Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance

Terzis, Vasileios, Economides, Anastasios A.·2011·Computers in Human Behavior

DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage1
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.328 · Cited by 4,161
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 · Cited by 2,726
Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*
Malone, T. W. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2 · Cited by 2,197
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00101-3 · Cited by 1,772
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813
Gender and Competition at a Young Age
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041301821 · Cited by 756
How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults–Analyses of gender and age differences
Chu, R. J.-C. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011 · Cited by 212
The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies
Scott, C. R., & Rockwell, S. C. (1997) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529709379072 · Cited by 182
Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027 · Cited by 160

Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003 · Cited by 728
Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 447
Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1 · Cited by 438
The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020 · Cited by 285
An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?
Faqih, K. M. S. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.01.016 · Cited by 262

See all 194

Authors: Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A.
Venue: Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2011-11
Volume: 27
Issue: 6
Pages: 2108-2122
ISSN: 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
OpenAlex: W1977648576
Cited by: 194
References: 20
FWCI: 31.52
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks

Data sources