Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Evolution of Gene Regulation Underlies a Morphological Difference between Two Drosophila Sister Species

Open access
Jeong, Sangyun, Rebeiz, Mark, Andolfatto, Peter, Werner, Thomas, True, John, Carroll, Sean B.·2008·Cell

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Andolfatto, 2005, Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila, Nature, 437, 1149, 10.1038/nature04107 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bachtrog, 2006, Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda, Genetics, 174, 2045, 10.1534/genetics.106.062760 · DOI
  3. Bachtrog, 2006, Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group, Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution, 60, 292
  4. Barolo, 2004, New Drosophila transgenic reporters: insulated P-element vectors expressing fast-maturing RFP, Biotechniques, 36, 436, 10.2144/04363ST03 · DOI
  5. Belting, 1998, Modification of expression and cis-regulation of Hoxc8 in the evolution of diverged axial morphology, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 2355, 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2355 · DOI
  6. Carbone, 2005, Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea, Genetics, 171, 211, 10.1534/genetics.105.044412 · DOI
  7. Cariou, 2001, Divergence between Drosophila santomea and allopatric or sympatric populations of D. yakuba using paralogous amylase genes and migration scenarios along the Cameroon volcanic line, Mol. Ecol., 10, 649, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01225.x · DOI
  8. Carroll, 1995, Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates, Nature, 376, 479, 10.1038/376479a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Drapeau, 2006, A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success, Genetics, 172, 1009, 10.1534/genetics.105.045666 · DOI
  10. Dykhuizen, 1980, Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background, Genetics, 96, 801, 10.1093/genetics/96.4.801 · DOI
  11. Gompel, 2005, Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila, Nature, 433, 481, 10.1038/nature03235 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Haddrill, 2005, Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations, Genome Res., 15, 790, 10.1101/gr.3541005 · DOI
  13. Halligan, 2006, Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison, Genome Res., 16, 875, 10.1101/gr.5022906 · DOI
  14. Hoekstra, 2007, The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation, Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution, 61, 995, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00105.x · DOI
  15. Innan, 2004, Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 10667, 10.1073/pnas.0401720101 · DOI
  16. Jeong, 2006, Regulation of body pigmentation by the Abdominal-B Hox protein and its gain and loss in Drosophila evolution, Cell, 125, 1387, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.043 · DOI
  17. Kim, 2003, Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci, Genetics, 164, 389, 10.1093/genetics/164.1.389 · DOI
  18. Kopp, 2000, Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila, Nature, 408, 553, 10.1038/35046017 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lachaise, 2000, Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé, Proc. Biol. Sci., 267, 1487, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1169 · DOI
  20. Llopart, 2002, Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea, Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution, 56, 2262
  21. McDonald, 1991, Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila, Nature, 351, 652, 10.1038/351652a0 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mundy, 2005, A window on the genetics of evolution: MC1R and plumage colouration in birds, Proc. Biol. Sci., 272, 1633
  23. Nelson, 1993, Drosophila glial architecture and development: analysis using a collection of new cell-specific markers, Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol., 202, 341, 10.1007/BF00188733 · DOI
  24. Nielsen, 2005, Molecular signatures of natural selection, Annu. Rev. Genet., 39, 197, 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Orr, 2001, Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation, Genetics, 157, 875, 10.1093/genetics/157.2.875 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pennings, 2006, Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation, PLoS Genet., 2, 1998, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020186 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pool, 2007, The genetic basis of adaptive pigmentation variation in Drosophila melanogaster, Mol. Ecol., 16, 2844, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03324.x · DOI
  28. Przeworski, 2005, The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation, Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution, 59, 2312, 10.1554/05-273.1 · DOI
  29. Prud'homme, 2007, Emerging principles of regulatory evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 8605, 10.1073/pnas.0700488104 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Shapiro, 2004, Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks, Nature, 428, 717, 10.1038/nature02415 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Steiner, 2007, Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes, PLoS Biol., 5, e219, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050219 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Stern, 1998, A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species, Nature, 396, 463, 10.1038/24863 · DOI
  33. Stern, 2000, Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation, Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution, 54, 1079
  34. Sturtevant, 1993, The Drosophila rhomboid gene mediates the localized formation of wing veins and interacts genetically with components of the EGF-R signaling pathway, Genes Dev., 7, 961, 10.1101/gad.7.6.961 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sucena, 2000, Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4530, 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4530 · DOI
  36. Sucena, 2003, Regulatory evolution of shavenbaby/ovo underlies multiple cases of morphological parallelism, Nature, 424, 935, 10.1038/nature01768 · DOI
  37. Takahashi, 2007, Natural variation of ebony gene controlling thoracic pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 177, 1233, 10.1534/genetics.107.075283 · DOI
  38. True, 2005, Drosophila tan encodes a novel hydrolase required in pigmentation and vision, PLoS Genet., 1, e63, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010063 · DOI
  39. Wittkopp, 2002, Evolution of yellow gene regulation and pigmentation in Drosophila, Curr. Biol., 12, 1547, 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01113-2 · DOI
  40. Wittkopp, 2003, Evolution in black and white: genetic control of pigment patterns in Drosophila, Trends Genet., 19, 495, 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00194-X · DOI · Paper page
  41. Wright, 1987, The genetics of biogenic amine metabolism, sclerotization, and melanization in Drosophila melanogaster, Adv. Genet., 24, 127, 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60008-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jeong, S., Rebeiz, M., Andolfatto, P., Werner, T., True, J., & Carroll, S. B.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
783-793
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136229745
Cited by
305
References
9
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.