Cited by 11Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Surface expression of GABAA receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens is increased in early but not late withdrawal from extended-access cocaine self-administration

Open access
Purgianto, Anthony, Loweth, Jessica A., Miao, Julia J., Milovanovic, Mike, Wolf, Marina E.·2016·Brain Research

Abstract

It is well established that cocaine-induced changes in glutamate receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) play a significant role in animal models of cocaine addiction. Far less is known about cocaine-induced changes in GABA transmission, despite its importance in regulating NAc output via local interneurons and medium spiny neuron (MSN) axon collaterals (GABA 'microcircuit'). Here we investigated whether GABAA receptor surface or total expression is altered following an extended-access cocaine self-administration regimen that produces a time-dependent intensification (incubation) of cue-induced cocaine craving in association with strengthening of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) transmission onto MSN. Rats self-administered cocaine or saline (control condition) 6h/day for 10 days. NAc tissue was obtained and surface proteins biotinylated on three withdrawal days (WD) chosen to span incubation of craving and associated AMPAR plasticity: WD2, WD25 and WD48. Immunoblotting was used to measure total and surface expression of three GABAA receptor subunits (α1, α2, and α4) that are strongly expressed in the NAc. We found a transient increase in surface, but not total, expression of the α2 subunit on WD2 from cocaine self-administration, an effect that was no longer observed by WD25. The expression of α1 and α4 subunits was not altered at these withdrawal times. On WD48, when AMPAR transmission is significantly potentiated, we did not find any alteration in GABAA receptor surface or total expression. Our findings suggest that the strengthening of AMPAR-mediated glutamate transmission in the NAc is not accompanied by compensatory strengthening of GABAergic transmission through insertion of additional GABAA receptors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.04.014

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Withdrawal from cocaine leads to an increase in the surface expression of α2GABAARs in NAc neurons.

    “Withdrawal from cocaine, on the contrary, leads to an increase in the surface expression of α2GABAARs in NAc neurons, possibly making the system even more vulnerable to the effects of cocaine and sensitization [122].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [122]

  • This increase may make the system more vulnerable to the effects of cocaine and sensitization.

    “Withdrawal from cocaine, on the contrary, leads to an increase in the surface expression of α2GABAARs in NAc neurons, possibly making the system even more vulnerable to the effects of cocaine and sensitization [122].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purgianto, A., Loweth, J. A., Miao, J. J., Milovanovic, M., & Wolf, M. E.
Affiliations
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Wolf, Marina E.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
1642
Pages
336-343
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319167265
Cited by
11
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rowan Digitals Works (Rowan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
USPHS (DA009621, DA029099)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
GABAA receptor, nucleus accumbens, cocaine self-administration, cocaine withdrawal, medium spiny neurons, GABAA receptor subunits, alpha2 subunit, surface protein expression, cocaine craving, cocaine dependence
MeSH terms
Animals, Cocaine, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Receptors, GABA-A, Self Administration, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Protein Subunits, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review