy was in the height of 250 nm substrates, which had an observed-to-expected ratio of 0.46.
“The only discrepancy in pattern transfer fidelity occurred with respect to the height of 250 nm substrates, which has an O/E value of 0.46.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
VEGF secretion responded significantly to topography at 6, 24, and 48 hours.
“VEGF cytokine secretion (Figure 6 D) responded significantly to topography at 6 hr (*p<0.05), 24 hr (*p<0.05), and 48 hr (*p<0.005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adherent cells on PDMS gratings elongated along the parallel grating axis compared with planar controls.
“Adherent cells on PDMS gratings elongated along the parallel axis of gratings compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells on the PCL gratings adopted a thin, spread, flattened shape.
“Cells became thinly spread and flattened on the PCL gratings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of adherent macrophage nuclei per area tended to fall between day 7 and day 21.
“The density of adherent macrophage nuclei generally decreased from Days 7 to 21 (Figure 7 G)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Secretion of TNF-α, MIP-1α, and MCP-1 generally rose from 6 to 24 hours and then fell slightly at 48 hours.
“The temporal secretion of TNF-α, MIP-1α and MCP-1 (pg/mL per 1000 cells) generally increased from 6 hr to 24 hr, then decreased slightly at 48 hr (Figure 6 A-C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Micro- and nanotopography significantly raised the average R-ratio of adherent macrophages on all surfaces compared with planar controls, especially on 500 nm gratings.
“Micro- and nanotopography significantly increased the average R-ratio of adherent macrophage on all surfaces compared to planar controls (*p<0.05), particularly on 500 nm gratings (**p<0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During early adhesion and morphology changes, RAW 264.7 cells secreted the pro-inflammatory/anti-wound-healing cytokines TNF-α, MIP-1α, and MCP-1.
“During the initial stages of cell adhesion and morphology change RAW 264.7 secreted pro-inflammatory/anti-wound healing cytokines TNF-α, MIP-1α and MCP-1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Contractile forces from adherent RAW 264.7 cells caused the polymer topography to detach over 24-48 hours.
“However, the contractile forces of adherent RAW 264.7 caused the polymer topography to delaminate over 24 hr to 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell elongation generally increased average cell area compared with the round shape on each topographical pattern.
“It was noted that cell elongation generally increased the average cell area compared to its native round shape on each topographical pattern (Supplementary Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TNF-α and VEGF secretion by RAW 264.7 cells were most sensitive to topographical effects, with reduced levels on larger grating sizes at 48 hours.
“TNF-α and VEGF secretion levels by RAW 264.7 cells showed greatest sensitivity to topographical effects, with reduced levels observed on larger grating sizes at 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The hybrid soft lithography and embossing technique successfully made PDMS replicas with 1 μm, 500 nm, and 300 nm gratings at a constant height of 350 nm.
“Similarly, the hybrid technique was successful in fabricating PDMS replicas with gratings of varying widths (1 μm, 500 nm and 300 nm) at constant height (350 nm) (Figure 2 EH).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The MIP-1α secretion profile matched early inflammation followed by a shift toward pro-wound healing activity.
“The MIP-1α secretion profile agreed with initial inflammation observed, followed by a transition towards pro-wound healing activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cytokine secretion profiles showed that macrophages respond to topographical cues during the early 6-48 hour inflammation stage.
“By measuring the functional response of macrophages in terms of its cytokine secretion profile, our results show that macrophages do respond to topographical cues in the early 6 - 48 hr inflammation stage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Topography influenced the in vivo macrophage functional response in adherent cell density, especially on 2 μm PCL gratings compared with planar controls.
“We observed that topography affected in vivo macrophage functional response in terms of adherent cell density particularly on 2 μm PCL gratings compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Native extracellular matrix architecture often displays pores, ridges, and fibrillar structures at micron and nanometer scales.
“In vivo extracellular matrix (ECM) architecture shown in scanning electron micrographs of basement membranes and collagen fibers often reveal a topography of pores, ridges and fibrillar structures at the micron and nanometer scales [30, 31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Prior work indicates that macrophage activation and foreign body giant cell formation are influenced by polymer fiber diameter, surface roughness, and geometry.
“Recent studies show that macrophage activation and FBGC formation respond to differing polymer fiber diameter [32, 33], surface roughness [34, 35] and geometry [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [32] Sanders, 2000, Tissue response to single-polymer fibers of varying diameters: evaluation of fibrous encapsulation and macrophage density, J Biomed Mater Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Cao H, McHugh K, Chew SY, Anderson JM. The topographical effect of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds on the in vivo and in vitro foreign body reaction. J Biomed Mater Res A Epub date: 2009/09/22; doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32609. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Fink, 2008, Stimulation of monocytes and macrophages: possible influence of surface roughness, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Spiller, 2009, In vitro evaluation of the PEtU-PDMS material immunocompatibility: the influence of surface topography and PDMS content, J Mater Sci Mater Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Schulte, 2009, Surface topography induces fibroblast adhesion on intrinsically nonadhesive poly(ethylene glycol) substrates, Biomacromolecules source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Topography is increasingly viewed as a significant cue that affects cellular responses.
“topography is increasingly recognized as an important cue that influences cellular response [26-29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [26] Yim, 2007, Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage, Exp Cell Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Dalby, 2007, Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation, Curr Stem Cell Res Ther source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Hansen, 2007, Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy, J Biomech source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Dalby, 2008, The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography, J Biomed Mater Res A source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Monocytes and macrophages are central mediators of the host tissue response to implants in the foreign body reaction.
“Monocyte and macrophage cells play a key role in mediating host tissue response to implants in the foreign body reaction [1-3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Williams, 2008, On the mechanisms of biocompatibility, Biomaterials source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Anderson, 2008, Foreign body reaction to biomaterials, Semin Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Ratner, 2004, Biomaterials: where we have been and where we are going, Annu Rev Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The 250 nm height discrepancy was due to the AFM tip being larger than the grating spacing, preventing measurement of the actual trough.
“This discrepancy was attributed to the sensitivity limit of the AFM readings because the AFM tip was larger than the spacing between the gratings (250 nm apart), and could not measure the actual trough of 250 nm samples, hence providing a lower height (h) value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Topography affects macrophage behavior in the foreign body response on all polymer surfaces examined.
“It was concluded that topography affects macrophage behavior in the foreign body response on all polymer surfaces examined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line is a valid model for macrophage behavior in the foreign body response.
- Rests on an assumption: The rat cage implant model reflects the foreign body response relevant to clinical implants.
- Rests on an assumption: Differences in surface chemistry among PCL, PLA, and PDMS do not confound the observed effects of topography.
- Interpretationown data
Topography affects cell adhesion in vivo, particularly on larger topography compared with planar controls.
“and cell adhesion in vivo particularly on larger size topography compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rat cage implant model reflects the foreign body response relevant to clinical implants.
- Interpretationown data
Topography-induced changes independent of surface chemistry did not show distinctive patterns.
“Topography-induced changes, independent of surface chemistry, did not reveal distinctive patterns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Differences in surface chemistry among PCL, PLA, and PDMS do not confound the observed effects of topography.
- Interpretationown data
The RAW 264.7 response to topography occurred independently of surface chemistry.
