The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Earlier studies, according to Abdullah and Ward [84,85], found that PE had a substantial impact on the PEOU and PU for e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Abdullah and Ward [85] reported a substantial and optimistic relationship between PE and PEOU for e-learning in eight out of eleven research studies.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“Perceived enjoyment is essential in assessing the adoption of e-learning.”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“The same is true between PE and PU, as is evident from eight out of eight studies (100%).”
From Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: the role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
(1985) · Cited by 6,185
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bhatiasevi, 2011, Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: an extension of the technology acceptance model, The Social Sciences, 6, 513
- Hsu, 2013, Vol. 3(4), 211
- Lin, 2010, Understanding college students' continuing intentions to use multimedia e-learning systems, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8, 488
- Shen, 2010, Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the interactive whiteboard technology environment, International Review on Computers and Software, 5, 200
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 981
Mailizar, M., & Johar, R. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2021.14243a · Cited by 41
Xu, Y., Jin, L., Deifell, E., & Angus, K. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102542 · Cited by 47
Weerathunga, P. R., Samarathunga, W. H. M. S., Rathnayake, H. N., Agampodi, S. B., Nurunnabi, M., & Madhunimasha, M. M. S. C. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11080436 · Cited by 40
“…Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) [26], extended versions of TAM such as TAM2 [27] and TAM3 [28], and more recently developed acceptance models such as Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of the Technology (UTAUT) [29] and General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialUpadhyay, N., Kamble, A. A., & Navare, A. V. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101800 · Cited by 53
Jiang, L., & Liang, X. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11734-4 · Cited by 40
“Abdullah and Ward (2016), Alraimi et al. (2015), Chang et al. (2020), and Liu and Pu (2020) conducted research on undergraduate students’ online learning intentions based on various technology acceptance models.”
BackgroundResultHasani, T., Rezania, D., & Mohammadi, M. (2024) · International Journal of Engineering Business Management · doi:10.1177/18479790241257118 · Cited by 49
“Within the organizational perspective, Word-of-Mouth, 57 collective capability, 58 and computer anxiety 59,60 are considered signi fi cant drivers of metaverse adoption.”
Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer‐Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00195-7 · Cited by 105
“Venkatesh and Davis [52] included external variables to extend the model’s informational value, as did prior research that examined the relation of numerous external variables to the TAM’s key components, e.g., self-efficacy and social norms [13, 53].”
InfluentialAssessment in Smart Learning Environments: Psychological factors affecting perceived learning
Thomas, L. J., Parsons, M., & Whitcombe, D. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.037 · Cited by 43
Emotional outcomes of e-learning adoption during compulsory online education
Şahin, F., Doğan, E., Okur, M. R., & Şahin, Y. L. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10930-y · Cited by 40
“Self-efficacy (SE), which is among the most studied variables in the context of e-learning (Abdullah & Ward, 2016), is explained as an individual’s judgment of the capacity he/she has to fulfill a task (Bandura, 1982).”
BackgroundInfluences of subjective norms on teachers’ intention to use social media in working
Tran, H. T. T., Nga, N. T., & Tang, T. T. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/12659 · Cited by 43
“Furthermore, Abdullah and Ward (2016) reviewed 107 TAM papers published in the last ten years and pointed out that SNs are the most widely used and influential drivers of attitudes and intentions to use social networks.”
BackgroundKimathi, F. A., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2019.101017 · Cited by 39
“The external variables identified by (Abdullah & Ward, 2016) were included (five variable).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDiscrepancy between language learners and teachers concerns about emergency remote teaching
Shlowiy, A. A., Al‐Hoorie, A. H., & Alharbi, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12543 · Cited by 46
Amin, M. A., Arefin, M. S., Hossain, I., Islam, M. R., Sultana, N., & Hossain, M. N. (2021) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1980640 · Cited by 39
“Subjective norm (SN) refers to the extent to which people feel pressure from other community members to use or not to use a specific technology (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundAmin, M. A., Arefin, M. S., Alam, M. S., & Rasul, T. (2022) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.2018750 · Cited by 44
“Subjective norms refer to the extent to which people feel pressure from others of their community (e.g., family, friends, and colleagues who are essential to them) to act in a certain way (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Ham et al., 2015).”
