Cited by 402Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 62 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Dorsal Raphe Dopamine Neurons Represent the Experience of Social Isolation

Open access

Abstract

The motivation to seek social contact may arise from either positive or negative emotional states, as social interaction can be rewarding and social isolation can be aversive. While ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons may mediate social reward, a cellular substrate for the negative affective state of loneliness has remained elusive. Here, we identify a functional role for DA neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), in which we observe synaptic changes following acute social isolation. DRN DA neurons show increased activity upon social contact following isolation, revealed by in vivo calcium imaging. Optogenetic activation of DRN DA neurons increases social preference but causes place avoidance. Furthermore, these neurons are necessary for promoting rebound sociability following an acute period of isolation. Finally, the degree to which these neurons modulate behavior is predicted by social rank, together supporting a role for DRN dopamine neurons in mediating a loneliness-like state. PAPERCLIP.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) dopamine neurons undergo synaptic potentiation after 24 hr social isolation, increase activity upon first social contact, and are sufficient and necessary for isolation-induced sociability. Their activation promotes social preference but is aversive without a social target, suggesting they represent a loneliness-like state modulated by social rank.

Key findings

  • 24 hr social isolation increased the AMPAR/NMDAR ratio in DRN DA neurons but not VTA DA neurons; isolated mice also showed a greater AMPAR rectification index and NASPM sensitivity, suggesting a relative increase in GluR2-lacking AMPARs.
  • In vivo fiber photometry showed that socially isolated mice had a significantly greater DRN DA calcium signal in response to first contact with a juvenile mouse than group-housed mice, and greater than to a novel object.
  • Optogenetic activation of DRN DA neurons increased social preference in the three-chamber task but did not support ICSS and produced real-time place avoidance and conditioned place avoidance; photoinhibition reduced social preference after isolation but not in group-housed mice.
  • Social rank predicted behavioral effects: dominance positively correlated with activation-induced social preference and negatively with stimulation-zone preference, while photoinhibition reduced social preference more in dominant mice after isolation. DRN DA neurons also released DA and glutamate in dlBNST and CeA; EPSCs were elicited in 25/30 dlBNST neurons and 17/21 CeA neurons, and 77.7% of eYFP+ DRN neurons in TH::Cre mice and 79.8% in DAT::IRES-Cre mice co-labeled with TH.

Methods

  • Ex vivo whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in brain slices (220 μm) from male TH-GFP or Pitx3-GFP mice, measuring AMPAR/NMDAR ratio, rectification index, paired-pulse ratio, and NASPM sensitivity after 24 hr social isolation versus group housing.
  • Fiber photometry in TH::Cre mice with AAV5-CAG-FLEX-GCaMP6m targeted to DRN DA neurons; GCaMP6m fluorescence was recorded in the home cage before and after introduction of a juvenile mouse or novel object.
  • Optogenetic and behavioral experiments in TH::Cre and DAT::Cre mice with AAV5-DIO-ChR2-eYFP, AAV5-DIO-NpHR3.0-eYFP, or AAV5-DIO-eYFP in DRN; assays included three-chamber sociability, ICSS, real-time place avoidance, conditioned place preference, in vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry, and immunohistochemistry.

Limitations

  • The paper states that “loneliness” per se is difficult to directly test in mice; it also states that it remains undetermined whether underlying neural differences cause social rank and/or whether social rank itself changes neuronal properties, and that CeA DA transients were inconsistent and did not adequately resolve as DA.
  • Evident from the text: ex vivo electrophysiology used male mice, and dominance measures are described for males, so sex differences are not addressed.
  • Evident from the text: social-rank effects are correlational, and the “loneliness-like state” interpretation is inferred from mouse behavior rather than directly measured subjective experience.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.040

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 87 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The behavioral and neural state induced by acute social isolation in mice corresponds to the subjective experience of loneliness in humans.

    “Taken together, we propose that DRN DA neurons represent a neural substrate for the subjective experience of social isolation and serve to promote a response to alleviate this aversive state.”
    “supporting a role for DRN dopamine neurons in mediating a loneliness-like state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The subjective experience of social interaction differs between members of a social group depending on their social rank.

    “As a result, the subjective experience of social interaction is likely to differ between members of a social group dependent on their social rank.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social rank offers a useful estimate of an individual's subjective social experience.

    “social rank offers a useful estimate of an individual’s subjective social experience.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 397

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, G. A., Nieh, E. H., Vander Weele, C. M., Halbert, S. A., Pradhan, R. V., Yosafat, A. S., Glober, G. F., Izadmehr, E. M., Thomas, R. E., Lacy, G. D., Wildes, C. P., Ungless, M. A., & Tye, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ungless, Mark A.
  • Tye, Kay M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
164
Issue
4
Pages
617-631
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2269038554
Cited by
402
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17
FWCI
20.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Elsevier eBooks
Funders
  • JPB Foundation
  • PIIF
  • PNDRF
  • JFDP
  • Whitehall Foundation
  • Klingenstein Foundation
  • NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  • Alfred P Sloan Foundation
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Whitehead Career Development Chair
  • NIMH (R01-MH102441-01)
  • NIA (RF1-AG047661-01)
  • NIH (DP2-DK-102256-01)
  • U.K. Medical Research Council (MC-A654-5QB70)
  • The Royal Society
  • Simons Center
  • NSF Graduate Research Program Fellowship
  • Integrative Neuronal Systems Fellowship
  • NIGMS (T32 GM007484)
  • NSF
  • Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program at MIT
  • MIT Summer Research Program
  • Northeastern Cooperative Education Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dorsal raphe nucleus, dopaminergic neurons, social isolation, loneliness, social reward, social preferences, place avoidance, social rank, synaptic plasticity, calcium imaging, optogenetic stimulation, negative emotions
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Loneliness, Male, Reward, Synapses, Ventral Tegmental Area, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Glutamic Acid, Mice, Dopaminergic Neurons, Optogenetics, Dorsal Raphe Nucleus, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review