“Adhesion, elongation and alignment of RAW 264.7 to its underlying topography was clearly observed on PCL and PLA gratings (width:height:period = 1:1:2) and on PDMS substrates of constant height (width:period = 1:2, height = 350 nm), independent of surface chemistry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The elongated shapes and pseudopodia suggested that cells migrated across the surfaces.
“Cell elongation and pseudopodia presence indicated cellular migration across the surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The cytokine data suggest a shift from a pro-inflammatory profile at 6 and 24 hours toward a pro-wound-healing profile at 48 hours.
“Together, these results suggest a transition from a proinflammatory cytokine profile (TNF-α, MIP-1α, MCP-1) at 6 hr and 24 hr towards a pro-wound healing cytokine profile (VEGF) at 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Lower TNF-α and VEGF levels on 1 μm gratings than on planar and nanogratings suggest that inflammation-related processes may be reduced on 1 μm topography.
“Reduction of pro-inflammatory (TNF-α) and pro-wound healing (VEGF) cytokine levels on 1 μm gratings compared to planar and nanogratings suggest that inflammation-related processes may be reduced on 1 μm topography compared to nanogratings and planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The consistent cellular response to PCL, PLA, and PDMS in this study confirms that topography dictates changes in macrophage behavior independently of surface chemistry.
“The consistent cellular response to three different types of polymers (PCL, PLA and PDMS) in our studies confirm that topography dictates changes in macrophage behavior, independent of surface chemistry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The morphology changes seen across three polymers indicate that the findings are topography-mediated.
“The changes in cell morphology are observed in three different types of polymers, indicating that the findings in this study are topography-mediated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TNF-α secretion has been implicated in apoptosis of macrophages adherent to biomaterials.
“TNF-α secretion has been implicated in inducing apoptosis of adherent macrophage on biomaterials [53]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Brodbeck, 2002, Interleukin-4 inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced and spontaneous apoptosis of biomaterial-adherent macrophages, J Lab Clin Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Sanders et al. found thinner in vivo fibrous capsules around smaller microfibers (1-5 μm diameter) than around larger ones (6-10 μm diameter) for several polymers.
“Sanders et al. showed thinner in vivo fibrous capsule formation around smaller microfibers (1-5 μm diameter) compared to larger ones (6-10 μm diameter) for a variety of polymers [55]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Sanders, 2002, Tissue response to microfibers of different polymers: polyester, polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polyurethane, J Biomed Mater Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Topography-induced changes in macrophage behavior offer a way to influence phenotypic responses such as activation, motility, maturation, and fusion in the foreign body response without bioactive cues.
“Topography-induced change in macrophage behavior provides an opportunity to influence its phenotypic response such as cell activation, motility, maturation and fusion in the foreign body response without the addition of bioactive cues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Smaller topography (250-300 nm) and planar controls may share adhesion and motility kinetics that produce conventional macrophage adhesion, spreading, and fusion in the foreign body response.
“Smaller topography (250-300 nm) and planar controls may share the same adhesion and motility kinetics that result in the conventional macrophage adhesion, spreading and fusion observed during foreign body response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The weak correlation between topographical features and macrophage response may reflect the dynamic, heterogeneous, and complex nature of the macrophage system, which might mask the relationship because of limited time points and ensemble analysis.
“The weak correlation between topographical features and macrophage response may be a reflection of the intrinsically dynamic, heterogeneous, and complex nature of the macrophage cell system, which might mask the relationship due to our limited time point investigation and ensemble analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study suggests that topography may modulate macrophage phenotypes in the foreign body reaction.
“This study suggests that topography may modulate the phenotypes of macrophages in the context of foreign body reaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The observed heterogeneity of macrophage shapes (elongated and round) reflects the diverse plasticity of macrophage phenotypes.
“the heterogeneity of cell morphologies observed (elongated and round cells) reflect the diverse plasticity of macrophage cells that define its myriad of phenotypes [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Mosser, 2008, Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation, Nat Rev Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Macrophage desensitization to nanotopographical cues below 500 nm could aid motility and movement into different tissue types.
“Macrophage desensitization to nanotopographical cues below 500 nm could be an advantage in motility and movement into different tissue types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 36
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt day 21, 25-55% of fields showed high fusion (>90%), while only 28-37% showed low fusion (<10%).
“Approximately 25-55% of fields on surfaces registered high levels of fusion (>90%) while only 28-37% of fields supported low fusion (<10%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAverage R-ratios on planar PCL imprinted on glass and on Mylar differed significantly and were marginally higher than on planar TCPS and glass controls.
“The average R-ratios of cells on planar PCL (0 nm) imprinted on glass and on Mylar were significantly different (#p<0.01), and marginally higher than that on planar TCPS and glass controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross grating samples, adherent nuclei density was similar, except that 2 μm gratings had more cells than the planar control at day 21.
“with comparable nuclei density observed on all grating samples, except for increased cell density on 2 μm gratings compared to planar control at Day 21 (*p<0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLow fusion fell as grating size increased at day 7, but this pattern reversed at day 21.
“Topography-induced cellular fusion showed that low fusion decreased with increasing grating sizes at Day 7, but the trend reversed at Day 21 (Figure 7 H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe topographical effect on MIP-1α was hard to discern, but significance occurred at 6 hours for 300 nm versus planar, at 24 hours for 1 μm versus 300 nm and 500 nm, and at 48 hours for 300 nm, 500 nm, and 1 μm versus planar.
“The topographical effect on MIP-1α secretion was difficult to discern (Figure 6 B) but significance was observed at 6 hr for 300 nm samples compared to planar control (*p<0.05), at 24 hr for 1 μm gratings compared to 300 nm and 500 nm samples (*p<0.01), and at 48 hr for 300 nm, 500 nm and 1 μm gratings compared to planar samples (*p<0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPatterns in topography-induced cytokine secretion were difficult to discern, but greater statistical significance appeared at 24 and 48 hours.
“Patterns in topography-induced cytokine secretion were difficult to discern but greater statistical significance was observed for 24 hr and 48 hr readings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost adherent cells and FBGCs on PCL/Mylar were thinly spread, but some were elongated and extended pseudopodia along the gratings.
“While most adherent cells and FBGCs displayed a thinly spread morphology on the PCL/Mylar surfaces, some cells displayed elongated morphologies and the extension of pseudopodia in the direction of gratings, confirmed by SEM imaging (Supplementary Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12 were not detected in the supernatant, with a detection limit of 3.2 pg/mL.
“The pro-inflammatory and pro-wound healing cytokine IL-1β, and the anti-inflammatory and pro-wound healing cytokines IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12 were not detected in the supernatant (detection limit: 3.2 pg/mL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt day 7, fusion was low on all surfaces: 58-74% of fields had low or no fusion, and 0-5% had high fusion.
“At Day 7, fusion was minimal on all surfaces with 58-74% of fields having low (<10%) or no fusion (0%), and only 0-5% of fields with high fusion (>90%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVEGF was low from 6 to 24 hours, below 0.5 pg/mL per 1000 cells, but increased at 48 hours.
“In contrast, VEGF was low at 6 hr to 24 hr (<0.5 pg/mL per 1000 cells, Figure 6 D), but increased at 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPattern transfer fidelity was within 8% of the intended feature size, with an observed-to-expected ratio of 1.08.
