Cited by 175Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMedia Influence and Health

Does Media Literacy Mitigate Risk for Reduced Body Satisfaction Following Exposure to Thin-Ideal Media?

Open access
McLean, Siân A., Paxton, Susan J., Wertheim, Eleanor H.·2016·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Exposure to thin-ideal media can contribute to increased body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Understanding the factors that may prevent or exacerbate the negative effects of media exposure on body dissatisfaction is important to facilitate prevention of these problems. This study evaluated the effects of exposure to thin-ideal media images on body image in three instructional set experimental conditions: appearance comparison, peer norms, and control. An important aim was to examine baseline levels of media literacy as a protective factor and trait thin-ideal internalization and trait upward appearance comparison as risk factors. Early adolescent girls (N = 246) completed baseline measures and 1 week later viewed thin-ideal media images, before and after which they rated their state body satisfaction. Participants in the appearance comparison instruction but not peer norms instruction condition had significantly reduced body satisfaction. Media literacy, particularly high levels of critical thinking, mitigated the negative effects of trait thin-ideal internalization and trait upward appearance comparison on body satisfaction outcomes. These findings provide evidence for the role of media literacy as a protective factor against the negative effects on body satisfaction of exposure to thin-ideal media images, and also provide evidence to support the development and implementation of media literacy-based body image interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-016-0440-3

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • School- and community-based preventive interventions can educate girls regarding social media-related risks for body image concerns by increasing media skepticism, awareness of advertisers' motives, and rejection of unrealistic appearance ideals.

    “School- and community-based preventive interventions can educate girls regarding SM-related risks for body image concerns, by increasing media skepticism, awareness of advertisers' motives, and rejection of unrealistic appearance ideals (e.g., Gordon et al., 2020; McLean et al., 2016).”

    From The Perfect Storm: A Developmental-Sociocultural Framework for the Role of Social Media in Adolescent Girls' Body Image Concerns and Mental Health. (2022) · cites this paper as McLean et al., 2016

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) supports media-literacy prevention for adolescent girls, particularly critical thinking about media and skepticism toward unrealistic thin-ideal images. The Media literacy section includes an item about noticing how advertisers attract attention. The paper does not test school- or community-based interventions, establish that they increase these skills, or specifically evaluate prevention of social-media-related risks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roy Morgan (2012). Young Australians Readership: 12 Months to December 2011. http://www.roymorgan.com/news/press-releases/2012/1586/. Accessed 11 July 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLean, S. A., Paxton, S. J., & Wertheim, E. H.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
McLean, Siân A.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2016-02-15
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
1678-1695
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2284148232
Cited by
175
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
FWCI
22.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Rotary Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
media literacy, body satisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, appearance comparison, peer norms, adolescent girls, critical thinking, body image, protective factors
MeSH terms
Literacy, Adolescent, Body Image, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Mass Media, Personal Satisfaction, Risk Factors, Social Values, Thinking, Thinness, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review