BackgroundXiao, R., Yazan, M., & Situmeang, F. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2314348 · Cited by 40
“The relationship between anthropomorphism and perceived risk could be studied through acceptance, as it serves as a predictor of behavioral intention, performance, and consumer perception (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chen et al., 2020; Lunney et al., 2016; Nikou & Economides, 2017; Oyman et al., 2022).”
Nguyen, T. T. U., Nguyen, P. V., Huynh, H. T. N., Truong, G. Q., & Do, L. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100291 · Cited by 91
Al‐Okaily, M., Alqudah, H. M., Matar, A., Lutfi, A., & Taamneh, A. M. (2020) · Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews · doi:10.18510/hssr.2020.8483 · Cited by 38
Lin, H., & Ho, W. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1413790 · Cited by 37
“Although many researchers have demonstrated the content validity of TAM in the management of information systems (MIS) field (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Huang, Lin, & CONTACT Wen-Hsien Ho whho@kmu.edu.tw © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Chan, 2012), individual cultural characteristics also affect…”
BackgroundInvestigating students’ E-Learning attitudes in times of crisis (COVID-19 pandemic)
Çevik, M., & Baki̇oğlu, B. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10591-3 · Cited by 47
“Previous studies reveal that the concept of self-efficacy plays a critical role on the ease of using e-learning technologies and affecting perceived usefulness (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundAlismaiel, O. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132413565 · Cited by 40
Pham, H., Tran, Q. N., La, G.-L., Doan, H.-M., & Vu, H. (2021) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2021.107482 · Cited by 37
“King and He [4] , Sumak et al. [5] , Abdullah and Ward [6] , and Al-Qaysi [7] argue that TAM is suitable to build a research model on students’ technology use behavior.”
BackgroundAlqahtani, M. A., Alamri, M. M., Sayaf, A. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886272 · Cited by 36
“By using second-order links in the TAM and IS success model, this work contributes to theory growth by bridging the gap between e-learning adoption research (Mohammadi, 2015; Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Alenazy et al., 2019) and the IS literature (Venkatesh et al., 2012).”
MethodDeveloping and Validating a Scale of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Chinese EFL Teachers
Liu, X., & Liu, Y. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12902 · Cited by 49
Anderson, V. A., Gifford, J., & Wildman, J. (2020) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1721982 · Cited by 44
“Social technology tools have become more prominent in recent years in the HRD fi eld (Abdullah and Ward 2016) and studies of technology as a feature of workplace learning in health and social care sector contexts are well represented in the literature base (c.f. Costello et al. 2014; George et al.…”
BackgroundMethodManika, D., Antonetti, P., Papagiannidis, S., & Guo, X. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121005 · Cited by 39
Students’ Continuance Intention to Use Moodle: An Expectation-Confirmation Model Approach
Rabaa’i, A. A., ALmaati, S. A., & Zhu, X. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management · doi:10.28945/4842 · Cited by 43
“…of effort expectancy on pe rfor-mance expectancy (e.g., Alalwan et al., 2016, 2017, 2018; Alkhaldi & Kharma, 2019; Alshurideh et al., 2020; Jaradat & Al Rababaa, 2013; Joo et al., 2016; Rabaai et al., 2015), and on attitude (e.g., Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Davis, 1989; Sabah, 2019; Wu & Chen, 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWald, R., Piotrowski, J. T., Araujo, T., & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107526 · Cited by 36
The extended technology acceptance model for Web 2.0 technologies in teaching
Şimşek, A. S., & Ateş, H. (2022) · Innoeduca International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation · doi:10.24310/innoeduca.2022.v8i2.15413 · Cited by 45
İbi̇li̇, E., Ölmez, M. Ö., Ci̇han, A., Bi̇lal, F., İbi̇li̇, A. B., Okumus, N., & Billinghurst, M. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2240860 · Cited by 45
“Experience, anxiety, social norms, and self-e ffi cacy factors in the GETAMEL model developed by Abdullah and Ward (2016) were added to the original TAM model.”