“A comparison of the observed values (O) to the expected value (E) of the topographical gratings showed fidelity to be within 8% of expected feature size (O/E value of 1.08).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTopography had no statistically significant effect on the fractional distribution of elongated cells or the average R-ratio.
“The effect of topography on fractional distribution of elongated cells and average R-ratio was not statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost adherent cells remained round, while elongated cells were less than 15% of total cells.
“Similar to macrophage adhesion and elongation on PCL gratings, the majority of adherent cells retained their native round shape (Figure 5 G) while elongated cells formed a small fraction, less than 15%, of total cells (Figure 5 F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 24 hours, increasing grating width increased TNF-α secretion, but the trend reversed at 48 hours, with significance for 1 μm versus 300 nm gratings.
“At 24 hr, increasing grating width increased TNF-α secretion (*p<0.001), but the trend was reversed at 48 hr (*p<0.05), with statistical significance noted for 1 μm gratings compared to 300 nm gratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigh fusion was rare at day 7 and tended to decrease with larger grating sizes.
“In contrast, high fusion was not prevalent at Day 7 but showed a decreasing trend with larger grating sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell spreading was comparable across grating sizes at 6 and 24 hours but increased significantly on 500 nm and 1 μm gratings compared with planar PDMS controls.
“Cell spreading of adherent macrophage was comparable across all grating sizes at 6 hr and 24 hr, but increased significantly on 500 nm and 1 μm gratings compared to planar PDMS control (Figure 5 F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTNF-α, MIP-1α, MCP-1, and VEGF were detected in the supernatant.
“TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), MIP-1α (macrophage inflammatory protein-1α), MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) cytokines were detected in the supernatant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRAW 264.7 cells clearly adhered, elongated, and aligned to the underlying topography on PCL and PLA gratings and on PDMS substrates of constant height.
“Adhesion, elongation and alignment of RAW 264.7 to its underlying topography was clearly observed on PCL and PLA gratings (width:height:period = 1:1:2) and on PDMS substrates of constant height (width:period = 1:2, height = 350 nm), independent of surface chemistry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn vivo studies at 21 days showed lower macrophage adhesion density and less high cell fusion on 2 μm gratings than on planar controls.
“In vivo studies at 21 days showed reduced macrophage adhesion density and degree of high cell fusion on 2 μm gratings compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rat cage implant model reflects the foreign body response relevant to clinical implants.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe fraction of elongated cells rose from 0.10 on planar controls to 0.17 on 250 nm, 0.23 on 500 nm, and 0.20 on 2 μm gratings.
“The fraction of elongated cells increased from 0.10 on planar controls to 0.17 (66% increase), 0.23 (123% increase) and 0.20 (85% increase) on 250 nm, 500 nm and 2 μm gratings, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe average R-ratio was 1.78 on planar controls, 2.18 on 250 nm gratings, 2.53 on 500 nm gratings, and 2.24 on 2 μm gratings.
“The average R-ratio of macrophages on planar control was 1.78, but increased to 2.18 on 250 nm gratings and 2.53 on 500 nm gratings, and then decreased slightly to 2.24 on 2 μm gratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBetween 24 and 48 hours, TNF-α, MIP-1α, and MCP-1 levels were maintained or reduced, while VEGF increased.
“Between 24 hr to 48 hr, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, MIP-1α and MCP-1 were maintained or reduced, while VEGF, a pro-inflammation/pro-wound healing cytokine, increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe elongated-cell fraction was statistically significant on 250 nm and 2 μm PCL gratings versus planar control and on 500 nm gratings.
“While the fraction of elongated cells on each topography was small (less than 25% of total cell population), statistical significance was observed on 250 nm and 2 μm PCL gratings compared to planar control (*p<0.05), and on 500 nm gratings (**p<0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell adhesion density at 6 hours was low, around 1 × 100 cells/mm2, and did not exceed the seeding density of 2 × 100 cells/mm2 until between 24 and 48 hours, when proliferation occurred.
“Morphometric analysis of RAW 264.7 response to topography showed that cell adhesion density on 6 hr samples was low (around 1 × 100 cells/mm2) and did not increase above the cell seeding density (at 2 × 100 cells/mm2) until between 24 hr and 48 hr (Figure 5 E), when proliferation occurred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTopography-induced MCP-1 secretion was most significant at 24 hours, with increasing MCP-1 levels on increasing grating sizes from planar and 300 nm and 500 nm compared with 1 μm, but was hard to discern at 48 hours.
“Topography-induced MCP-1 secretion was most significant at 24 hr (*p<0.001) with increasing MCP-1 levels on increasing grating sizes: planar (*p<0.01), 300 nm (*p<0.05) and 500 nm (*p<0.05) compared to 1 μm gratings, but was difficult to discern at 48 hr.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn this system, macrophage elongation increased as topography size decreased, but only down to 500 nm, after which the trend diverged.
“Macrophage cells studies in our system showed that elongation increased with decreasing topography, but only to a limit of 500 nm before the trend diverged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 21 days, high cellular fusion (>90%) decreased as grating size increased, with high fusion on planar > 500 nm > 2 μm.
“In the long term response (21 days), high cellular fusion (>90%) was reduced as grating sizes increased: represented as high fusion on planar > 500 nm > 2 μm (Figure 7 G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEach grating size was tested in triplicate at each time point.
“Triplicates (n=3) of each grating size were used for each time point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTopography affects cell morphology and cytokine secretion in vitro.
“but do affect cell morphology and cytokine secretion in vitro”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line is a valid model for macrophage behavior in the foreign body response.
- Rests on an assumption: Differences in surface chemistry among PCL, PLA, and PDMS do not confound the observed effects of topography.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe Bio-Plex reader was calibrated and validated before every reading according to the manufacturer's instructions.
“The Bio-Plex reader was calibrated and validated prior to every reading, strictly following the manufacturer's instructions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Case Western Reserve University.
“All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Case Western Reserve University.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMacrophages in this system showed no distinctive morphology or orientation trends with topography, unlike mesenchymal stem cells and smooth muscle cells, which had over 80% elongation and alignment.
“The lack of distinctive trends in cell morphology and orientation changes of both RAW 264.7 and in vivo macrophage cells to the topography differed from our previous studies involving other cell types, such as mesenchymal stem cells [26] and smooth muscle cells [45], that showed over 80% cell elongation and alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Yim, 2007, Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage, Exp Cell Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Yim, 2005, Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells, Biomaterials source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMorphology measurements used at least 150 cells in each triplicate sample per grating size.
“Morphology measurements were made from at least 150 cells in each triplicate sample (n=3) per grating size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe cage implant model is an established system for studying host tissue-implant responses.
“using the cage implant model, an established system for studying host tissue-implant response [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Miller, 1989, Generation of IL-1-like activity in response to biomedical polymer implants: a comparison of in vitro and in vivo models, J Biomed Mater Res source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSEM imaging confirmed the elongated morphologies and pseudopodia.
“confirmed by SEM imaging (Supplementary Figure 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLarger topography (500 nm-2 μm) limits macrophage activation and inflammation-related processes, but topography-induced sensitivity reaches a limit around 500 nm.
“Our results suggest that larger size topography (500 nm-2 μm) limits macrophage activation and inflammation-related processes but topography-induced sensitivity reaches a limit around 500 nm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMCP-1 stimulates murine FBGC fusion in vivo.
