Cited by 138Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Effects of an Internet-based intervention for subthreshold eating disorders: A randomized controlled trial

Jacobi, Corinna, Völker, Ulrike, Trockel, Mickey T., Taylor, Craig Barr·2012·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Women reporting initial eating disorder (ED) symptoms are at highest risk for the development of an eating disorder. Preventive interventions should, therefore, be specifically tailored for this subgroup.Aims To adapt and evaluate the effects of the Internet-based prevention program "Student Bodies™" for women with symptoms of disordered eating and/or subthreshold eating disorder (ED) syndromes.Method 126 women, reporting subthreshold ED symptoms (high weight and shape concerns and below threshold bingeing, purging, chronic dieting or several of these symptoms) were randomly assigned to a Student Bodies™+ (SB+) intervention or a wait-list control group and assessed at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. "Student Bodies™" was adapted to be suitable for subthreshold EDs. Main outcome measures were attitudes and symptoms of disordered eating. Pre-follow-up data were analyzed by ANCOVAS with mixed effects.Results At 6-month follow-up, compared to participants in the control group, participants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements on ED-related attitudes. Intervention participants also showed 67% (95% CI = 20-87%) greater reductions in combined rates of subjective and objective binges, and 86% (95% CI = 63-95%) greater reduction in purging episodes. Also, the rates of participants abstinent from all symptoms of disordered eating (restrictive eating, binge eating and any compensatory behavior) were significantly higher in the intervention group (45.1% vs. 26.9%). Post-hoc subgroup analyses revealed that for participants with binge eating the effect on EDE-Q scores was larger than in the pure restricting subgroup.Conclusion The adapted "SB+" program represents an effective intervention for women with subthreshold EDs of the binge eating subtype.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2011.09.013

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobi, C., Völker, U., Trockel, M. T., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobi, Corinna
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
93-99
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049092105
Cited by
138
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Else Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation (P19/06//A05/06)
  • NIMH (MH081124)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
subthreshold eating disorders, disordered eating, student population, binge eating, purging, weight and shape concerns, restrictive eating, compensatory behavior, women, eating disorder prevention, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review