InfluentialThe Relationship between Nurses’ Training and Perceptions of Electronic Documentation Systems
Zaman, N., Goldberg, D. M., Kelly, S. E., Russell, R. S., & Drye, S. L. (2021) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep11010002 · Cited by 41
Reeves, A., Calic, D., & Delfabbro, P. (2021) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102281 · Cited by 35
Dolenc, K., Šorgo, A., & Virtič, M. P. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10558-4 · Cited by 50
Zhou, S., Zhou, Y., & Huiling, Z. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061379 · Cited by 35
“Self-efficacy, subjective norm, perceived enjoyment, computer anxiety and experience were reported as the mostly commonly used external factors of technology acceptance of e-learning (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
MethodExploring the key factors influencing the actual usage of digital tax platforms
Abu-Silake, S. A., Alshurafat, H., Alaqrabawi, M., & Shehadeh, M. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00241-2 · Cited by 57
Zhang, D., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108359 · Cited by 37
Liu, Y., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15081040 · Cited by 34
“Perceived enjoyment (PE) refers to the extent to which using a technology is perceived to be enjoyable in its own right, aside from any external rewards or outcomes (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Venkatesh, 2000).”
Cross-national differences in mobile learning adoption during COVID-19
Alzaidi, M. S., & Shehawy, Y. M. (2022) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-05-2021-0179 · Cited by 34
The behavioural intention to use MOOCs by undergraduate students: incorporating TAM with TPB
Wang, K., Almazor, E. V. H., & Criado, J. R. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-11-2021-0446 · Cited by 38
Students Digital Maturity and Its Implications for Sustainable Behavior
Awdziej, M., Jaciow, M., Lipowski, M., Tkaczyk, J., & Wolny, R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15097269 · Cited by 57
Factors affecting the use of climate information services for agriculture: Evidence from Iran
Savari, M., Zhoolideh, M., & Limuie, M. (2024) · Climate Services · doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100438 · Cited by 36
Ateş, H., & GÜNDÜZALP, C. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2457350 · Cited by 37
“It can also be defined as the feeling of discomfort or nervousness that individuals may experience when using new technologies, particularly if they perceive the technology as complex or difficult to use settings (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
InfluentialZiba, P. W., & Kang, J. (2019) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666919855427 · Cited by 33
“Unlike Abdullah and Ward (2016); Dutot (2015); Venkatesh and Davis (2000), who found that SN is a predictor of performance expectancy, this study shows that performance expectancy is a predictor of SN.”
BackgroundFussell, S. G., & Truong, D. (2020) · International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace · doi:10.15394/ijaaa.2020.1504 · Cited by 41
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) and Chang, Hajiyev, and Su (2017) found that PENJ influences PEU and PU toward using e-learning tools.”
BackgroundInfluentialWiki use for knowledge integration and learning: A three tier conceptualization
Luo, M. M., & Chea, S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103920 · Cited by 33
Milutinović, V. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10887-y · Cited by 42
“Abdullah and Ward (2016) in the meta-analysis of 107 scholar papers found positive influence of SN on both PEU and PU, with larger effects on PEU, which was also confirmed in meta-analysis of Scherer et al. (2019).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFactors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Role of TPACK and Facilitating Conditions
Wangdi, T., Dhendup, S., Yangchen Gatshel HSS, M. O. E., Gyelmo, T., & Changangkha MSS, M. O. E. (2023) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2023.16254a · Cited by 32
Ateş, H., & Köroğlu, M. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12931 · Cited by 48
Lee, J.-C., & Xiong, L. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-08-2020-0348 · Cited by 33
Navigating the fourth industrial revolution: a systematic review of technology adoption model trends
Kruger, S., & Steyn, R. (2024) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-11-2022-0188 · Cited by 31
Explore the driving factors of designers’ AIGC usage behavior based on SOR framework
Wang, S.-F., & Chen, C.-C. (2024) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1417016 · Cited by 33
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12954-y · Cited by 31
“…theoretical research, such as reviews and meta-analyses, have summarized empirical findings on specific topics within education, like teachers’ adoption of technology, e-learning adoption, and TAM in m-learning environments (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Al-Emran et al., 2018; Scherer et al., 2019).”