“MCP-1 (macrophage chemoattractant protein-1), a chemokine that recruits macrophage and promotes migration, also stimulates murine FBGC fusion in vivo [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Kyriakides, 2004, The CC chemokine ligand, CCL2/MCP1, participates in macrophage fusion and foreign body giant cell formation, Am J Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough micro- to submicron gratings did not produce a distinctive pattern, topography affects cell morphology, in vitro cytokine secretion, and in vivo cell adhesion, especially for larger patterns compared with planar controls.
“Although the response to topography in the form of gratings from micro- to submicron scale has not revealed a distinctive pattern, topography indeed affects cell morphology, cytokine secretion in vitro, and cell adhesion in vivo particularly for larger size patterns compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMIP-1α participates in chemotaxis and recruitment of monocytes and leukocytes during inflammation.
“while MIP-1α is involved in chemotaxis and recruitment of monocytes and leukocytes during the inflammatory response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe macrophage size sensitivity resembles phagocytosis, in which micron-scale particles are internalized more than nanoscale particles, with peak phagocytosis near 2 μm diameter.
“The phenomenon appears to mirror that of phagocytosis, where macrophages preferentially internalize particulates in the micron range over the nanometric range, with peak phagocytosis observed with particles of approximately 2 μm in diameter [46-48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [46] Ahsan, 2002, Targeting to macrophages: role of physicochemical properties of particulate carriers–liposomes and microspheres – on the phagocytosis by macrophages, J Control Release source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Schafer, 1992, Phagocytosis of nanoparticles by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected macrophages: a possibility for antiviral drug targeting, Pharm Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Tabata, 1988, Effect of the size and surface charge of polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage, Biomaterials source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLarger topographical cues (2 μm gratings) may physically interrupt or constrain fibrous scar tissue formation, reducing cell adhesion density and limiting FBGC fusion compared with planar controls.
“The larger topographical cues (2 μm gratings) could be presenting a physical interruption or constraint to the fibrous scar tissue formation process, reducing cell adhesion density and limiting FBGC fusion on larger gratings compared to planar controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe limit of macrophage sensitivity to nanotopographical cues could be compared to surface-area dependence of nanoparticle pro-inflammatory responses and to particle shape and size effects on internalization kinetics.
“While the infinitely long parallel gratings, compared to a cell dimension, provide a non-phagocytosable surface, the limit of macrophage sensitivity to nanotopographical cues could be compared to a surface area dependence on pro-inflammation response, analogous to surface area dependence of nanoparticles in determining inflammatory response [50, 51], and the influence of particle shape and size on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [50] Limbach, 2005, Oxide nanoparticle uptake in human lung fibroblasts: effects of particle size, agglomeration, and diffusion at low concentrations, Environ Sci Technol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Hussain, 2009, Oxidative stress and proinflammatory effects of carbon black and titanium dioxide nanoparticles: role of particle surface area and internalized amount, Toxicology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] Gratton, 2008, The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMacrophages seemed relatively insensitive to nanotopography below 500 nm and preferred to respond to 500 nm, 1 μm, and 2 μm gratings.
“Macrophage cells appeared to be relatively insensitive to nanotopography (less than 500 nm), preferring to respond to 500 nm, 1 μm and 2 μm gratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVEGF promotes blood vessel dilation and angiogenesis during inflammation to aid wound healing in damaged tissue.
“VEGF promotes blood vessel dilation and angiogenesis in the event of inflammation to promote wound healing in damaged tissue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCellular responses to topography affect cell function, including adhesion strength, spreading, intracellular signaling, and differentiation potential.
“Cellular responses to topography are known to affect cell function in terms of adhesion strength, spreading, intracellular signaling and differentiation potential [59-61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [59] Kulangara, 2009, Substrate topography shapes cell function, Soft Matter source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Vogel, 2006, Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Yim, 2005, Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response, Nanomedicine source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line is a valid model for macrophage behavior in the foreign body response.
“Adherent murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7 (ATCC, Manassas, VA), was grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) cell culture media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 μg/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rat cage implant model reflects the foreign body response relevant to clinical implants.
“Samples of PCL gratings nanoimprinted on Mylar were evaluated in rats using the cage implant model to determine the effect of topography on foreign body reaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Differences in surface chemistry among PCL, PLA, and PDMS do not confound the observed effects of topography.
“RAW 264.7 was cultured on 3 different types of polymers, PCL, PLA and PDMS gratings, to examine macrophage response to topography independent of surface chemistry.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Upregulation of TNF-α and VEGF provided a mixture of M1 and M2 phenotype in smaller gratings (higher surface roughness).
“Upregulation of TNF‐α and VEGF provided a mixture of M1 and M2 phenotype in smaller gratings (higher surface roughness).”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [147]
The Results (§3.4; page unavailable) report higher TNF-α and VEGF secretion on smaller gratings than on 1 μm gratings at 48 hours, and the Discussion (§4; page unavailable) identifies them as pro-inflammatory and pro-wound-healing cytokines, respectively. The paper does not establish a mixed M1/M2 phenotype or identify smaller gratings as having higher surface roughness; its cytokine findings also vary by time point. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredChen et al. confirmed topography-induced polarization on PCL, PLA, and poly(dimethyl siloxane) imprinted with 250-2000 nm grooves.
“Chen et al. confirmed this topography‐induced polarization on PCL, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and poly(dimethyl siloxane) imprinted with 250–2000 nm grooves.[ 147 ]”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [147]
The Introduction and Results §3.2 report PCL, PLA, and PDMS gratings and macrophage elongation in response to their topography. They do not establish macrophage polarization as a functional phenotype: the reported response is primarily morphological. Methods §2.1 also specifies 300–1000 nm widths for PDMS, rather than the full 250–2000 nm range implied for all three materials. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSeeded RAW 264.7 established its longest elongation in 500 nm grooves.
“Seeded RAW 264.7 established its longest elongation in 500 nm grooves.”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [147]
Irregular topographies with dimensions similar to aligned patterns produce circularly spreading macrophages with M1 characteristics.
“irregular topographies with similar dimensions produce circularly spreading macrophages with M1 characteristics”
From Modeling mechanical activation of macrophages during pulmonary fibrogenesis for targeted anti-fibrosis therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Aligned patterns with micron-level feature sizes promote M2 macrophage differentiation through forced alignment.
“Aligned patterns with feature sizes in the micron level were shown to promote M2 macrophage differentiation through forced alignment”
From Modeling mechanical activation of macrophages during pulmonary fibrogenesis for targeted anti-fibrosis therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The severity of the foreign body reaction depends on numerous factors, including material chemistry and topography.
“its severity depends on numerous factors, such as material chemistry18 and topography.19”
From Student award winner in the undergraduate category for the society of biomaterials 9th World Biomaterials Congress, Chengdu, China, June 1–5, 2012: The effects of substrate stiffness on the <i>in vitro</i> activation of macrophages and <i>in vivo</i> host response to poly(ethylene glycol)‐based hydrogels (2012) · cites this paper as [19]
BMDMs oriented along the grooved titanium surfaces, mostly parallel to the groove direction.
“bone marrow derived macrophages aligned along the grooved surface topographies, generally in the direction parallel to the grooves”
From Micro- and Nanopatterned Topographical Cues for Regulating Macrophage Cell Shape and Phenotype (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Gratings made by lithography and various post shapes can alter macrophage secretion of TNF-α and VEGF.
