The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There was little mention of power imbalance or repetition in discussions around defining cyberbullying, despite these being defining features for adolescents in previous research (54–57, 59).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the disregard of power imbalance is congruent with previous research (55, 59).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“Using interviews, adolescent cyberbullying victims identified several defining features including victim impact, both deliberate and non-deliberate intent, repetition (whether multiple incidents or a single occurrence), use of technological medium, and publicity (59).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“Importantly, power imbalance was absent from these definitions, despite its prominence in traditional bullying definitions.”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“When discussing definitions of cyberbullying, this was heavily focused on the target’s perspective. For example, if they were affected (41, 57, 59) and determined intention based on whether the perpetrator continued after being told to stop (8), with very little mention of the perpetrator’s actions.”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“All focus groups centered discussions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression within the context of SM, echoing previous research stating that SM provides ample opportunities for cyber-based aggressions (59) and empowers perpetrators (94).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“echoing previous research stating that SM provides ample opportunities for cyber-based aggressions (59) and empowers perpetrators (94).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“the psychological and emotional consequences of cyberbullying represent the largest problem for the victim (Dredge et al., 2014;Jang et al., 2014).”
From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Dredge et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1080 · Cited by 4,755
McLeod, J. (1999) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209588.n8 · Cited by 3,964
Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · Cited by 3,639
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,566
Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006) · Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice · doi:10.1177/1541204006286288 · Cited by 1,701
Sociality Through Social Network Sites
Ellison, N. B., & boyd, D. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008 · Cited by 1,021
Kim, J., & Lee, J.-E. R. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0374 · Cited by 930 · cited 2×
“Furthermore, Marcum (2008) and Kim and Lee (2011) relied on selfreport data from participants about their online and SNS activities.”
BackgroundInfluentialKing, N. (2012) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526435620.n24 · Cited by 915
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McGrath, H. (2009). Young people and technology: A review of the current literature. Retrieved from the Alannah and Madeline Foundation website: <http://www.ncab.org.au/Assets/Files/2ndEdition_Youngpeopleandtechnology_LitReview_June202009.pdf>.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of hate speech automatic detection using natural language processing
Jahan, M. S., & Oussalah, M. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126232 · Cited by 345
Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103411 · Cited by 219
Cyberbullying on Social Networking Sites: The Crime Opportunity and Affordance Perspectives
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., & Wong, R. Y. M. (2019) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1599500 · Cited by 190
Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses' responses to cyberbullying
Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2016) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.026 · Cited by 185
Adolescent cyberbullying: A review of characteristics, prevention and intervention strategies
Ang, R. P.-H. (2015) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.011 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & de la Piedad Garcia, X.
- Affiliations
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dredge, Rebecca
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026085022
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, social networking sites, child victims, victim perspective, emotional impact, social impact, behavioral effects, online harassment, cyberbullying intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
