Cited by 250Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Blunted Neural Response to Rewards as a Prospective Predictor of the Development of Depression in Adolescent Girls

Open access
Nelson, Brady D., Perlman, Greg, Klein, Daniel N., Kotov, Roman, Hajcak, Greg·2016·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A blunted neural response to rewards has recently emerged as a potential mechanistic biomarker of adolescent depression. The reward positivity, an event-related potential elicited by feedback indicating monetary gain relative to loss, has been associated with risk for depression. The authors examined whether the reward positivity prospectively predicted the development of depression 18 months later in a large community sample of adolescent girls. METHOD: The sample included 444 girls 13.5-15.5 years old with no lifetime history of a depressive disorder, along with a biological parent for each girl. At baseline, the adolescents' reward positivity was measured using a monetary guessing task, their current depressive symptoms were assessed using a self-report questionnaire, and the adolescents' and parents' lifetime psychiatric histories were evaluated with diagnostic interviews. The same interview and questionnaire were administered to the adolescents again approximately 18 months later. RESULTS: A blunted reward positivity at baseline predicted first-onset depressive disorder and greater depressive symptom scores 18 months later. The reward positivity was also a significant predictor independent of other prominent risk factors, including baseline depressive symptoms and adolescent and parental lifetime psychiatric history. The combination of a blunted reward positivity and greater depressive symptom scores at baseline provided the greatest positive predictive value for first-onset depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides strong converging evidence that a blunted neural response to rewards precedes adolescent-onset depression and symptom emergence. Blunted neural response may therefore constitute an important target for screening and prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15121524

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alterations in reward processing predict later diagnoses of major depressive disorder, substance use disorder, and conduct disorder even in people who do not meet full diagnostic criteria.

    “Even in individuals who do not meet full diagnostic criteria, alterations in reward processing predict later diagnoses of MDD (Nelson et al., 2016), substance use disorder (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2011; Garfield et al., 2014), and conduct disorder (Rubia et al., 2009).”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]28. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured Clinical Inter- view for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-CV), Clinician Version. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, B. D., Perlman, G., Klein, D. N., Kotov, R., & Hajcak, G.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
173
Issue
12
Pages
1223-1230
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2475319108
Cited by
250
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
reward positivity, adolescent depression, depressive symptoms, event-related potentials, biomarkers, depression risk prediction, adolescent girls
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depressive Disorder, Evoked Potentials, Family Health, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Reward, Risk Factors, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review