“Lithographically generated gratings as well as different post geometries have also been shown to modulate macrophage TNF-α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion.12,13”
From Micro- and Nanopatterned Topographical Cues for Regulating Macrophage Cell Shape and Phenotype (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Upon in vivo implantation, materials with 2 mm gratings exhibit the least number of FBGC.
“Interestingly, upon in vivo implantation, materials with 2 mm gratings exhibited the least number of FBGC (1 mm grating materials were not analyzed).”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Gratings 1 mm wide elicit the lowest inflammatory response in vitro (reduced TNF-a and VEGF secretion) compared to nano gratings and planar controls.
“This study by Chen et al. [46] also showed that gratings that were 1 mm wide elicited the lowest inflammatory response in vitro (reduced levels of TNF-a and VEGF secretion) compared to nano gratings and planar controls.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Topographical cues can override the effects of surface chemistry in certain materials, especially in the first 6-48 hours after initial contact.
“It was recently found that topographical cues could override the effects of surface chemistry in certain materials, especially in the first 6-48 hours after initial contact.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
RAW 264.7 cells seeded on substrates with different surface chemistries but different width parallel gratings (250 nm to 2 mm) show increased elongation with decreasing topography irrespective of surface chemistry, but are largely insensitive to topography changes smaller than 500 nm.
“RAW 264.7 cells seeded on substrates with three distinctive surface chemistries ((Poly (s-caprolactone) (PCL)), (Poly (Lactic acid)(PLA)), (Poly (Dimethyl Siloxane) (PDMS))) but different width parallel gratings (Fig. 4f,g) (with a range of 250 nm to 2 mm) showed increased elongation with decreasing topography irrespective of the underlying surface chemistry; however, cells were largely”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Studies suggest around 1 mm thick strips or fibers are optimum for micropatterning the surface to control attachment.
“studies suggest around 1 mm thick strips or fibers are optimum [46]”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Day-21 adhesion trend is reversed in the abstract
MajorThe abstract says macrophage adhesion density was lower on 2 μm gratings than on planar controls at 21 days. The results report a statistically significant increase on those gratings at Day 21, reversing the stated conclusion.
“In vivo studies at 21 days showed reduced macrophage adhesion density and degree of high cell fusion on 2 μm gratings compared to planar controls.”
“except for increased cell density on 2 μm gratings compared to planar control at Day 21 (*p<0.05).”
Cites
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M., & Edwards, J. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2448 · Cited by 9,144 · see citing works
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways
Gratton, S. E. A., Ropp, P. A., Pohlhaus, P. D., Luft, J. C., Madden, V. J., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801763105 · Cited by 2,918 · see citing works
On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Williams, D. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 · Cited by 2,772 · see citing works
The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., Tare, R. S., Andar, A. U., Riehle, M. O., Herzyk, P., Wilkinson, C. D. W., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2013 · Cited by 2,420 · see citing works
Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions
Vogel, V., & Sheetz, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1890 · Cited by 2,328 · see citing works
Biomaterials: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going
Ratner, B. D., & Bryant, S. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140027 · Cited by 1,507 · see citing works
Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension
Oh, S., Brammer, K. S., Li, Y. S. J., Teng, D., Engler, A. J., Chien, S., & Jin, S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813200106 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Role of Particle Size in Phagocytosis of Polymeric Microspheres
Champion, J. A., Walker, A. H., & Mitragotri, S. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9562-y · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Recent progress in nanoimprint technology and its applications
Guo, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/37/11/r01 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Yim, E. K. F., Pang, S. W., & Leong, K. W. (2007) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.031 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Self-citationSanterre, J. P., Woodhouse, K., Laroche, G., & Labow, R. S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Yim, E. K. F., Darling, E. M., Kulangara, K., Guilak, F., & Leong, K. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.037 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Self-citationNanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells
Yim, E. K. F., Reano, R. M., Pang, S. W., Yee, A. F., Chen, C. S., & Leong, K. W. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.058 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Self-citationAhsan, F. (2002) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00549-1 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Effect of the size and surface charge of polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage
Tabata, Y., & Ikada, Y. (1988) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(88)90033-6 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography
Dalby, M. J., Riehle, M. O., Johnstone, H., Affrossman, S., & Curtis, A. S. G. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00424-0 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Kim, D., Han, K., Gupta, K., Kwon, K. W., Suh, K. Y., & Levchenko, A. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.042 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Hussain, S., Boland, S., Baeza-Squiban, A., Hamel, R., Thomassen, L. C. J., Martens, J. A., Billon-Galland, M. A., Fleury-Feith, J., Moisan, F., Pairon, J.-C., et al. (2009) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.001 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production
Andersson, A., Bäckhed, F., von Euler, A., Richter‐Dahlfors, A., Sutherland, D. S., & Kasemo, B. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00208-4 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Karuri, N. W., Liliensiek, S. J., Teixeira, A. I., Abrams, G. A., Campbell, S. F., Nealey, P. F., & Murphy, C. J. (2004) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.01146 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Refai, A. K., Textor, M., Brunette, D. M., & Waterfield, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30075 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response
Yim, E. K. F., & Leong, K. W. (2005) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2004.11.008 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro
Brodbeck, W. G., Nakayama, Y., Matsuda, T., Colton, E., Ziats, N. P., & Anderson, J. M. (2002) · Cytokine · doi:10.1006/cyto.2002.1048 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationTeixeira, A. I., McKie, G. A., Foley, J. D., Bertics, P. J., Nealey, P. F., & Murphy, C. J. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.044 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Brodbeck, W. G., Patel, J., Voskerician, G., Christenson, E., Shive, M. S., Nakayama, Y., Matsuda, T., Ziats, N. P., & Anderson, J. M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162124199 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Self-citationCao, H., Mchugh, K., Chew, S. Y., & Anderson, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32609 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Self-citationInterleukin-13 induces human monocyte/macrophage fusion and macrophage mannose receptor expression
DeFife, K. M., Jenney, C. R., McNally, A. K., Colton, E., & Anderson, J. M. (1997) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.158.7.3385 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationKyriakides, T. R., Foster, M. J., Keeney, G. E., Tsai, A., Giachelli, C. M., Clark-Lewis, I., Rollins, B. J., & Bornstein, P. (2004) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63265-8 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
McNally, A. K., & Anderson, J. M. (2002) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64882-1 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationNitric Oxide-Releasing Polymers Containing the [N(O)NO]<sup>-</sup>Group
Smith, D. J., Chakravarthy, D., Pulfer, S., Simmons, M. L., Hrabie, J. A., Citro, M. L., Saavedra, J. E., Davies, K. M., Hutsell, T. C., Mooradian, D. L., et al. (1996) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm950652b · Cited by 208 · see citing works
<i>In vivo</i> leukocyte cytokine mRNA responses to biomaterials are dependent on surface chemistry
Brodbeck, W. G., Voskerician, G., Ziats, N. P., Nakayama, Y., Matsuda, T., & Anderson, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10425 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>In vivo</i> biocompatibility studies. I. The cage implant system and a biodegradable hydrogel
Marchant, R., Hiltner, A., Hamlin, C., Rabinovitch, A., Slobodkin, R., & Anderson, J. M. (1983) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820170209 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationIngram, J. H., Stone, M. H., Fisher, J., & Ingham, E. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.054 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Schutte, R. J., Parisi‐Amon, A., & Reichert, W. M. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31863 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Use of nanotopography to study mechanotransduction in fibroblasts – methods and perspectives
Dalby, M. J., Riehle, M. O., Sutherland, D. S., Agheli, H., & Curtis, A. S. G. (2004) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1078/0171-9335-00369 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Interleukin-4-induced macrophage fusion is prevented by inhibitors of mannose receptor activity.
