CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positioning of AMPA Receptor-Containing Endosomes Regulates Synapse Architecture

Esteves da Silva, Marta, Adrian, Max, Schätzle, Philipp, Lipka, Joanna, Watanabe, Takuya, Cho, Sukhee, Futai, Kensuke, Wierenga, Corette J., Kapitein, Lukas C., Hoogenraad, Casper C.·2015·Cell Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.062
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.062

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rab11 is involved in the continuous recycling of endocytosed GluA1-containing AMPARs to the postsynaptic membrane via an EEA1-Rab4-Rab11 endosomal pathway.

    “Rab11 is involved in the continuous recycling of endocytosed GluA1-containing AMPARs to the postsynaptic membrane via an EEA1-Rab4-Rab11 endosomal pathway (Esteves da Silva et al., 2015; Lisé et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008; Park et al., 2004); however, AMPARs can also return to the surface directly from Rab4-positive compartments as was shown for GluA2 (Gu et al., 2016).”

    From Loss of SynDIG4/PRRT1 alters distribution of AMPA receptors in Rab4- and Rab11-positive endosomes and impairs basal AMPA receptor recycling (2025) · cites this paper as Esteves da Silva et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Brown, 2007, Functional compartmentalization of endosomal trafficking for the synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors during long-term potentiation, J. Neurosci., 27, 13311, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4258-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Correia, 2008, Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation, Nat. Neurosci., 11, 457, 10.1038/nn2063 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Czöndör, 2012, Unified quantitative model of AMPA receptor trafficking at synapses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 3522, 10.1073/pnas.1109818109 · DOI
  4. Gu, 2008, Microtubules in dendritic spine development, J. Neurosci., 28, 12120, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2509-08.2008 · DOI
  5. Hoogenraad, 2010, Neuron specific Rab4 effector GRASP-1 coordinates membrane specialization and maturation of recycling endosomes, PLoS Biol., 8, e1000283, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000283 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hu, 2008, Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines, J. Neurosci., 28, 13094, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-08.2008 · DOI
  7. Huganir, 2013, AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years, Neuron, 80, 704, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jaworski, 2009, Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity, Neuron, 61, 85, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kapitein, 2010, Probing intracellular motor protein activity using an inducible cargo trafficking assay, Biophys. J., 99, 2143, 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.055 · DOI
  10. Kapitein, 2013, Myosin-V opposes microtubule-based cargo transport and drives directional motility on cortical actin, Curr. Biol., 23, 828, 10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.068 · DOI
  11. Meyer, 2014, Balance and stability of synaptic structures during synaptic plasticity, Neuron, 82, 430, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Miaczynska, 2004, Not just a sink: endosomes in control of signal transduction, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 16, 400, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.005 · DOI
  13. Nash, 2010, Disruption of the interaction between myosin VI and SAP97 is associated with a reduction in the number of AMPARs at hippocampal synapses, J. Neurochem., 112, 677, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06480.x · DOI
  14. Newpher, 2008, Glutamate receptor dynamics in dendritic microdomains, Neuron, 58, 472, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.030 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Osterweil, 2005, A role for myosin VI in postsynaptic structure and glutamate receptor endocytosis, J. Cell Biol., 168, 329, 10.1083/jcb.200410091 · DOI
  16. Park, 2006, Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes, Neuron, 52, 817, 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.040 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Petrini, 2009, Endocytic trafficking and recycling maintain a pool of mobile surface AMPA receptors required for synaptic potentiation, Neuron, 63, 92, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.025 · DOI
  18. Wagner, 2011, Myosin-Va transports the endoplasmic reticulum into the dendritic spines of Purkinje neurons, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 40, 10.1038/ncb2132 · DOI
  19. Wang, 2008, Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity, Cell, 135, 535, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Yau, 2014, Microtubule minus-end binding protein CAMSAP2 controls axon specification and dendrite development, Neuron, 82, 1058, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Esteves da Silva, M., Adrian, M., Schätzle, P., Lipka, J., Watanabe, T., Cho, S., Futai, K., Wierenga, C. J., Kapitein, L. C., & Hoogenraad, C. C.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
933-943
ISSN
2211-1247
DOI
10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.062
Cited by
126
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review