Wu, H., & Pan, Z. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12898 · Cited by 32
IDENTIFYING FACTORS AFFECTING INTENTION TO USE IN DISTANCE LEARNING SYSTEMS
Baki, R., Birgören, B., & Aktepe, A. (2021) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.906545 · Cited by 31
“10; Anxiety has an impact (negative) on Perceived Ease of Use of learners that uses the DLS. Abdullah and Ward (2016) analyse 107 researches that investigate users’ distance learning acceptance via utilizing Technology Acceptance Model, concluding that Self Efficacy, Subjective Norm, Enjoyment,…”
BackgroundLiu, A., Grande, E. U., López-Sánchez, P., & López, Á. R. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102041 · Cited by 33
Wang, Y.-M., Wei, C., Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2231278 · Cited by 37
“…cultural, and political factors that affect perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use (ie, measures of users ’ attitude toward using e-learning technology) and subsequent intention to use and actual use (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Al-Fraihat et al., 2020; Huang & Chueh, 2022; Pal & Vanijja, 2020).”
Chen, L.-H. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100276 · Cited by 48
AI-powered education: Driving entrepreneurial spirit among university students
Zulfiqar, S., Sarwar, B., Huo, C., Zhao, X., & Mahasbi, H. U. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101106 · Cited by 42
Technology Acceptance Model in Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Meta-Analysis
Xue, L., Mahat, J., & Ghazali, N. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251409441 · Cited by 61
“…(Mustafa & Garcia, 2021), mobile learning (Al-Emran et al., 2018; C. Liu et al., 2024; Mugo et al., 2017), learning management systems (Cavus et al., 2022), higher education (Rosli et al., 2022), e-learning (Abdullah & Ward, 2016), and technology adoption by teachers (Scherer et al., 2019).”
Kaewsaeng‐on, R., AL-Takhayneh, S. K., Jam, F. A., Chang, B.-L., Pradana, M., & Mahmood, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028219 · Cited by 43
“When the performance expectancy between innovation and behavior improves, adopting teaching practices more compatible with innovation behavior becomes more viable (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Waheed et al., 2017; Abbas et al., 2021; Subasinghe, 2021).”
BackgroundStaying connected: smartphone acceptance and use level differences of older adults in China
Zhu, X., & Cheng, X. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-022-00933-4 · Cited by 33
“It has been considered as an antecedent of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness in many studies [27, 28].”
InfluentialDima, A. M., Bușu, M., & Vargas, V. M. (2022) · Oeconomia Copernicana · doi:10.24136/oc.2022.036 · Cited by 30
“Many prior papers have analysed the indicators that affect the implementation of e-learning in a variety of scenarios (Abbad, 2021; Fazil & Rupert, 2016; Hossein, 2015; El-Masri & Tarhini, 2015; Mehta et al., 2019).”
Almusharraf, A. M., & Bailey, D. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12857 · Cited by 30
Sustainable Higher Education Development through Technology Enhanced Learning
Orozco-Messana, J., Martínez-Rubio, J. M., & Gonzálvez-Pons, A. M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093600 · Cited by 34
Liu, Y., Sun, J. C., & Chen, S. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1955271 · Cited by 29
Technology Acceptance and Adoption in Education
Granić, A. (2022) · Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_11-1 · Cited by 29
Szymkowiak, A., & Jeganathan, K. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13229 · Cited by 35
Neo, M., Lee, C. P., Tan, H. Y.-J., Neo, T. K., Tan, Y. X., Mahendru, N., & Ismat, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Technology · doi:10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5843 · Cited by 43
“A self-efficacy quiz was also provided to the learner to assess themselves and to reflect on their scores, as learners’ selfefficacy has been shown to impact their attitudes towards using the technology (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundHwang, Y., Al-Arabiat, M., Shin, D., & Lee, Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.025 · Cited by 29
“The contribution of this research is to show important aspects of information proactiveness of knowledge workers in the systems implementation, applying the technology acceptance model (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Davis, 1989) and personal information management model (Hwang et al., 2015).”
MethodMulhem, A. A. A. (2020) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v14i03.11576 · Cited by 29
“It plays a significant role in today's university educational processes [2].”
