Cited by 196Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Use by Older AdultsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone

Kim, Jung-Hyun·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.004

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J.-H.
Affiliations
Sogang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jung-Hyun
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
67
Pages
282-291
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2551276078
Cited by
196
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
28.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2014S1A5A8012112)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, face-to-face interaction, smartphone addiction, social support, escape motivation, relationship motivation, social networks, age differences, adolescents, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review