Cited by 625Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999–2006

Larimer, Mary E., Cronce, Jessica M.·2007·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This paper serves to update a prior review of the literature on individual-focused prevention and treatment approaches for college drinking [Larimer, M.E. & Cronce, J.M. (2002). Identification, prevention and treatment: A review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Suppl. 14, 148-163.], and covers the period from late 1999 through 2006. No support was found for information/knowledge approaches alone, or for brief values clarification approaches alone or with other informational content. Evidence was found in support of skills-based interventions and motivational interventions that incorporated personalized feedback, with or without an in-person intervention. Normative re-education interventions received mixed support, though personalized normative feedback was associated with positive outcomes. Significant advances have been made over the past seven years with respect to mailed and computerized feedback interventions, and interventions with mandated students. Much of the research reviewed suffered from significant limitations, particularly small sample sizes, attrition, and lack of appropriate control groups. More research is needed to determine the best methods for disseminating such interventions on college campuses, as well as additional research on interventions with high-risk groups of students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larimer, M. E., & Cronce, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
2439-2468
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106151916
Cited by
625
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01 AA01472)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
college drinking, alcohol prevention, skills-based intervention, motivational interventions, personalized feedback, normative feedback, at-risk students, university students, alcohol treatment
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Behavior Therapy, Biofeedback, Psychology, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Motivation, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Students, Universities, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review