Cited by 93Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

Neural mechanisms of social influence

Open access
Mason, Malia F., Dyer, Rebecca, Norton, Michael I.·2009·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.001

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, striatum activity is greater when we see that the popular opinion agrees rather than disagrees with our own evaluation of an object, and is related to our current evaluation of an object after we have seen the popular opinion.

    “In general, striatum activity is greater when we see that the popular opinion agrees rather than disagrees with our own evaluation of an object 44, 45, and is related to our current evaluation of an object after we have seen the popular opinion 46, 47.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, M. F., Dyer, R., & Norton, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mason, Malia F.
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
152-159
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130719113
Cited by
93
References
68
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
social influence, normative influence, informational influence, social tagging, peer preference, medial prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, striatum, incidental learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review