Cited by 594Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesGender and Technology in Education

Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?

King, A.L.S., Valença, A.M., Silva, A.C.O., Baczynski, T., Carvalho, M.R., Nardi, A.E.·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C. O., Baczynski, T., Carvalho, M. R., & Nardi, A. E.
Affiliations
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Corresponding author
King, A.L.S.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
140-144
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024911920
Cited by
594
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
29.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
nomophobia, social anxiety disorder, technology dependence, virtual communication, mobile phone anxiety, computer use, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, comorbidities, social avoidance, anxiety disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review