Cited by 99Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Efficacy of the Unified Protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of comorbid psychopathology accompanying emotional disorders compared to treatments targeting single disorders

Open access
Steele, Stephanie Jarvi, Farchione, Todd J., Cassiello-Robbins, Clair, Ametaj, Amantia, Sbi, Sophia, Sauer-Zavala, Shannon, Barlow, David H.·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine whether the Unified Protocol (UP), a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for emotional disorders (i.e., anxiety, mood, and related disorders), is efficacious in the treatment of co-occurring emotional disorders compared to established single disorder protocols (SDPs) that target specific disorders (e.g., panic disorder).Method Participants included 179 adults seeking outpatient psychotherapy. Participant age ranged from 18 to 66 years, with an average of 30.66 years (SD = 10.77). The sample was 55% female and mostly Caucasian (83%). Diagnostic assessments were completed with the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS), and disorder-specific, clinician-rated measures for the comorbid diagnoses of interest.Results In both treatment conditions, participants' mean number of diagnoses dropped significantly from baseline to posttreatment, and baseline to 12-month follow-up. Additionally, large effects were observed for changes in comorbid generalized anxiety (ES SG: UP = -1.72; SDP = -1.98), social anxiety (ES SG: UP = -1.33, -0.86; SDP = -1.60, -1.54), and depression (ES SG: UP = -0.83; SDP = -0.84). Significant differences were not observed in between-group comparisons.Conclusions Results suggest that both the UP and SDPs are efficacious in reducing symptoms of comorbid emotional disorders. The clinical, practical, and cost-effective advantages of transdiagnostic CBT are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.005

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, there were no significant between-group differences in mean number of diagnoses and decline in symptoms of co-occurring conditions on generalized anxiety disorder-specific measures (g=-0.29, 95% CI -1.12 to 0.54).

    “However, results showed no significant between-group differences in mean number of diagnoses and decline in symptoms of co-occurring conditions on GAD specific measures (g = − 0.29, 95% CI [− 1.12, 0.54]), suggesting that the UP and SDPs may be similarly efficacious for both GAD and co-occurring emotional disorders [96].”

    From Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts (2022) · cites this paper as [96]

    Results, Aim 3 (page unavailable) reports no significant UP–SDP differences in mean number of diagnoses or in comorbid GAD symptoms measured with the GADSS. It gives a range of nonsignificant GADSS effect sizes, but the passages in our copy do not verify the quoted g = −0.29 or its 95% confidence interval. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In another study comparing the unified protocol to single disorder protocols for comorbid disorders, unified protocol participants had significant decreases in mean number of clinical diagnoses from baseline to posttreatment and to 12-month follow-up.

    “In another study comparing the UP to SDPs for comorbid disorders, participants in the UP condition evidenced significant decreases in mean number of clinical diagnoses from baseline to post treatment and baseline to 12-month follow-up [96].”
  • The unified protocol has shown efficacy in both individual and group formats.

    “In fact, this approach has shown its efficacy both in individual [9,10] and group [11,12] formats.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [10]Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Sauer-Zavala S, Latin HM, Ellard KK, Bullis JR,.. Cassiello-Robbins C, 2018a Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Therapist Guide, second ed. Oxford, New York.
  2. [11]Barlow DH, Sauer-Zavala S, Farchione TJ, Murray-Latin H, Ellard KK, Bullis JR,… Cassiello-Robbins C, 2018b Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Workbook, second ed. Oxford, New York.
  3. [13]Brown TA, Barlow DH, 2014 Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule forDSM-5 (ADIS-5L): Lifetime Version-Client Interview Schedule. Oxford, New York.
  4. [21]Di Nardo PA, Brown TA, Barlow DH, 1994 Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime Version (ADIS-IV-L). Oxford, UK.
  5. [53]Yadin E, Foa EB, Lichner TK, 2012 Treating Your OCD with Exposure and Response (Ritual) Prevention: Workbook. Oxford, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steele, S. J., Farchione, T. J., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Ametaj, A., Sbi, S., Sauer-Zavala, S., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Steele, Stephanie Jarvi
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
104
Pages
211-216
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885228589
Cited by
97
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oxford University Press, United Kingdom
  • Guilford Publications Inc., United States
  • Cengage Learning, United States
  • Pearson Publishing, United Kingdom
  • National Institute of Mental Health, United States (R01 MH090053)
  • National Institute of Alcohol and Alcohol Abuse, United States (R01 AA023676)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, United States
  • Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making, United States
  • Department of Defense, United States
  • Renfrew Center, United States
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria, Peru
  • New Zealand Psychological Association, New Zealand
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  • Mayo Clinic, United States
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Unified Protocol, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, depression, panic disorder, treatment efficacy, outpatient psychotherapy, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome, Mood Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review