Cited by 150Action Observation and SynchronizationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Functional dissociation of the frontoinsular and anterior cingulate cortices in empathy for pain

Open access
Gu, Xiaosi, Liu, Xun, Guise, Kevin G., Naidich, Thomas P., Hof, Patrick R., Fan, Jin·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The frontoinsular cortex (FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are thought to be involved in empathy for others' pain. However, the functional roles of FI and ACC in empathetic responses have not yet been clearly dissociated in previous studies. In this study, participants viewed color photographs depicting human body parts in painful or nonpainful situations and performed either pain judgment (painful/nonpainful) or laterality judgment (left/right) of the body parts. We found that activation of FI, rather than ACC, showed significant increase for painful compared with nonpainful images, regardless of the task requirement. Our data suggest a clear functional dissociation between FI and ACC in which FI is more domain-specific than ACC when processing empathy for pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4844-09.2010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, X., Liu, X., Guise, K. G., Naidich, T. P., Hof, P. R., & Fan, J.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Jin
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-03-10
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
3739-3744
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2109880731
Cited by
150
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
23.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (22002078)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH083164, R21MH083164)
  • National Center for Research Resources (MO1RR00071, M01RR000071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
empathy for pain, frontoinsular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, functional dissociation, pain perception, domain specificity, mirror neuron system
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Empathy, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Photic Stimulation, Pilot Projects, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review