Cited by 7Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Social cues influence perception of others' pain

Open access
Zhang, Lanlan, Wager, Tor D., Koban, Leonie·2024·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background: Accurately perceiving other people's pain is important in both daily life and healthcare settings. However, judging other's pain is inherently difficult and can be biased by various social and cultural factors. Here, we examined whether perception of others' pain and pain management recommendations are socially influenced by seeing the opinions of other raters. Methods: In Experiment 1 (N = 50), participants rated pictures depicting injured hands or feet of pre‐selected high, medium and low intensities. Each picture was preceded by cues indicating ratings of 10 previous participants. Cues were randomized to indicate low (Social LOW) or high (Social HIGH) pain judgements and were not predictive of actual normative pain intensity. In Experiment 2 (N = 209), participants viewed facial video clips of patients with chronic shoulder pain making painful movements. They estimated patients' pain intensity and provided pain management recommendations. Results: Experiment 1 revealed that perceivers' pain estimates were significantly and substantially higher for stimuli following Social HIGH than Social LOW cues (Cohen's d = 1.26, p < 0.001) and paralleled by increased skin conductance responses. Experiment 2 replicated the effect of social cues on pain judgements (d = 0.58, p < 0.001). However, social cues did not influence post‐study pain management recommendations, potentially due to memory limitations. Conclusions: Together, these studies reveal that judgements of others' pain are robustly modulated by information about others' opinions. Future research could test the prevalence and strength of such effects in clinical settings. Significance: The present study shows that even arbitrary opinions of other raters influence the perception of others' pain. This finding adds new insight into the growing evidence of social and cultural biases in pain estimation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.2225

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Krishnan, A., Woo, C. W., Chang, L. J., Ruzic, L., Gu, X., López-Solà, M., ... & Wager, T. D. (2016). Somatic and vicarious pain are represented by dissociable multivariate brain patterns. Elife, 5, e15166. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15166.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., Wager, T. D., & Koban, L.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou Sport University (CN)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Koban, Leonie
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12-26
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
845-854
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W4390231321
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101041087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
pain perception, social cues, pain estimation, social influence, pain intensity ratings, skin conductance, chronic shoulder pain, facial pain
MeSH terms
Cues, Empathy, Humans, Pain, Social Perception, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review