Cited by 135Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 61 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Hyperactive Error Responses and Altered Connectivity in Ventromedial and Frontoinsular Cortices in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Open access

Abstract

Background Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) show abnormal functioning in ventral frontal brain regions involved in emotional/motivational processes, including anterior insula/frontal operculum (aI/fO) and ventromedial frontal cortex (VMPFC). While OCD has been associated with an increased neural response to errors, the influence of motivational factors on this effect remains poorly understood. Methods To investigate the contribution of motivational factors to error processing in OCD, and to examine functional connectivity between regions involved in the error response, functional magnetic resonance imaging data were measured in 39 OCD patients (20 unmedicated, 19 medicated) and 38 control subjects (20 unmedicated, 18 medicated) during an error-eliciting interference task where motivational context was varied using monetary incentives (null, loss, and gain). Results Across all errors, OCD patients showed reduced deactivation of VMPFC and greater activation in left aI/fO as compared to controls. For errors specifically resulting in a loss, patients further hyperactivated VMPFC as well as right aI/fO. Independent of activity associated with task events, OCD patients showed greater functional connectivity between VMPFC and regions of bilateral aI/fO and right thalamus. Conclusions OCD patients show greater activation in neural regions associated with emotion and valuation when making errors, which could be related to altered intrinsic functional connectivity between brain networks. These results highlight the importance of emotional/motivational responses to mistakes in OCD, and point to the need for further study of network interactions in the disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.048

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 61 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 52 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Including medicated patient controls with a history of depression in the control group allows group differences to be attributed to OCD rather than to depression or medication effects.

    “As the majority of OCD patients had a history of major depression (see Methods and Materials in the Supplement), a comparison of OCD and controls groups both including medicated patients with history of depression allowed us to better localize group differences to the presence of OCD instead of depression or medication effects”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    OCD involves attributing pathological levels of importance to simple behavioral errors or perceived errors.

    “particularly relevant for a disorder where pathological levels of importance are attributed to simple behavioral errors (or perceived errors).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little prior work has investigated how the emotional or motivational significance of errors affects OCD.

    “Despite the fact that OCD patients show alterations in motivational brain systems, little work has investigated the impact of the emotional/motivational significance of errors in OCD”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(31.7) = 1.8reported p = .078 · recomputed p = .081

    “t (31.7) = 1.8, p = .078”

  • ConsistentF(1, 73) = 5.8reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .019

    “F (1,73) = 5.8, p = .02”

  • ConsistentF(1, 73) = 3.3reported p = .075 · recomputed p = .073

    “F (1,73) = 3.3, p = .075”

3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Stern, E. R., Welsh, R. C., Fitzgerald, K. D., Gehring, W. J., Lister, J. J., Himle, J. A., Abelson, J. L., & Taylor, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Stern, Emily R.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
583-591
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054985367
Cited by
135
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH071821, K23MH082176, F32 MH082573)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, error processing, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, frontal operculum, functional connectivity, financial incentives, motivational context, thalamus
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Emotions, Feedback, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Photic Stimulation, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review