BackgroundWibowo, A., Saptono, A., Narmaditya, B. S., Effendi, M. S., Mukhtar, S., Suparno, S., & Shafiai, M. H. M. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2314253 · Cited by 48
“…Dese and Dei. the results of this research corroborate some previous studies which stated that tam variables can promote either Dese or Dei (abdullah & ward, 2016; Darmanto et al. (2022). the reason behind these findings is that users will consider perceived usefulness and perceived ease…”
InfluentialAlmusharraf, A. I. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su162210037 · Cited by 56
Factors that Influence the Adoption of Postgraduate Online Courses
Martinho, D., Santos, E., Miguel, I., & Cordeiro, D. S. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i12.8864 · Cited by 31
“Although there is no agreement in the identified external variables, there is some consensus about factors related to environment features (course design, interface design, interaction, synchronous and asynchronous communication) and learners' features (self-efficacy, user technology experience) [16] [10] [11] [14] [1…”
BackgroundNizar, N. N. M., Rahmat, M. K., Maaruf, S. Z., & Damio, S. M. (2019) · Asian Journal of University Education · doi:10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7799 · Cited by 28
“Previous research findings provide comfirmatory evidence that there is a relationship between EE and UB (Bharati et al., 2018; Guest et al., 2018; Jaya et al., 2017; Abdullah & Ward, 2016 and Madigan et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAltalbe, A. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3087344 · Cited by 34
“…it has been widely criticized for its theoretical assumptions and practical effectiveness [35], lack of variables related to human and social processing factors [36], and low explanatory power with an explained variance of about 40% in the original TAM and about 52% to 70% in the extended TAM [37].”
BackgroundKemp, A., Palmer, E., Strelan, P., & Thompson, H. (2022) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.7338 · Cited by 28
“While other technology acceptance models exist (see Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Venkatesh et al., 2003), Davis’ TAM was chosen in this study because its core is well-validated and easily extended.”
MethodOnline learning readiness and online learning system success in Vietnamese higher education
Pham, T. L., & Dau, T. T. K. (2022) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-03-2021-0044 · Cited by 28
Kuadey, N. A., Mahama, F., Ankora, C., Bensah, L., Maale, G. T., Agbesi, V. K., Kuadey, A. M., & Adjei, L. (2022) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-11-2021-0202 · Cited by 30
Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learning
Sui, C.-J., Yen, M.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x · Cited by 27
“Furthermore, self-efficacy represents an evaluation of users’ ability to utilize technology, which may impact their perception of its usefulness and ease of use (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Chahal & Rani, 2022; Gong et al., 2004).”
University of South Alabama, Howard, M. C., Hair, J. F., & University of South Alabama (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00084 · Cited by 27
“These models include the original TAM as their core theoretical basis but supplement it with additional constructs (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Scherer et al., 2019; Venkatesh, 2000; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Venkatesh et al., 2003).”
InfluentialIslam, S., Islam, M. F., & Zannat, N.-E. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231197495 · Cited by 34
“From subjective norms, individuals might feel community pressure to utilize or avoid a specific technology convenient to their environment and cultural values (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundŞahin, F., Kızılaslan, A., & Şimşek, Ö. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12383-3 · Cited by 33
“…with various educational environment stakeholders, such as students, teachers, and instructors, in the literature, are generally in the same direction (e.g Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Şahin et al., 2021, 2022b; Ursavaş, 2014; Ursavaş et al., 2019; Venkatesh et al., 2003; Yıldız et al., 2022a, b).”
Assessing timebanking use and coordination: implications for service exchange tools
Yuan, C. W., Hanrahan, B. V., & Carroll, J. M. (2018) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-09-2017-0311 · Cited by 26
Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces
Kopplin, C. S. (2020) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-020-00382-4 · Cited by 27
“Current research (Abdullah and Ward 2016; see also meta-analysis by Dwivedi et al. 2019), as well as this study, re-introduces attitude which is defined as evaluation of system use desirability (Mathieson 1991).”
