Cited by 74Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

An evaluation of a body image intervention in adolescent girls delivered in single-sex versus co-educational classroom settings

Dunstan, Candice J., Paxton, Susan J., McLean, Siân A.·2017·Eating Behaviors

Abstract

Body dissatisfaction is now recognized as having considerable negative impact on social, psychological, and physical health, particularly in adolescent girls. Consequently, we have developed a six-session co-educational body image intervention (Happy Being Me Co-educational) designed to reduce body dissatisfaction and its risk factors in Grade 7 girls. In addition to evaluating the program's efficacy, we aimed to identify whether girls would benefit equally when it was delivered as a universal intervention to a whole class including both boys and girls (co-educational delivery), or delivered as a selective intervention to girls only (single-sex delivery). Participants were 200 Grade 7 girls from five schools in Melbourne, Australia. Schools were randomly allocated to receive the intervention in single-sex classes (n=74), co-educational classes (n=73), or participate as a no-intervention control (n=53). Girls completed self-report assessments of body dissatisfaction, psychological (internalization of the thin ideal, appearance comparison, and self-esteem) and peer environment (weight-related teasing and appearance conversations) risk factors for body dissatisfaction, and dietary restraint, at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. Significant improvements in body dissatisfaction and psychological risk factors were observed in the intervention group at post-intervention and these were maintained at follow-up for psychological risk factors. Importantly, no significant differences between universal and selective delivery were observed, suggesting that the intervention is appropriate for dissemination in both modes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.016

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunstan, C. J., Paxton, S. J., & McLean, S. A.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Paxton, Susan J.
Venue
Eating Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
25
Pages
23-31
ISSN
1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299079263
Cited by
74
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
beyondblue
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
body image interventions, body dissatisfaction, adolescent girls, single-sex classrooms, universal interventions, selective intervention, appearance comparison, self-esteem, weight-related teasing, dietary restraint, peer environment, school-based prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Body Image, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Risk Factors, School Health Services, Self Concept, Thinness, Program Evaluation, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review