Cited by 59Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Psychological predictors of addictive social networking sites use: the case of Serbia

Milošević-Đorđević, Jasna S., Žeželj, Iris L.·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.018

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milošević-Đorđević, J. S., & Žeželj, I. L.
Affiliations
University of Belgrade (RS)
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
32
Pages
229-234
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963952793
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • International Research and Exchanges Board
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
social networking sites, Facebook, self-esteem, general self-efficacy, introversion, sociodemographic predictors, Serbia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review