BackgroundMatarirano, O., Jere, N. R., Sibanda, H. S., & Panicker, M. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16821 · Cited by 27
“Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2956–2960, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.4492 [68] F. Abdullah, R. Ward, and E. Ahmed, “Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived 78 http://www.i-jet.org Usefulness (PU) of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNicolaou, C., Matsiola, M., Karypidou, C., Podara, A., Kotsakis, R., & Kalliris, G. M. (2021) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia2020010 · Cited by 31
Nguyen, X.-A., Hòa, P. Đ., Luong, D., & Xuan-thuc-anh, C. A. O. (2021) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.961828 · Cited by 27
“TAM was built and developed based on the theory of reasoned action (TRA), which was proposed by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975), and emerged along at the same time of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Abdullah and Ward, 2016; Chen et al., 2013; Chuttur, 2009; Wu, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodAL-Sayid, F., & Kirkil, G. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2087013 · Cited by 27
“Also, it has a significant positive relationship with perceived ease of use of e-learning, where the overall average path coefficient is Beta ¼ 0.342 in 80% of these studies of interest (Abdullah & Ward, 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialImpact of technology self-efficacy on online learning effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic
Rahman, M. K., Bhuiyan, M. A., Hossain, M. M., & Sifa, R. (2023) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-07-2022-1049 · Cited by 39
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Lalli, G. S. (2025) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2024-0301 · Cited by 29
“This fi nding could be justi fi ed by the extended TAM proposed by Abdullah and Ward (2016), which suggests that individuals ’ distrust in GenAI, concerns about its security, and uncertainties about their pro fi ciency in using GenAI may hinder their ability to e ff ectively utilize this technology.”
InfluentialDele-Ajayi, O., Strachan, R., Anderson, E. V., & Victor, A. M. (2019) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028527 · Cited by 37
A Comparison of Faculty and Student Acceptance Behavior toward Learning Management Systems
Kim, J. J., Yoon, Y., & Kim, E.-J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18168570 · Cited by 26
“Among the incorporations or extensions to TAM, the most popular adopted external factors are: self-efficacy, subjective norm, enjoyment, and computer anxiety [8,9].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWu, R., & Yu, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2097779 · Cited by 29
“On the other aspect, prior studies have extended TAM with many constructs such as perceived risk (M. Lee, 2009); satisfaction (M. Lee, 2010); self-efficacy (Abdullah & Ward, 2016), and conformity behavior (Yu, 2020).”
BackgroundWang, B., & Dong, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1180072 · Cited by 25
“The theory is developed on the basis of seven theoretical paradigms (Abdullah and Ward, 2016), including social cognitive theory (SCT), rational behavior theory (TRA), planned behavior theory (TPB), technology fi t theory (TTF), innovation diffusion theory (IDT), motivation theory (MT), compound TAM…”
BackgroundAn empirical investigation of college students’ acceptance of translation technologies
Li, X., Gao, Z., & Liao, H. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297297 · Cited by 34
Unlocking innovation: how enjoyment drives GenAI use in higher education
Cano, J. R., & Núñez, N. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1483853 · Cited by 39
Zhu, Z., Ren, Y., & Shen, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13551-3 · Cited by 30
“When students express pleasure and enjoyment when using technology, they tend to have higher levels of intrinsic motivation (Abdullah & Ward, 2016; Cai et al., 2023).”
InfluentialGkika, E. C., Anagnostopoulos, T., Ntanos, S., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6020041 · Cited by 25
Matarirano, O., Panicker, M., Jere, N. R., & Maliwa, A. (2021) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/35-2-4025 · Cited by 25
“…0.000 SE -> CA -0.133 1.418 0.157 SE -> ENJOY 0.583 7.014 0.000 SE -> PEOU 0.468 2.578 0.010 SE -> PU 0.040 0.272 0.786 SN -> PEOU 0.089 0.938 0.349 SN -> PU 0.220 2.386 0.017 The path coefficients and p-value are used to measure the strength of each causal relationship (Abdullah and Ward 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialPour, M. J., Mesrābādi, J., & Asarian, M. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-01-2021-0011 · Cited by 37
Hasan, M. M., Amin, M. A., Moon, Z. K., & Afrin, F. (2022) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s377682 · Cited by 34
“53 Accordingly, the users of green banking often embrace the opinions, attitudes, and behavior of significant people in their community.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullah, Fazil
- ORCID
- Ward, Rupert
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 238-256
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214098284
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.hud.ac.uk
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, e-learning adoption, extended technology acceptance model, self-efficacy, subjective norms, enjoyment, computer anxiety, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, external factors, student acceptance of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review