(1996) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationReversal imprinting by transferring polymer from mold to substrate
Huang, X. D., Bao, L.-R., Cheng, X., Guo, L. J., Pang, S. W., & Yee, A. F. (2002) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.1523404 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Schäfer, V., von Briesen, H., Andreesen, R., Steffan, A.-M., Royer, C., Tröster, S., Kreuter, J., & Rübsamen-Waigmann, H. (1992) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1015852732512 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Substrate topography shapes cell function
Kulangara, K., & Leong, K. W. (2009) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b910132m · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationSensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties
Féréol, S., Fodil, R., Labat, B., Galiacy, S., Laurent, V. M., Louis, B., Isabey, D., & Planus, E. (2006) · Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.20130 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
McNally, A. K., Jones, J. A., MacEwan, S. R., Colton, E., & Anderson, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31658 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationNanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation
Dalby, M., Gadegaard, N., G. Curtis, A., & C. Oreffo, R. (2007) · Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.2174/157488807780599220 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Nanotechnology and Biomaterials for Orthopedic Medical Applications
Balasundaram, G., & Webster, T. J. (2006) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.1.2.169 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the foreign body reaction on biomaterials
Jones, J. A., McNally, A. K., Chang, D. T., Qin, L. A., Meyerson, H., Colton, E., Kwon, I. L. K., Matsuda, T., & Anderson, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31220 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationBatchelor, M. M., Reoma, S. L., Fleser, P. S., Nuthakki, V. K., Callahan, R. E., Shanley, C. J., Politis, J. K., Elmore, J., Merz, S. I., & Meyerhoff, M. E. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030286t · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Schulte, V. A., Díez, M., Möller, M., & Lensen, M. C. (2009) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm900631s · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Adhesions that mediate invasion
Gimona, M., & Buccione, R. (2006) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2006.05.003 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., & Wilkinson, C. D. W. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31409 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Modulus-dependent macrophage adhesion and behavior
Irwin, E. F., Saha, K., Rosenbluth, M., Gamble, L. J., Castner, D. G., & Healy, K. E. (2008) · Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition · doi:10.1163/156856208786052407 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Miller, K. M., Rose‐Caprara, V., & Anderson, J. M. (1989) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820230904 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationSanders, J. E., Bale, S. D., & Neumann, T. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.10285 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Hansen, J. C., Yul Lim, J., Xu, L.-C., Siedlecki, C. A., Mauger, D. T., & Donahue, H. J. (2007) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Kao, W. J., Hubbell, J. A., & Anderson, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1008971222932 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationElectron microscopy of the canine corneal basement membranes
Abrams, G. A., Bentley, E., Nealey, P. F., & Murphy, C. J. (2002) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000047929 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
McNally, A. K., & Anderson, J. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63474-8 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hung, H., Wu, C., Chien, S., & Hsu, S. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.003 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ultrastructural basement membrane topography of the bladder epithelium
Murphy, C. J., Wang, Z.-Y., Nealey, P. F., Bjorling, D. E., & Abrams, G. A. (2003) · Urological Research · doi:10.1007/s00240-003-0347-9 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Tang, Y. W., Labow, R. S., Revenko, I., & Santerre, J. P. (2002) · Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · doi:10.1163/156856202320253965 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Vignery, A. (2008) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-250-2_9 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Brodbeck, W. G., Shive, M. S., Colton, E., Ziats, N. P., & Anderson, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1067/mlc.2002.121260 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationVoskerician, G., Gingras, P. H., & Anderson, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30481 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationStimulation of monocytes and macrophages: possible influence of surface roughness
Fink, J., Fuhrmann, R., Scharnweber, T., & Franke, R. P. (2008) · Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · doi:10.3233/ch-2008-1090 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Duo-mold imprinting of three-dimensional polymeric structures
Kong, Y. P., Low, H. Y., Pang, S. W., & Yee, A. F. (2004) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.1813459 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, J. A., Qin, L. A., Meyerson, H. J., Kwon, I. K., Matsuda, T., & Anderson, J. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31660 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationHighly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.
Atienza, C. A., & Maloney, W. J. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ward, B., Anderson, J. M., McVenes, R., & Stokes, K. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30802 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationSpiller, D., Mirtelli, C., Losi, P., Briganti, E., Sbrana, S., Counoupas, C., Kull, S., Tonlorenzi, S., & Soldani, G. (2009) · Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3823-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The role of nitric oxide in biocompatibility.
Williams, D. A. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sacrificial film-assisted nanoimprint lithography
Xu, Y., Zhao, W., & Low, H. Y. (2006) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2005.12.004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape
McWhorter, F. Y., Wang, T., Nguyen, P., Chung, T., & Liu, W. F. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308887110 · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
Franz, S., Rammelt, S., Scharnweber, D., & Simon, J. C. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
PDMS with designer functionalities—Properties, modifications strategies, and applications
Wolf, M., Salieb–Beugelaar, G. B., & Hunziker, P. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.001 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Properties and Applications of PDMS for Biomedical Engineering: A Review
Miranda, I., Souza, A., Sousa, P. J., Ribeiro, J., Castanheira, E. M. S., Lima, R. A., & Minas, G. M. H. (2021) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb13010002 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles
Sridharan, R., Cameron, A. R., Kelly, D. J., Kearney, C. J., & O’Brien, F. J. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Design of biodegradable, implantable devices towards clinical translation
Li, C., Guo, C., Fitzpatrick, V., Ibrahim, A. G. A., Zwierstra, M. J., Hanna, P. C., Lechtig, A., Nazarian, A., Lin, S. J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0150-z · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?
