Cited by 192Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender Roles and Identity Studies

Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?

Open access
Frederick, David A., Fessler, Daniel M.T., Haselton, Martie G.·2005·Body Image

Abstract

Men overestimate the degree of muscularity that is attractive to women, and women overestimate the degree of thinness that is most attractive to men. Consistent with the thesis that sociocultural input influences such body type preferences and beliefs, we postulated that magazines aimed at a male audience would portray a more muscular male body ideal than would magazines aimed at a female audience. Systematic comparison of popular magazines (Cosmopolitan, Men's Health, Men's Fitness, and Muscle & Fitness) revealed that the ideal male body marketed to men is more muscular than the ideal male body marketed to women. We introduce the Physical Trait Overvaluation Hypothesis, which proposes that gender-specific media fuel emphasis on certain body parts in within-gender prestige competitions. The resulting competitive escalation creates a disconnect between the preferences of one gender and the personal aspirations of the other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The muscular ideal has long been propagated in Western culture through male models, film stars, computer game avatars, and action figures.

    “The muscular ideal has long been propagated in Western culture as shown by the appearance of male models (Frederick et al., 2005; Lanzieri and Cook, 2013), film stars (Pope et al., 2000a,b) computer game avatars (Martins et al., 2011), and action figures (Baghurst et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davidov, V. M. (2000). Physical ideals and mate choices: A comparative study of heterosexual male and lesbian populations. Unpublished master's thesis. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M. T., & Haselton, M. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Frederick, David A.
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
81-86
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999032262
Cited by
192
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
body ideals, media influence on body image, physical attractiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review