Cited by 107Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The Development of the Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: A Case Study

Open access
Boisseau, Christina L., Farchione, Todd J., Fairholme, Christopher P., Ellard, Kristen K., Barlow, David H.·2010·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

A detailed description of treatment utilizing the Unified Protocol (UP), a transdiagnostic emotion-focused cognitive-behavioral treatment, is presented using a clinical case example treated during the most current phase of an ongoing randomized controlled trial of the UP. The implementation of the UP in its current, modular version is illustrated. A working case conceptualization is presented from the perspective of the UP drawing from theory and research that underlies current transdiagnostic approaches to treatment and consistent with recent dimensional classification proposals (Brown & Barlow, in press). Treatment is illustrated module-by-module describing how the principles of the UP were applied in the presented case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.09.003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barlow DH Boisseau CL Ellard KK Farchione TJ Fairholme CP 2009 Unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders: Modular Version 3.0 Unpublished treatment manual PMC7986982 33762811

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boisseau, C. L., Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Boisseau, Christina L.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
102-113
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989012422
Cited by
107
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH070693)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Unified Protocol, transdiagnostic treatment, emotional disorders, dimensional classification, treatment modules, case formulation, randomized controlled trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review