Mariani, E., Lisignoli, G., Borzì, R. M., & Pulsatelli, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20030636 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Immune Regulation of Skin Wound Healing: Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets
Larouche, J. A., Sheoran, S., Maruyama, K., & Martino, M. M. (2018) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2017.0761 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Engineering Immunomodulatory Biomaterials To Tune the Inflammatory Response
Vishwakarma, A., Bhise, N. S., Evangelista, M. B., Rouwkema, J., Dokmeci, M. R., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Vrana, N. E., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Blakney, A. K., Swartzlander, M. D., & Bryant, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34104 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Engineering the next generation of cell-based therapeutics
Bashor, C. J., Hilton, I. B., Bandukwala, H. S., Smith, D. M., & Omid Veiseh, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00476-6 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function
McWhorter, F. Y., Davis, C. T., & Liu, W. F. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1796-8 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Liang, H., Liu, X., Wu, J., Cao, Y., Wong, T. M., Kwan, K. Y.-H., Cheung, K., Wu, S., & Yeung, K. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf6654 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Tailoring Materials for Modulation of Macrophage Fate
Li, J., Jiang, X., Li, H., Gelinsky, M., & Gu, Z. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202004172 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: Implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design
Ogle, M. E., Segar, C. E., Sridhar, S., & Botchwey, E. A. (2016) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370216650293 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Micro- and Nanopatterned Topographical Cues for Regulating Macrophage Cell Shape and Phenotype
Luu, T. U., Gott, S. C., Woo, B. W. K., Rao, M. P., & Liu, W. F. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b10589 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
OsteoMacs: Key players around bone biomaterials
Miron, R. J., & Bosshardt, D. D. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.017 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Ma, Q.-L., Zhao, L.-Z., Liu, R.-R., Jin, B.-Q., Song, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y.-S., Chen, L.-H., & Zhang, Y.-M. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.025 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Zhang, D., Chen, Q., Shi, C., Chen, M., Ma, K., Wan, J., & Liu, R. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202007226 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Liu, W. X., Li, J., Cheng, M., Wang, Q., Yeung, K., Chu, P. K.-H., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201800749 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Peng, R., Yao, X., & Ding, J. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.035 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Almeida, C. R., Serra, T., Oliveira, M. I., Planell, J. A., Barbosa, M. A., & Navarro, M. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.035 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Saino, E., Focarete, M. L., Gualandi, C., Emanuele, E., Cornaglia, A. I., Imbriani, M., & Visai, L. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm200248h · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Brown, B., & Badylak, S. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.025 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Tissue Engineering Tools For Modulation of the Immune Response
Boehler, R. M., Graham, J. G., & Shea, L. D. (2011) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113754 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Delgado, L. M., Bayon, Y., Pandit, A., & Zeugolis, D. I. (2015) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0290 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Combating Implant Infections: Shifting Focus from Bacteria to Host
Yavari, S. A., Castenmiller, S. M., van Strijp, J. A. G., & Croes, M. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002962 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Macroscale biomaterials strategies for local immunomodulation
Dellacherie, M. O., Seo, B. R., & Mooney, D. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0106-3 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Butler, J. A., Handy, R. D., Upton, M., & Besinis, A. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c12488 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Seyednejad, H., Gawlitta, D., Kuiper, R., de Bruin, A., van Nostrum, C. F., Vermonden, T., Dhert, W. J. A., & Hennink, W. E. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.002 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Jain, N., Moeller, J., & Vogel, V. (2019) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121224 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Examination of the foreign body response to biomaterials by nonlinear intravital microscopy
Dondossola, E., Holzapfel, B. M., Alexander, S., Filippini, S., Hutmacher, D. W., & Friedl, P. (2016) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-016-0007 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Chronic inflammation in biomaterial-induced periprosthetic osteolysis: NF-κB as a therapeutic target
Lin, T., Tamaki, Y., Pajarinen, J., Waters, H., Woo, D. K., Yao, Z., & Goodman, S. B. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.034 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Macrophage responses to implants: prospects for personalized medicine
Kzhyshkowska, J. G., Gudima, A., Riabov, V., Dollinger, C., Lavall�e, P., & Vrana, N. E. (2015) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.5vmr0415-166r · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Bone Repair Biomaterials: A Perspective from Immunomodulation
Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Hu, Y., Jing, Y., Geng, Z., & Su, J. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202208639 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Huang, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, X., Chang, J., & Dai, K. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.044 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Lee, S. W., Phillips, K., Gu, H., Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M., & Ren, D. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120595 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Advanced strategies to thwart foreign body response to implantable devices
Capuani, S., Malgir, G., Chua, C. Y. X., & Grattoni, A. (2022) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10300 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Abdelaziz, A. G., Nageh, H., Abdo, S. M., Abdalla, M. S., Amer, A. A., Abdal‐hay, A., & Barhoum, A. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020204 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Implant Fibrosis and the Underappreciated Role of Myofibroblasts in the Foreign Body Reaction
Noskovicova, N., Hinz, B., & Pakshir, P. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10071794 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Batool, F., Özçelik, H., Stutz, C., Gegout, P., Benkirane-Jessel, N., Petit, C., & Huck, O. (2021) · Journal of Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1177/20417314211041428 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Li, J., Wen, J., Li, B., Wan, L., Qiao, W., Shen, J., Jin, W., Jiang, X., Yeung, K., & Chu, P. K.-H. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201700678 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Biomaterials‐Based Electronics: Polymers and Interfaces for Biology and Medicine
Muskovich, M. L., & Bettinger, C. J. (2012) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201200071 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response
Anselme, K., & Bigerelle, M. (2011) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1179/1743280411y.0000000001 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Strategic Design and Fabrication of Nerve Guidance Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Sarker, M. D., Naghieh, S., McInnes, A. D., Schreyer, D. J., & Chen, D. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700635 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The host response to naturally-derived extracellular matrix biomaterials
Morris, A. H., Stamer, D. K., & Kyriakides, T. R. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.01.002 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Emerging links between surface nanotechnology and endocytosis: Impact on nonviral gene delivery
Adler, A. F., & Leong, K. W. (2010) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2010.10.007 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationTylek, T., Blum, C., Hrynevich, A., Schlegelmilch, K., Schilling, T., Dalton, P. D., & Groll, J. (2020) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Liu, W. X., Li, J., Cheng, M., Wang, Q., Qian, Y., Yeung, K., Chu, P. K.-H., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.04.008 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Host Responses to Biomaterials and Anti‐Inflammatory Design—a Brief Review
Zhou, G., & Groth, T. (2018) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201800112 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Vassey, M., Figueredo, G. P., Scurr, D. J., Vasilevich, A. S., Vermeulen, S., Carlier, A., Luckett, J., Beijer, N. R. M., Williams, P. M., Winkler, D. A., et al. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903392 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Designing implant surface topography for improved biocompatibility
Harvey, A. G., Hill, E. W., & Bayat, A. (2013) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/erd.12.82 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Titanium surface hydrophilicity modulates the human macrophage inflammatory cytokine response
Alfarsi, M. A., Hamlet, S. M., & Ivanovski, S. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34666 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Nanomaterials, Inflammation, and Tissue Engineering
Padmanabhan, J., & Kyriakides, T. R. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1320 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Collagen Membrane and Immune Response in Guided Bone Regeneration: Recent Progress and Perspectives
Chu, C., Deng, J., Sun, X., Qu, Y., & Man, Y. (2017) · Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0463 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Harnessing macrophage plasticity for tissue regeneration
