Cited by 83Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Chronic medication does not affect hyperactive error responses in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Open access
Stern, Emily R., Liu, Yanni, Gehring, William J., Lister, James J., Yin, Gang, Zhang, Jun, Fitzgerald, Kate D., Himle, Joseph A. +2 more·2010·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) show an increased error-related negativity (ERN), yet previous studies have not controlled for medication use, which may be important given evidence linking performance monitoring to neurotransmitter systems targeted by treatment, such as serotonin. In an examination of 19 unmedicated OCD patients, 19 medicated OCD patients, 19 medicated patient controls without OCD, and 21 unmedicated healthy controls, we found greater ERNs in OCD patients than in controls, irrespective of medication use. Severity of generalized anxiety and depression was associated with ERN amplitude in controls but not patients. These data confirm previous findings of an exaggerated error response in OCD, further showing that it cannot be attributed to medication. The absence in patients of a relationship between ERN amplitude and anxiety/depression, as was found in controls, suggests that elevated error signals in OCD may be disorder-specific.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00988.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amplitude of OCD patients' ERN does not depend significantly on the treatments they receive.

    “the amplitude of OCD patients’ ERN does not depend significantly on the treatments they receive [27].”

    From Error-Related Brain Potentials as Biomarkers of Pathology Severity and Treatment Resistance in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results (Electrophysiological) report no significant interaction between ERN amplitude and medication status, and the Discussion says ERNs were similarly increased in medicated and unmedicated OCD groups. The claim broadens this finding from chronic medication to treatments generally; this study did not test the effects of all treatments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stern, E. R., Liu, Y., Gehring, W. J., Lister, J. J., Yin, G., Zhang, J., Fitzgerald, K. D., Himle, J. A., Abelson, J. L., & Taylor, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Stern, Emily R.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
913-20
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2120941817
Cited by
83
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071821, F32MH082573)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, error-related negativity, performance monitoring, chronic medication, serotonin, generalized anxiety disorder, depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review