Cited by 272Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyDigital Media and Philosophy

Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: a qualitative focus group study

Throuvala, Melina A., Griffiths, Mark D., Rennoldson, Mike, Kuss, Daria J.·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.012

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J.
Affiliations
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Throuvala, Melina A.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
93
Pages
164-175
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903612776
Cited by
272
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 9
FWCI
33.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
TA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
adolescent social media use, social networking sites, need for control, emotion regulation, peer comparison, self-presentation, social media addiction, compulsive use, fear of missing out, nomophobia, uses and gratifications theory, self-determination theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review