Smith, T. D., Nagalla, R. R., Chen, E. Y., & Liu, W. F. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.012 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Davison, N. L., Gamblin, A.-L., Layrolle, P., Yuan, H., de Bruijn, J. D., & Groot, F. B. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.013 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Sadowska, J. M., Wei, F., Guo, J., Guillem‐Marti, J., Lin, Z., Ginebra, M., & Xiao, Y. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.057 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Innate Immunity and Biomaterials at the Nexus: Friends or Foes
Christo, S. N., Diener, K. R., Bachhuka, A., Vasilev, K. A., & Hayball, J. D. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/342304 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The effect of surface roughness on RAW 264.7 macrophage phenotype
Barth, K. A., Waterfield, J. D., & Brunette, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34562 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Peng, R., Yao, X., Cao, B., Tang, J., & Ding, J. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.010 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Advances in Nerve Guidance Conduit-Based Therapeutics for Peripheral Nerve Repair
Lackington, W. A., Ryan, A. J., & O’Brien, F. J. (2016) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00500 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Effect of nano-structural properties of biomimetic hydroxyapatite on osteoimmunomodulation
Sadowska, J. M., Wei, F., Guo, J., Guillem‐Marti, J., Ginebra, M., & Xiao, Y. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.058 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Scaffold strategies for modulating immune microenvironment during bone regeneration
He, J., Chen, G., Liu, M., Xu, Z., Chen, H., Yang, L., & Lv, Y. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110411 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Visible Light‐Responsive Dynamic Biomaterials: Going Deeper and Triggering More
Rapp, T. L., & DeForest, C. A. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201901553 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Díez-Tercero, L., Delgado, L. M., Bosch-Rué, È., & Pérez, R. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91070-0 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The influence of nanostructured materials on biointerfacial interactions
Koegler, P., Clayton, A. H. A., Thissen, H. W., Santos, G. N. C., & Kingshott, P. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.001 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Schoenenberger, A. D., Tempfer, H., Lehner, C., Egloff, J., Mauracher, M., Bird, A., Widmer, J., Maniura-Weber, K., Fucentese, S. F., Traweger, A., et al. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120034 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Advanced Strategies for Modulation of the Material–Macrophage Interface
Huyer, L. D., Pascual‐Gil, S., Wang, Y., Mandla, S., Yee, B., & Radisic, M. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909331 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
A Perspective on Immunomodulation and Tissue Repair
Mokarram, N., & Bellamkonda, R. (2014) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0941-0 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Dong, J., Wang, W., Zhou, W., Zhang, S., Li, M., Li, N., Pan, G., Zhang, X., Bai, J., & Zhu, C. (2022) · Biomaterials Research · doi:10.1186/s40824-022-00326-x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Sutthiwanjampa, C., Hong, S., Kim, W. J., Kang, S. H., & Park, H. (2023) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.202202333 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Reduced inflammatory activity of RAW 264.7 macrophages on titania nanotube modified Ti surface
Neacsu, P., Mazare, A., Cîmpean, A., Park, J. W., Costache, M., Schmuki, P., & Demetrescu, I. (2014) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.09.006 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Flégeau, K., Pace, R., Gautier, H., Réthoré, G., Guicheux, J., Visage, C. L., & Weiss, P. (2017) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.07.012 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Critical areas of cell adhesion on micropatterned surfaces
Yan, C., Sun, J., & Ding, J. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.078 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Barr, S., Hill, E. W., & Bayat, A. (2017) · Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.030 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Christo, S. N., Bachhuka, A., Diener, K. R., Mierczynska-Vasilev, A. M., Hayball, J. D., & Vasilev, K. A. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201500845 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Ullm, S., Krüger, A., Tondera, C., Gebauer, T. P., Neffe, A. T., Lendlein, A., Jung, F., & Pietzsch, J. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.023 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Amani, H., Alipour, M., Shahriari, E., & Taboas, J. M. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202401253 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Wang, J., Liu, D., Guo, B., Yang, X., Chen, X., Zhu, X., Fan, Y., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.059 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Engineering Cellular Response Using Nanopatterned Bulk Metallic Glass
Padmanabhan, J., Kinser, E. R., Stalter, M. A., Duncan-Lewis, C., Balestrini, J. L., Sawyer, A. J., Schroers, J., & Kyriakides, T. R. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn501874q · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ambre, A. H., Katti, D. R., & Katti, K. S. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35342 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: 40 Years, What We′ve Learned and What’s Next
Gifford, R. (2013) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201300172 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Damanik, F. F. R., Rothuizen, T. C., van Blitterswijk, C., Rotmans, J. I., & Moroni, L. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06325 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Kyle, D. J. T., Oikonomou, A., Hill, E. W., & Bayat, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.003 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Cell-material interactions in tendon tissue engineering
Lin, J., Zhou, W., Han, S., Bunpetch, V., Zhao, K., Liu, C., Yin, Z., & Ouyang, H. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.012 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Titania nanopores with dual micro-/nano-topography for selective cellular bioactivity
Gulati, K., Moon, H., Li, T., Kumar, P., & Ivanovski, S. (2018) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.075 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Adhikari, U., An, X., Rijal, N. P., Hopkins, T., Khanal, S., Chavez, T., Tatu, R. R., Sankar, J., Little, K. J., Hom, D. B., et al. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.061 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Biomaterials-Mediated Regulation of Macrophage Cell Fate
Liu, Y., & Segura, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.609297 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Tan, X., Gao, P., Li, Y., Qi, P., Liu, J., Shen, R., Wang, L., Huang, N., Xiong, K., Tian, W., et al. (2020) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.024 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Designing biomimetic scaffolds for skin tissue engineering
Chen, J., Fan, Y., Dong, G., Zhou, H., Du, R., Tang, X., Ying, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d3bm00046j · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Serra, T., Capelli, C., Toumpaniari, S., Orriss, I. R., Leong, J., Dalgarno, K. W., & Kalaskar, D. M. (2016) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035001 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Collagen Cross-Linking: Biophysical, Biochemical, and Biological Response Analysis
Delgado, L. M., Fuller, K. P., & Zeugolis, D. (2017) · Tissue Engineering. Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0415 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Antmen, E., Vrana, N. E., & Hasırcı, V. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm00840d · Cited by 89 · see citing works
In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility
Soto, R. J., Hall, J. R., Brown, M. D., Taylor, J. B., & Schoenfisch, M. H. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04251 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
M2 macrophages contribute to osteogenesis and angiogenesis on nanotubular TiO 2 surfaces
Wang, J., Shi, Q., Liu, X., Xu, L., Miao, X., Xu, Z., Cao, L., Wang, H., & Jiang, X. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c6tb03364d · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Sarabi, M. R., Jiang, N., Öztürk, E., Yetisen, A. K., & Taşoğlu, S. (2021) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d0lc01155j · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Substrate topography: A valuable in vitro tool, but a clinical red herring for in vivo tenogenesis
English, A., Azeem, A., Spanoudes, K., Jones, E., Tripathi, B., Basu, N. B., McNamara, K., Tofail, S. A. M., Rooney, N., Riley, G. P., et al. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.035 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Topographical modulation of macrophage phenotype by shrink-film multi-scale wrinkles
Wang, T., Luu, T. U., Chen, A., Khine, M., & Liu, W. F. (2016) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c6bm00224b · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Temporal progression of the host response to implanted poly(ethylene glycol)‐based hydrogels
Lynn, A. D., Blakney, A. K., Kyriakides, T. R., & Bryant, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33015 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, S., Jones, J. A., Xu, Y., Low, H.-Y., Anderson, J. M., & Leong, K. W.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (SG)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leong, Kam W.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3479-3491
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2837101
- OpenAlex
- W2038846800
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (EB000282, HL83008)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- topography, foreign body reaction, cell adhesion, cell fusion, fibrous capsule formation, TNF-α, vascular endothelial growth factor, RAW 264.7 macrophages, polycaprolactone, polylactic acid, polydimethylsiloxane
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Foreign-Body Reaction, Macrophages, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Models, Biological, Polymers, Surface Properties, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review