Cited by 300Psychology of Social InfluenceNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

Neurobiological Correlates of Social Conformity and Independence During Mental Rotation

Berns, Gregory S., Chappelow, Jonathan, Zink, Caroline F., Pagnoni, Giuseppe, Martin-Skurski, Megan E., Richards, Jim·2005·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background When individual judgment conflicts with a group, the individual will often conform his judgment to that of the group. Conformity might arise at an executive level of decision making, or it might arise because the social setting alters the individual's perception of the world.Methods We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a task of mental rotation in the context of peer pressure to investigate the neural basis of individualistic and conforming behavior in the face of wrong information.Results Conformity was associated with functional changes in an occipital-parietal network, especially when the wrong information originated from other people. Independence was associated with increased amygdala and caudate activity, findings consistent with the assumptions of social norm theory about the behavioral saliency of standing alone.Conclusions These findings provide the first biological evidence for the involvement of perceptual and emotional processes during social conformity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.012

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Striatum activity is increased when participants give an objectively correct answer that disagrees with other people.

    “Striatum activity is also increased when participants give an objectively correct answer that disagrees with other people49.”
  • Other research shows that ventral striatum activity while viewing other people's evaluations is not necessarily related to social conformity, or even related to independence from conformity.

    “Other research shows, however, that ventral striatum activity while viewing other people's evaluations is not necessarily related to social conformity 45, or even related to independence from conformity49.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berns, G. S., Chappelow, J., Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., & Richards, J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Berns, Gregory S.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
245-253
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003870436
Cited by
300
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
35.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
conformity, individualism, mental rotation, peer pressure, social norms theory, amygdala, caudate nucleus, emotional salience, perceptual processing, executive decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Internal-External Control, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Oxygen, Pain Measurement, Photic Stimulation, Social Conformity, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review